Why the Baptism with the Holy Spirit is not for Today

Status
Not open for further replies.

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
27,914
7,993
NW England
✟1,053,319.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But, nowhere does it say he does this apart from the 12 Apostles or the two outpourings. This is the point than proves all other ideas about the Holy Spirit today are false doctrine.

Nowhere does it say that the only sign of baptism in the Spirit is speaking in tongues, and that there will be no need for this after the Apostles have died.

The prophecy in Joel said "I will pour out my Spirit on ALL people." The one in Ezekiel said that God would put his Spirit in his people, and Jeremiah sad the New Covenant would be that all people would know the Lord, Jeremiah 31:31, and his word would be in them.
 
Upvote 0

~Zao~

Wisdom’s child
Site Supporter
Jun 27, 2007
3,060
957
✟100,595.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Nowhere does it say that the only sign of baptism in the Spirit is speaking in tongues, and that there will be no need for this after the Apostles have died.

The prophecy in Joel said "I will pour out my Spirit on ALL people." The one in Ezekiel said that God would put his Spirit in his people, and Jeremiah sad the New Covenant would be that all people would know the Lord, Jeremiah 31:31, and his word would be in them.
Speaking in tongues wasn’t a factor in Acts 8 nor was Ananias one of the 12 apostles when laying hands on Saul/Paul.
 
Upvote 0

Johan_1988

Active Member
Jun 17, 2019
321
176
36
Durban
✟30,451.00
Country
South Africa
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
I would really have to disagree on this one Dave. The baptism of the Holy Spirit is a infilling of the Spirit of God. It is itself a gift that God gives ,not to all persons I would say, scripture makes this clear in certain cases. How can you call one a baptism and another a gift, since both are being filled with the Spirit and in both cases people spoke in tongues. It was just named one or the other and scripture proves the are the same.

Here is the proof from scripture:

Matt 3:11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:

John was speaking about Jesus here obviously and he is speaking to a general audience not to specific people.

Here is what Jesus said before he ascended to heaven:

Acts 1:4 And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me.
Acts 1:5 For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence.

Jesus never once mentioned a pouring out of a baptism and a gift. He just called it a baptism. It's also called a gift simply because it's freely given by God.

Here Peter calls the baptism of the Holy Spirit a gift:

Acts 11:15 And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning.
Acts 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.
Acts 11:17 Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as he did unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God?


Filled with the Holy Spirit and then spoke in tongues. No difference.

Acts 2:4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.

Acts 10:45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Acts 10:46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,

Acts 19:6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,876
USA
✟580,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Nowhere does it say that the only sign of baptism in the Spirit is speaking in tongues, and that there will be no need for this after the Apostles have died.

The prophecy in Joel said "I will pour out my Spirit on ALL people." The one in Ezekiel said that God would put his Spirit in his people, and Jeremiah sad the New Covenant would be that all people would know the Lord, Jeremiah 31:31, and his word would be in them.
You need to show from scripture your sentiments. Only the Apostles could minister the Baptism with the Holy Spirit apart from the two outpourings, proven in the OP.
 
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
27,914
7,993
NW England
✟1,053,319.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You need to show from scripture your sentiments. Only the Apostles could minister the Baptism with the Holy Spirit apart from the two outpourings, proven in the OP.

John the Baptist told the Jews at the Jordan that the One who came after him would baptise them with the Holy Spirit. He did not describe what that would be like or how they would know that it had happened, and did not mention tongues.
Jesus told the 11 disciples that they would be baptised with the Holy Spirit in a few days; he did not say "you will know this is true because you will speak in tongues, and in fact the only evidence of baptism in the Spirit is tongues."
Paul laid hands on people and they received the Spirit and spoke in tongues. Yes, Paul was an Apostle but you have previously insisted that it had to be one of the 12 that did this.

Perhaps you have a special definition of "baptism in the Spirit"?
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,876
USA
✟580,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
John the Baptist told the Jews at the Jordan that the One who came after him would baptise them with the Holy Spirit. He did not describe what that would be like or how they would know that it had happened, and did not mention tongues.
Jesus told the 11 disciples that they would be baptised with the Holy Spirit in a few days; he did not say "you will know this is true because you will speak in tongues, and in fact the only evidence of baptism in the Spirit is tongues."
Paul laid hands on people and they received the Spirit and spoke in tongues. Yes, Paul was an Apostle but you have previously insisted that it had to be one of the 12 that did this.

