NDAs Kept These Christians Silent. Now They’re Speaking Out Against Them.

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
166,315
56,041
Woods
✟4,654,449.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
A wave of activists across countries and denominations is calling for the end to non-disclosure and confidentiality clauses.


A growing number of ministers, missionaries, Christian workers, abuse victims, and victims’ advocates are publicly objecting to the non-disclosure agreements and confidentiality clauses used by major religious organizations. They say the legal tools that were designed to protect tech industry “trade secrets” are widely misused to conceal abuse, preserve secrets, and protect powerful reputations without regard for the human cost.

On Wednesday, an international group of them launched a campaign to end “the misuse of non-disclosure agreements,” called NDAs, with a website and the hashtag #NDAfree.

“It’s time to set people free,” said Lee Furney, one of the organizers of #NDAfree and a British expat who lives in Malawi and works to support churches there. Furney played a key role in exposing the sexual abuse of evangelical Anglican leader Jonathan Fletcher, and has become an advocate for abuse survivors.

“In some ways, an NDA can look reasonable,” he told CT. “But find for me the perfect NDA, and it’s still not perfect. There’s no transparency. No accountability. You can’t track them or how they’re used. And they’re binding the conscience for the future, saying I can’t change my mind, regardless of the situation.”

Continued below.
NDAs Kept These Christians Silent. Now They’re Speaking Out Against Them.
 
Jun 26, 2003
8,127
1,189
Visit site
✟258,241.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
People can’t be forced to sign NDAs They are enticed by the promise of cash or other compensation. If your conscience compels you, do not sign them. If you do, then it is a sell out.
If you really want to stop NDAs, give the money back, say what you will and take the consequences which could include further compensation to the aggrieved party above giving the money back

it seems to me and I could be wrong, but those whining about NDAs are having sell out remorse, like they did not get enough money
 
Upvote 0