If that were true, then we wouldn't have this kind of statistical breakdown in terms of the age of the children entering into the foster care system.
Children entering foster care by age group | KIDS COUNT Data Center
20% of the kids who enter are under age of 1
30% are between 1-5
According to another source:
In fiscal year 2017, infants entered foster care at a rate of 6.6 per 1,000, more than twice the 2.8 rate of children ages 4 to 17.
Yes, they're might be parents looking to scoop up an infant, but that really only addresses the age aspect I spoke of, it doesn't address the other to points about racial preferences, and preferences pertaining to special needs status.
It also doesn't address the fact that there are numerous gay couples looking to adopt (they actually are six times more likely to adopt than heterosexual couples), and 12 states (which also happen to contain 3 of the top 5 state rates of children entering the foster care system) allow religious organizations to run adoption agencies and deny adoptions to gay couples. In fact, according to some data, in some of those states, only 1 out 5 same sex adoption attempts were successful with the other 4 out of 5 being denied. If they really wanted to present adoption as a viable alternative to abortion, they'd cut it out with that because all that's doing is highlighting that this:
...seems to offend them more than abortion or a child growing up in the "system" for their entire lives.
When it comes to children entering the foster care system, the breakdown by race is as follows:
23 percent were Black or African-American. 21 percent were Hispanic (of any race). 9 percent were other races or multiracial.
Given that the abortion rates are highest among the groups that enter the adoption system and are the least likely to be adopted,
Abortion rates by race and ethnicity
...it's not entirely untrue to say that if a black woman is considering abortion, if she carries to term, and puts the newborn in the foster care system, there's a statistically significant chance the baby won't be adopted. Not using that as a justification for abortion...however, the inverse logic of "you should carry to term and put the baby up for adoption, because there are people who will adopt them right away" is not true in many cases.
I understand there's a strong religious objection to abortion, and I understand the reasons why...however, I don't think people should resort to misleading information in order to influence a person's decision one way or the other.