Perhaps you have a special definition of "baptism in the Spirit"?
All believers have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. In OT times the Spirit was with the born again, faith is a fruit of the Holy Spirit. But in Acts we see two distinct groups. All believers have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, but only those who were in the two outpourings, or those whom the Apostles laid hands on, had the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues.

““As for me, I baptize you with water for repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, and I am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.” Matthew 3:11 (NASB95)

You = 2nd person plural which pertained to John' immediate audience. And this happened as foretold.
 
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
27,914
7,993
NW England
✟1,053,319.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
All believers have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, but only those who were in the two outpourings, or those whom the Apostles laid hands on, had the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues.

So you've said; I disagree.

““As for me, I baptize you with water for repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, and I am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.” Matthew 3:11 (NASB95)

You = 2nd person plural which pertained to John' immediate audience. And this happened as foretold.

John's immediate audience were those who came to the Jordan and repented of their sins.
But after this, in Matthew 3:7 ->, he is speaking to the Pharisees and Sadducees. In verse 12 he speaks of judgement.
 
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,592
Northern Ohio
✟314,577.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Not all are Apostles. In fact none are Apostles since John's death.
We still have Apostolic Authority today. I remember in the Episcopal Church we go through the membership class. Then the Bishop comes out and he personally lays hands on people and blesses them when they become a member of the church. We also have a book of common prayer that is used by more then one denomination.
 
Upvote 0

Ozarks Prodigal

Member
Site Supporter
Jul 31, 2019
18
12
Ozarks
✟32,196.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Why the Baptism with the Holy Spirit is not for Today

Understanding the Baptism with the Holy Spirit in Acts is difficult. But I found the keys are the Ethiopian Eunuch Acts 8:27 and the Samarians Acts 8:5. In essence, all had the Holy Spirit but only the Samarians had the Baptism with the Holy Spirit.

These received the gift of the Holy Spirit according to Peter in Acts 2:28 just as we do today. But the Samarians also received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit through the apostle’s hands which the Eunuch did not.

On Pentecost God baptized the 12 Apostles with the Holy Spirit who also spoke in tongues. According to Acts 2:38 the eunuch and the Samarians had the gift of the Holy Spirit through Philip’s preaching. But Philip could not provide the baptism of the Holy Spirit for either. Acts reveals that beyond the two outpourings, only the Apostles through the laying on of their hands could baptize people in the Holy Spirit. It was the proof of apostleship Hebrews 2:4.

When the Apostles visited the Samarian converts, they laid their hands on them baptizing them in the Holy Spirit. But this was not the case with the Eunuch. It says he went on his way rejoicing after Philip baptized him in water.

So the Samarians and the Eunuch received the gift of the Holy Spirit through Philip’s preaching. But only the Samarians received the baptism with the Holy Spirit through the Apostles’ hands.

About 7 years later, God poured out the Holy Spirit on the gentiles at Cornelius’ house which resulted in their speaking in tongues just as the Apostles did at Pentecost.

Scripture doesn’t mention the 3000 converts on the day of Pentecost as baptized with the Holy Spirit. Nor the 5,000 converts days later. But we might assume those whom the Apostles baptized in water also received the baptism with the Holy Spirit through their hands. But anyone baptized by someone other than an apostle would have been like the Eunuch who received only the gift of the Holy Spirit.

Later, Paul preached to the disciples at Ephesus Acts 19:1. These like the Eunuch received the gift of the Holy Spirit. But they also received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit through the apostle’s hands the same way the Samarians did.

The Baptism with the Holy Spirit provided God’s word through tongues and prophecy until the New Testament canon became complete. How do we know this? Paul says scripture thoroughly equips us 2 Timothy 3:17. Paul said tongues and prophecy provided only partial knowledge 1 Corinthians 13:9. So it makes sense scripture replaced them when completed.

