- Mar 25, 2020
- 1,345
- 479
- 45
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Celibate
"The Grace and Truth Paradox."
Does it talk about the teachings of Jesus?
Upvote
0
"The Grace and Truth Paradox."
Define what is a fake Christian.
I’ll have to look into that! I haven’t read a lot of theological stuff, but this sounds really interesting.I have a book by Randy Alcorn called "The Grace and Truth Paradox." It is a highly recommended read. It's a short book and easy read, but packed with truth.
Most people who talk about their fasting would not think of it as boasting, and yet even with that explanation, it's not what Jesus said. He didn't said (or imply) that it's okay to talk about your fasting so long as you believe you're not boasting; he said don't do it. The question is, are we prepared to obey? That so many people struggle with this teaching is, in itself, a demonstration that Jesus was on to something.
This argument that it's okay to talk about fasting, praying, and charity giving so long as one does not boast about it while doing so is like an alcoholic saying, "I can stop any time I want".
Honestly, it changed my outlook on a lot of things. It was required reading when I was asked to be an RA at Bible College. I kept the book afterwards because it was so good.I’ll have to look into that! I haven’t read a lot of theological stuff, but this sounds really interesting.
It is a very Christ-centered book. It talks about Jesus. It probably talks about the teachings of Jesus, too.Does it talk about the teachings of Jesus?
but how would someone who has to turn down an invite to a meal explain their absence? i mean, i dont believe in lying,
Even saying, "I don't fast" is letting us know something that should be secret. Whether you personally do or don't fast is none of our business; that should only be between you and God. That's what Jesus taught.
As for lying, motivation is what God looks at; why we do the things we do.
People tend to view honesty in whichever way suits them in the moment. In this case you think dishonesty is not okay because it means you've got a reason to talk about your fasting if someone asks. Instead of making up an excuse you "cannot tell a lie" and end up blabbing about your fasting.
But, in some other context, like when someone asks, "how was your day", you may feel it's acceptable to say, "okay" instead of launching into a long explanation as to how not-okay it really was.
One of the most classic hypotheticals is the ax-murderer scenario, where a stranger comes to your door and asks you to hide him from an ax-murderer who's chasing him. When the murderer comes to you door and asks if you've seen the intended victim, do you say yes or no? Most people would say "no" on the grounds that the deception in this case was for a good reason; it was right to lie in this case whereas in other circumstances it would not be right to lie. Recognizing the difference is what we call wisdom.
It may be much more difficult to keep your fasting secret from someone you live with, but when you really believe Jesus meant what he said, you'll think more deeply about why he said it, and you'll want to find ways to practice his teachings instead of looking for loopholes.
Even saying, "I don't fast" is letting us know something that should be secret. Whether you personally do or don't fast is none of our business; that should only be between you and God. That's what Jesus taught.
As for lying, motivation is what God looks at; why we do the things we do.
People tend to view honesty in whichever way suits them in the moment. In this case you think dishonesty is not okay because it means you've got a reason to talk about your fasting if someone asks. Instead of making up an excuse you "cannot tell a lie" and end up blabbing about your fasting.
But, in some other context, like when someone asks, "how was your day", you may feel it's acceptable to say, "okay" instead of launching into a long explanation as to how not-okay it really was.
One of the most classic hypotheticals is the ax-murderer scenario, where a stranger comes to your door and asks you to hide him from an ax-murderer who's chasing him. When the murderer comes to you door and asks if you've seen the intended victim, do you say yes or no? Most people would say "no" on the grounds that the deception in this case was for a good reason; it was right to lie in this case whereas in other circumstances it would not be right to lie. Recognizing the difference is what we call wisdom.
It may be much more difficult to keep your fasting secret from someone you live with, but when you really believe Jesus meant what he said, you'll think more deeply about why he said it, and you'll want to find ways to practice his teachings instead of looking for loopholes.
It probably talks about the teachings of Jesus, too.
But, overall, it talks about how grace and truth must walk hand-in-hand while sharing the gospel. It goes about other things. It was also 2014 when I read it.
I always recommend the book. I think it's a great tool.Hi SYL. Thanks for clarifying that. Grace and truth certainly are important topics and if the book encouraged you then that's fantastic. It's just that so many people rarely talk about the teachings of Jesus. They know 7 different ways to say love in Hebrew or Greek, they know 20 different names for Jesus, they've read the bible cover to cover 10 times, they practice various rituals, they worship on the correct day, they know the correct name for God, they can talk at length about the wonderful, saving, blood-washed, grace-filled, salvation of God, but they don't talk about Jesus' expectations for his followers.
if the question is what it means to be luke-warm, what is a real Christian, and how to spot fake Christians, it makes perfect sense to use the teachings of Jesus as the standard, which means anyone who is talking about jesus but not referring to his teachings is pretty suspicious. Maybe they just don't realize it, but when the topic is raised and people either brush it aside as though there is some other more important issue God looks at, or they argue against obedience to his teachings, then that is very telling.
