Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,496
7,861
...
✟1,192,667.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yeah, I have to say that thus far I disagree with cessationism. I understand that people interpret things that way. While I agree that the miracles, signs, and wonders type of thing was for the early church, and were primarily to reach the Jewish people, I feel that the idea that many prophetic gifts and dreams are foretold for this time as well and we're also encouraged to desire them. Having said that, though, I do have to say that many things I've experienced in the so-called spirit-filled churches has seemed to be bordering on, if not fully fallen into, apostasy: barking like dogs, rolling (writhing) around on the floor, behaving hysterically, getting "high" or "drunk in the spirit," focusing on too many details of the things afoot in the spirit world, focusing on miracles, doing healing missions in a big lather of spectacle, going on whatever they feel the Lord is doing without checking themselves against Scripture and the counsel of brethren, going on missions and doing any sort of activities without consulting the Bible daily, if not moment to moment. Another thing I have wrestled with a lot is how often and when to speaking in tongues. I would never want to in any way quell a gift of the Holy Spirit, but I feel that there are so many Scriptural references that seem to support both doing so a lot and doing so only in very specific times and ways - and there seems to be a great deal of argument among many Christian scholars and ministers about this as well. I tend to err on the side of only doing so when there is someone to interpret, but that is a hard one. It seems that there is at the very least a line between proper glossolalia and in corrupting a Holy gift for what would amount to little more than engaging in a form of vain babbling. Of course, the cessationists would argue that the time for tongues is past... That is a hard one, but ultimately it would seem that one needn't ever necessarily engage in tongues in order to preach the gospel and follow Jesus. I've come to understand that none of us will ever - in this lifetime anyway - know everything well enough and we are all in a continual process. So, I'm not judging even those who may be in error on any point, as I have been in error myself, and from the vantage point of today, I might view the me of yesterday/ yesteryear a fool by comparison, and may feel similarly about the me of today in the future. And of course even the best of us are all far below and behind God and His understanding. So, I just do my best to discern and speak what I have come to understand, and refrain from what I know to be wrong and advise accordingly as needed, but all in openness and humility as best I can.

As for what I'd be doing, I would not be focusing on miracles, etc., except of course if God might in some rare instance want to do one through me or otherwise - but, as you say, He could do so with anyone. As far as gifts go, I'd be focused on healing, providing words of knowledge and prophetic words when given them, and deliverance, but the main point of the ministry would mostly be speaking to people about the truth of Jesus, especially those on the fence about God or who are very far away from Him, to try to make sure they are reached out to. I was very far away from Him and spoke against Him with alacrity, but He yet saved me. I could speak to such folks from a place of understanding, and that understanding could enhance my ability to use the words the Holy Spirit might give me in the moment. (I.e., any willing servant could receive and give the words he Holy Spirit provides, but if they involve a dialect or context, etc., that the person has no familiarity with, he or she will not be as well able to speak them clearly and convincingly.) It's really about sharing His Good news with love and care and empathy.

Not everyone had the gift of tongues in the early church. Paul says, do all speak in tongues? (See: 1 Corinthians 12:30). Most Charismatics and Pentecostals believe all can speak in tongues (Which is contrary to Scripture). Many of them also believe in a private prayer language in tongues. This is nowhere to be found in Scripture. Several verses are taken out of context in 1 Corinthians 14 to make this teaching work. It is not clearly spelled out in Scripture. Tongues was for the express purpose of outreach and edification. Again, this comes back to doing things to what God's Word says specifically.

Do you see the ordination process and believers speaking in a big building the normative way of how they reached the lost and had fellowship in the Bible? I don't see that. Ultimately we are all going to have to face our Lord and give an account or answer to Him. Did we do our own thing by looking to what religious church men do, or did we stick with what His Word alone says. I would rather stick to what God's Word says alone and play it safe. This life is too short to play games with my soul. I don't want there to be any level of disobedience between me and my Lord.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,496
7,861
...
✟1,192,667.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Thanks. Yeah, I hear you and have come to a similar place in my process as regards concerning oneself with what other men do by sight, etc. Not totally but to a large degree, vis-a-vis a lot of so-called ordained ministry and ministers. It would seem that much of that is so far (too far) removed from the methods and practices of the early church...

Yeah, I also agree re not adding to Scripture. Neither add anything nor take anything away. I generally regard visions, etc., as a way God sometimes prompts one to go to Scripture and hear anew the words he or she has heard but not fully heard, or a means of helping one communicate to people about Jesus, the Word. I.e., Paul didn't just quote the Bible, he used many of his own words/ verbiage to explain to people about Jesus and how He saved/ saves, and Jesus' Scriptural truth, using many words of the language people spoke, language, what he'd experienced, etc. Similarly, we can't just stand on a street quoting Scripture without also speaking accompanying sentences, etc., employing dialectic, etc. So, similarly, I think that as long as visions, etc., do no more than serve such a purpose, they aren't adding. I could be wrong, but this is how I've come to understand things thus far. In any case, yes, I absolutely agree that no words employed to speak the gospel to people should be presented as anything like Scripture or as more important than God's Word, nor to be treated in such a way as to try to add to Scripture. Anythign that doesn't drive people TO the Bible is useless and can't serve Jesus.

Okay. Imagine you had a dream or vision from the Lord. In this dream, you see a colonial boat, and some birds, and the sun shining. You eventually see a cross in the water, and feel a great peace in your soul, and you wake up. Now, you can take this as a holy message to your congregation. You can say that this dream was from God. So then, somebody then writes down your words, and prints out a new Bible with a new 67th book in the Bible called "The Book of Robbio" based of your experience seeing that you said your dream was from God. Note: Today it is easy to print out new books. So would you approve? The point here is that we cannot say that our dreams or visions are on equal authority with Scripture. Sure, it could have been from God, but we really do not know. What we do know is the Bible is true. This is the only word we truly need from the Lord. It is His Word that revives us and not our own experiences.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0