• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Analyzing Isaiah 7:14-16 as a Credobaptist proof text for the Age of Accountability.

Ain't Zwinglian

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2020
1,272
803
Oregon
✟166,537.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The Text

14) Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel.​
15) He will eat curds and honey at the time He knows enough to refuse evil and choose good.​
16) For before the boy will know enough to refuse evil and choose good, the land whose two kings you dread will be forsaken.​


Many credobaptists see the remedy of infant salvation in the Age of Accountability and use Isaiah 7 as evidence. Some believe when Isaiah’s son Shear-jashub is old enough to “refuse evil and choose good,” is the functional equivalent of guiltlessness or sinlessness before God prior to the "Age of Accountability."

I disagree. The age when the child “refuses evil and chooses good” is a Hebraism. It is much closer to the meaning of “maturity and immaturity” than “guiltlessness and sinlessness” of Isaiah’s child and the context bears this out.

The Context of Isaiah 7.

King Ahaz in Jerusalem is deeply troubled about being invaded by the alliance of Northern Israel and Syria. God tells Isaiah to take his young son Shear-jashub, to go to Ahaz and have Ahaz ask for a sign from God for Jerusalem not to be conquered. Ahaz refuses to ask for a sign, but God gives Ahaz not one sign but two signs.

The first sign is remote and Messianic ( v. 14); the second sign (vs. 15-16) is immediate and specifically deals with the maturing age of Isaiah’s son.

What vs. 15 means is when Isaiah’s child as infant or a toddler, can distinguish between the mild taste of curds (substance of milk obtained by coagulation, like cottage cheese) and the appreciate the harsher taste of honey, Jerusalem will be safe from a military attack from the Northern Kingdom and Syria. This will occur in just a few years.

Isaiah’s child will eat mild foods like cottage cheese but being so young will spit out harsher tasting foods like honey. As the child grows and matures in developing his taste in food, he will be able to eat honey. The prophecy to Ahaz is when the Isaiah's child matures and can consume honey, the threat of Jerusalem will be no more.

The prophecy is strictly tied to a time in the future when Shear-jashub has the ability to consume honey— the Hebraism -- to refuse evil and choose good.

Within a few years of this prophecy, Shear-jashub is able to eat honey. Through God's providence, Assyria conquers the Northern Kingdom and Syria and took them into captivity. The last part of vs. 16 prophecy refers to this: "the land whose two kings you dread will be forsaken."

God saves Jerusalem through the sign of Isaiah's son.

Isaiah 7 has nothing to do with the sinlessness or guiltlessness of infants or toddlers. It is not a proof text for the Age of Accountability.
 
Last edited:

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The Text

14) Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel.​
15) He will eat curds and honey at the time He knows enough to refuse evil and choose good.​
16) For before the boy will know enough to refuse evil and choose good, the land whose two kings you dread will be forsaken.​


Many credobaptists see the remedy of infant salvation in the Age of Accountability and use Isaiah 7 as evidence. Some believe when Isaiah’s son Shear-jashub is old enough to “refuse evil and choose good,” is the functional equivalent of guiltlessness or sinlessness before God prior to the "Age of Accountability."

I disagree. The age when the child “refuses evil and chooses good” is a Hebraism. It is much closer to the meaning of “maturity and immaturity” than “guiltlessness and sinlessness” of Isaiah’s child and the context bears this out.
1. We can agree that "all scripture is given by inspiration from God and is to be used for teaching/doctrine" 2 Tim 3:16
2. The text above does not say "before the child has done any evil"
3. The text does say "before the child knows enough to refuse evil and choose good" - which speaks of the ability of a child to comprehend abstract concepts like good vs evil and to know what each one is. And that implies some young age that must be beyond 1 or 2 or 3 etc.
4. Knowing that a parent will punish a child for doing a certain thing - is a more basic mental task than also knowing that a certain thing is itself "evil" or of evil origin. This means the child is beyond the point of just knowing that parents punish for doing certain things.

God considers all mankind to be fallen sinners (Rom 3:23 all have sinned) and in need of the Gospel until someone chooses the gospel. But before the person even has the ability to comprehend good vs evil or to know the abstract concept of gospel even is - God makes certain allowances.

"overlooking times of ignorance":

Acts 17:30 "Therefore having overlooked the times of ignorance, God is now declaring to men that all people everywhere should repent,"

In Gen 6 - God declares all mankind to be in such a depraved state of sin and rebellion that the world is judged for its sin/iniquity and the world of that age was destroyed in a flood. Judgment. so then God did not refuse to judge people as sinners prior to the NT - yet we see that some allowance is made for ignorance, in God's eyes.

John 9:41 Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would have no sin; but now you say, ‘We see.’ Therefore your sin remains.

Young children are in a special sense covered by that "ignorance" even by NT standards.

1 Cor 7: 13 And a woman who has a husband who does not believe, if he is willing to live with her, let her not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband; otherwise your children would be unclean, but now they are holy

The children of Christians even though not yet able to comprehend evil vs good - are covered by a special grace of God setting them apart - because of the Christian parent.
 
Upvote 0