Beyond Acts, the Corinthians no doubt received the Baptism with the Holy Spirit through Paul’s hands. And Paul mentioned he wanted to visit the Romans to give spiritual gifts to them too Romans 1:11. Paul mentions laying his hands on Timothy who also received a gift 2 Timothy 1:6.

So we can say scripture directly supports the Baptism of the Holy Spirit for those ministered to by an apostle. That it was not for all. The Baptism with the Holy Spirit passed into history with the rest of the apostles Hebrews 2:4 because only they provided it as a sign of their authority. And that scripture replaced the fragmentary gifts of tongues and prophecy with the completed revelation. And we can confidently say believers from Pentecost on have the gift of Holy Spirit according to Acts 2:38, but not the Baptism with the Holy Spirit. Just as the Eunuch and believers since then.

When I read your message above, I about fell out of the chair... this part of the country, Missouri Ozarks, is absolutely full of charismatic churches so I'm guessing there's a lot of that spread around the nation also. When I saw the title, it took about one two seconds to register what was being said and I decided immediately I wanted to follow this thread all the way through.

Have a blessed day...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dave L
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Steven Beck

Active Member
Mar 26, 2017
327
130
67
Australia
✟28,787.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Liberals
I gave the proof texts in the article.

Uhm no you gave opinion based on your interpretation. A proof text would actually state that the baptisms of the Holy Spirit was complete after the apostles which it says nowhere.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Strong in Him
Upvote 0

ByTheSpirit

Come Lord Jesus
May 17, 2011
11,429
4,658
Manhattan, KS
✟189,251.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Today's claims for the Baptism and the gifts are fraudulent but people are deceived and believe what they say.

Didn't answer my questions though:

Are people that teach these doctrines under a curse as Paul said would happen to those who teach false doctrine, and are those who claim to be baptized in the Spirit indeed under a different spirit?
 
Upvote 0

dqhall

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2015
7,547
4,171
Florida
Visit site
✟766,603.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
OT saints were born again but did not receive the Baptism with the Spirit until Pentecost. They are not the same.
No one can do good without God. Just as the wind blows down a mountain hollow with m
OT saints were born again but did not receive the Baptism with the Spirit until Pentecost. They are not the same.
John 3:8 World English Bible (WEB)
“The wind blows where it wants to, and you hear its sound, but don’t know where it comes from and where it is going. So is everyone who is born of the Spirit.”

You might not know whether a person born of the Spirit was also baptized in the Spirit. God knows everything. God can remember more about you than you can remember.
 
Upvote 0

Heart2Soul

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 25, 2017
1,135
1,041
Tulsa
✟158,650.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Sad commentary since many of those listening may not have been baptized by the Holy Spirit at all since they may not have believed. Repent of your blasphemy my friend. Good for your soul.
I was just wondering if the OP is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit....then I read your post.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Strange coincidence that this and the previous thread focus on baptism, as I was earlier today suddenly struck by a thought on the subject that I don't think I've ever heard discussed.


John 4:1-3(KJV)

When therefore the Lord knew how the Pharisees had heard that Jesus made and baptized more disciples than John, (Though Jesus himself baptized not, but his disciples,) He left Judaea, and departed again into Galilee.

John the Baptist made it very clear that there was a mighty distinction between his own baptism (with water) and Jesus' baptism (with the Holy Spirit and fire). Several of John's disciples left John and followed Jesus (which apparently did not bother John - "He must increase but I must decrease."). John, in his gospel states categorically that Jesus Himself did not baptize (with water), "but his disciples." In Acts 1 Jesus takes up baptism again, and He also makes a clear distinction between between John's baptism "with water" and the baptism with the Holy Spirit which his hearers would soon experience.

So the question that arose in my mind concerns Matthew 28:19
Go, then, to all peoples everywhere and make them my disciples: baptize them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit,...​

Which baptism is Jesus refering to? Why would He send them out to practise John's (water) baptism, when this was NOT His baptism, and when very shortly before this command, He had told them they would be shortly baptised with the Holy Spirit ... and which is exactly was John said would be different about Jesus' baptism. Surely, He would send His followers out to baptize with HIS baptism, rather than cousin John's ...? (and once more noting John the Apostle's clear statement that Jesus Himself did not baptize with water.)

