You could say that if they were unwilling to do their job ( which it seems they were).So the well regulated militia was worthless.
The "Armed Right" would just say it was because of left-wing tyranny and see gun control as just the next step in reducing us to misery.I think that your "guns vs no guns" discussion is a red herring promoted by politicians so that nobody is demanding the real answers to questions:
a) why are so many Americans unhappy
b) why are so many Americans unhealthy
c) why so many Americans live in constant stress or fear
d) why people born in poor areas have so low chance to change their life
e) why are stable families disappearing and children left without a proper guide in life
Didn't Trump build the wall and have Mexico pay for it?
Meaning abortion rights with fewer limitations on those rights. Example, would be things like reasons for wanting an abortion or time limits on them.What are wide abortions?
I cannot recall even one example from history where guns between common folk helped them against tyranny and the regime the people established after that was better.The "Armed Right" would just say it was because of left-wing tyranny and see gun control as just the next step in reducing us to misery.
I would be hesitant to say any law in the US can be called draconian. using the term without rational cause suggests hyperbole and bias. the topic at hand is gun control and certainly, we can look at all the problems all at once but that would be out of the scope of this thread.As demonstrated, Blue states are more prone to breeding a culture of murder. They also tens to have the most draconian gun laws, and the highest tolerance for drug abuse. How do you propose we change that culture?
As far as I remember I have never heard that. I have heard it being blamed ( along with the increasing violence on increasing secularized society.The "Armed Right" would just say it was because of left-wing tyranny and see gun control as just the next step in reducing us to misery.
It was a terrific wall, too. Able to be cut through in minutes with a $49.95 saber saw available at convienient Home Depot locations across Northen Mexico.Trump built a wall for about 25% of our border, over what already existed. Biden stopped it;
A home-grown gang. Maybe we shouldn't have deported them.and now criminals, including MS-13, are pouring over our borders.
Who is "us?"Now some on the Left are calling to disarm us in the face of this wave of criminals.
We should of course deport the non-citizens who are part of the gang. If particular members are citizens (homegrown) then of course we do not deport those particular people.It was a terrific wall, too. Able to be cut through in minutes with a $49.95 saber saw available at convienient Home Depot locations across Northen Mexico.A home-grown gang. Maybe we shouldn't have deported them.Who is "us?"
Trump built a wall for about 25% of our border, over what already existed.
Biden stopped it; and now criminals, including MS-13, are pouring over our borders. Now some on the Left are calling to disarm us in the face of this wave of criminals.
increased gun control could be argued as a bandaid solution that doesn't really address the root of the issue, instead only treating the symptoms. violent culture is a more complex issue and the quick answer is the symptoms are easier to tackle. but I do think taking away some of the tools of violence not only reduces the violence itself but will impact the cultural elements as well since there would be less exposure.The culture that needs changing is one of violence since as I have stated many times truly mass shootings actually take very few lives. It is more common ( behind suicide) for people to shoot others either in the course of another crime or what I refer to as a homicide that would happen one way or another ( because the shooter wanted someone else dead badly enough it would not matter how.
yes, and those places have stricter gun laws ( where permitted ( in other words they usually cannot break state laws in the process, yet more crime. Yes people are tighter together, but still in terms of violence there are way more people who will respond to violence with violence than there are that start violence. Most of the people who start the violence either do not care or there are already laws that are meant to limit their access to guns.I agree that there is more crime in large cities. Blue states are more urban. So your answer is to give these city residents an acre and a mule in Idaho?
In truth, the gun laws that work for those mule owners don't work in large urban areas--and people in cities aren't as isolated. They have a broad infrastructure of civil services to keep the peace, fight fires, transport them to hospitals.
I am sure crime is high in Houston. Miami. Atlanta.
I would be hesitant to say any law in the US can be called draconian.
What we really need to address is mental health as two in three gun deaths are actually suicides.increased gun control could be argued as a bandaid solution that doesn't really address the root of the issue, instead only treating the symptoms. violent culture is a more complex issue and the quick answer is the symptoms are easier to tackle. but I do think taking away some of the tools of violence not only reduces the violence itself but will impact the cultural elements as well since there would be less exposure.
For the record, most if not all states do not have duty to retreat in your own home, now they may have stricter laws as to when no duty to retreat applies or they may open the person up to civil liablability ( either in the form of wrongful death suits or otherwise lawsuits, but I believe that all sates have at least some form of castle doctineYou're entitled to your opinion. I'm entitled to mine.
When someone tells me that I have to go into a gang ridden neighborhood, to collect cash; and I can't carry a gun to protect myself from armed gangsters; then that is a draconian law IMO.
When someone tells me that I can't defend human life on my own property, when shots and screams are echoing throughout my neighborhood; then that is a draconian law IMO.
When someone breaks into my home with a gun in his hand; and I am told that I have a duty to retreat; then that is a draconian law IMO.
That's terrible. What state do you live in?You're entitled to your opinion. I'm entitled to mine.
When someone tells me that I have to go into a gang ridden neighborhood, to collect cash; and I can't carry a gun to protect myself from armed gangsters; then that is a draconian law IMO.
When someone tells me that I can't defend human life on my own property, when shots and screams are echoing throughout my neighborhood; then that is a draconian law IMO.
When someone breaks into my home with a gun in his hand; and I am told that I have a duty to retreat; then that is a draconian law IMO.
I do think taking away some of the tools of violence not only reduces the violence itself but will impact the cultural elements as well since there would be less exposure.