Hi SYL. Thanks for clarifying that. Grace and truth certainly are important topics and if the book encouraged you then that's fantastic. It's just that so many people rarely talk about the teachings of Jesus. They know 7 different ways to say love in Hebrew or Greek, they know 20 different names for Jesus, they've read the bible cover to cover 10 times, they practice various rituals, they worship on the correct day, they know the correct name for God, they can talk at length about the wonderful, saving, blood-washed, grace-filled, salvation of God, but they don't talk about Jesus' expectations for his followers.
if the question is what it means to be luke-warm, what is a real Christian, and how to spot fake Christians, it makes perfect sense to use the teachings of Jesus as the standard, which means anyone who is talking about jesus but not referring to his teachings is pretty suspicious. Maybe they just don't realize it, but when the topic is raised and people either brush it aside as though there is some other more important issue God looks at, or they argue against obedience to his teachings, then that is very telling.
I'm not sure if it's entirely good for beginning Christians, but you can always check it out and see if you like it! I will always encourage growth in your walk with Christ!I might read that book as i am young in my journey with God. might be a good basic book for me to start out on?
Hi SYL. Thanks for clarifying that. Grace and truth certainly are important topics and if the book encouraged you then that's fantastic. It's just that so many people rarely talk about the teachings of Jesus. They know 7 different ways to say love in Hebrew or Greek, they know 20 different names for Jesus, they've read the bible cover to cover 10 times, they practice various rituals, they worship on the correct day, they know the correct name for God, they can talk at length about the wonderful, saving, blood-washed, grace-filled, salvation of God, but they don't talk about Jesus' expectations for his followers.
If the question is what does it mean to be luke-warm?, what is a real Christian?, or how to spot fake Christians?, it makes perfect sense to use the teachings of Jesus as the standard, which means anyone who is talking about jesus but not referring to his teachings is pretty suspicious. Maybe they just don't realize it, but when the topic is raised and people either brush it aside as though there is some other more important issue God looks at, or they argue against obedience to his teachings, then that is very telling.
I'm not sure if it's entirely good for beginning Christians, but you can always check it out and see if you like it! I will always encourage growth in your walk with Christ!
There's this interesting dichotomy about the state of the church today. A lot of us are (rightly) concerned about the "fake Christians," the lukewarm, the "easy-believeism" folks. And it's a good thing; we need to teach truth alongside grace. That can be a really hard balance. There are movements going on that are seeking to combat the idea of complacency and prosperity gospel that are going on today, and it's a good thing that they exist.
But I think there's a problem there, too.
These responsive movements can be a little harsh. I understand the thought process: if people are being complacent and abusing grace and settling for a feel-good faith with no sense of discipline, then discipline is what they need. Discipline, rebuke, reality, tough love, red pill. But that often turns to dismissal, nastiness, and a sense of superiority masked as humility. It's very easy, in our correction of people, to view them as the enemy instead of our brothers and sisters. We end up being judgmental in a non-constructive way. "Are you one of those fake Christians?" And we guilt-trip people and make them feel bad instead of winning them back with love. Sometimes, in our efforts to balance truth and grace, we go too far and stop showing grace.
I've seen this bleed into how we deal with people who are struggling and doubting. We too easily can end up like Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar: accusing our brothers and sisters, urging them to seek correction instead of giving them a hand when they need it. Sometimes we do need to repent of sin when we're struggling. We often do. But we also need to let people know that it's okay to be honest about their feelings and struggles because God shows us time and time again that He has grace for those seasons.
All of this is meant well. And, again, I in no way mean to imply we shouldn't exercise rebuke or hard truth when it's needed. But I think we need to figure out how to engage with people and figure out what that specific person needs to hear. That's what Jesus did; there were times when He rebuked and times that He healed. What helps you grow in Christ may not be what your brother needs.
One of my favorite pastors puts it very well here and here.
Grace and truth means truth and grace. It's a tricky balance, and I don't expect people to do it perfectly because we're all learning and growing in Christ. But we should do the best we can to help our brothers and sisters. People are all projects, works in progress, but they're also people.
Oh, 100%. I’ve been doing research into the prosperity gospel lately. It’s sickening.But to those who preach the false American gospel of success and prosperity and are leading people away from Christ and even fooling those who do believe, I think we need to stand up and speak out firm on that. It is heresy after all. When Christ rebuked the priests in His time on earth it was not soft spoken with grace was it? On minor matters of doctrinal differences this is on thing, on heresy another. I can speak softly with my brother if we disagree on the process of baptism but not on the fundamental Gospel of Christ or the substitution of prosperity for the fullness of Christ.
"Why do you call me Lord, but do not obey me"? Luke 6:46