There have been few practices that have caused more disunity among believers than baptism. And I do not wish to pour gas on the continuously smouldering coals of this issue. Still, I put out this question because I have never heard or read any one raise this angle. (Of course, I am not the most widely read person around.o_O )

There IS another baptism that Jesus Himself speaks of, and which I propose as more significant that most think, in the full context of the true meaning of baptism, and that is these passages ...

Luke 12:49-51
“I came to set the earth on fire, and how I wish it were already kindled! I have a baptism to receive, and how distressed I am until it is over! Do you suppose that I came to bring peace to the world? No, not peace, but division.

Matthew 20:22-23
But Jesus answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with? They say unto him, We are able.And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father.

Notice in Luke 12 the connection between baptism and fire, and recall John the baptist's words in Matt. 3 - above. Also note that Jesus speaks of a baptism He himself is "to receive," though He had already been baptised by John, and received the outward sign of the Holy Spirit at that time. Note also the words used. We generally think of (water) baptism as an act of obedience on our part: that is, it is something (at least if we are refering to adult baptism) we do/we request/we initiate and something to look forward to with joyful anticipation; (think of the Ethipian eunich who asked "it there any reason why I shouldn't be baptised?") Jesus in this passage uses the verb "receive" and He admits to being very distressed by it, until it's over. In Matthew Jesus makes the direct link between His cup, and His baptism, and obvious reference to his death. Given that we are to deny orselves, take up our crosses and follow him, baptism isn't simply a one-off ritual public confession of our identification with Christ in His death and resurrection. It is about our daily lives, our continous immersion in the Holy Spirit, so that "it is not me that lives, but Christ in me."

Which question? Which thought?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
rockytopva said:
I received it through the heart and not via the logic.
Only scripture will do.

I can offer that.

Hebrews 8:7-8
For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion to look for a second. For he finds fault with them when he says: “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah,

Jeremiah 31:31-34
“Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts.

Hebrews 9
15 Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant.

Hebrews 8
14 In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.

2 Corinthians 3
6 Who has made us competent to be ministers of a new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit. For the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.

2 Corinthians 3
Are we beginning to commend ourselves again? Or do we need, as some do, letters of recommendation to you, or from you? You yourselves are our letter of recommendation, written on our hearts, to be known and read by all. And you show that you are a letter from Christ delivered by us, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,876
USA
✟580,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
rockytopva said:
I received it through the heart and not via the logic.


I can offer that.

Hebrews 8:7-8
For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion to look for a second. For he finds fault with them when he says: “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah,

Jeremiah 31:31-34
“Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts.

Hebrews 9
15 Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant.

Hebrews 8
14 In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.

2 Corinthians 3
6 Who has made us competent to be ministers of a new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit. For the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.

2 Corinthians 3
Are we beginning to commend ourselves again? Or do we need, as some do, letters of recommendation to you, or from you? You yourselves are our letter of recommendation, written on our hearts, to be known and read by all. And you show that you are a letter from Christ delivered by us, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts.
This is the circumcised heart/new birth that all believers have. It is not the Baptism of the Holy Spirit unique to the 12 Apostles, and those whom they laid their hands on.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,876
USA
✟580,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
People teach baptism of the Holy Spirit is false teaching....is false teaching.
The challenge to you is in proving the Baptism, speaking in tongues and prophesying came in another way besides the two outpourings or through an Apostle's hands, using scripture only.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,876
USA
✟580,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No one can do good without God. Just as the wind blows down a mountain hollow with m

John 3:8 World English Bible (WEB)
“The wind blows where it wants to, and you hear its sound, but don’t know where it comes from and where it is going. So is everyone who is born of the Spirit.”

You might not know whether a person born of the Spirit was also baptized in the Spirit. God knows everything. God can remember more about you than you can remember.
All believers have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. In OT times the Spirit was with the born again, faith is a fruit of the Holy Spirit. But in Acts we see two distinct groups. All believers have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, but only those who were in the two outpourings, or those whom the Apostles laid hands on, had the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.