Mnuchin says Congress can't see Trump's tax returns

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
28,643
15,977
✟486,928.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Ahh... The good ole parsing words tactic.

Yeah, reading comprehension is an important step between reading something and repeating it to others.

They found no conspiracy, no collaboration no collusion, betweenTrump and Russia.

I still have no idea why you'd say this, given what is actually written in the report.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,796
✟247,431.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
You might want to read the part of the report where it says that the report doesn't discuss collusion because it isn't a well defined legal term before making false claims like this.

Collusion is a meaningless term in regards to the legal matter.

Conspiracy to do certain things is the criminal act and mueller did not reveal that there was a conspiracy to impact the election, between the russians and trumps campaign.
 
Upvote 0

Allandavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2016
8,056
6,929
70
Sydney
✟230,565.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
You believe that because you have been blinded by your ideology. Denial is strong with this one.

Oh, you can cure my ‘blindness’ and blow my ‘denial’ out of the water easily...

Just show me, anywhere, that Mueller makes the statement of Trump being cleared of collusion...!
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,552
6,068
64
✟337,377.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Yeah, reading comprehension is an important step between reading something and repeating it to others.



I still have no idea why you'd say this, given what is actually written in the report.

I still have no idea why you would hint the report says there was. It doesn't. Of course it's very typical of the left to double down on something even when their incorrect.

Where does the report say there was? If it doesn't say there was and doesn't provide evidence for then there wasn't any.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,552
6,068
64
✟337,377.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Oh, you can cure my ‘blindness’ and blow my ‘denial’ out of the water easily...

Just show me, anywhere, that Mueller makes the statement of Trump being cleared of collusion...!

Mueller provided no evidence or any statements indicating he was involved. If someone investigated you for homicide, but found no evidence that your mother committed homicide would you want people running around saying they didn't think she was cleared of homicide? I bet you and your family and friends, aquaintences would be saying she was cleared. Or would you be willing to stand up and say, well they didn't say she was cleared, they just didn't find any evidence that she did it.
 
Upvote 0

Allandavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2016
8,056
6,929
70
Sydney
✟230,565.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Mueller provided no evidence or any statements indicating he was involved. If someone investigated you for homicide, but found no evidence that your mother committed homicide would you want people running around saying they didn't think she was cleared of homicide? I bet you and your family and friends, aquaintences would be saying she was cleared. Or would you be willing to stand up and say, well they didn't say she was cleared, they just didn't find any evidence that she did it.

Exactly. Except that Mueller DID NOT investigate Trump and his cronies for “collusion”...! So, he could not have cleared them of “collusion”...

Let me help you....here are Mueller’s actual words...

“In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.”
 
Upvote 0

Allandavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2016
8,056
6,929
70
Sydney
✟230,565.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Let me help you further...

“Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

So, Mueller states that Trump Co. welcomed the stolen material from the Russians, but he “did not establish” that there had been a coordinated conspiracy. “Did not establish” is a long, long way from “cleared him”...!
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,552
6,068
64
✟337,377.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Exactly. Except that Mueller DID NOT investigate Trump and his cronies for “collusion”...! So, he could not have cleared them of “collusion”...

Let me help you....here are Mueller’s actual words...

“In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.”

You know it's interesting how you guys like to parse words as if it makes a difference. I know "collusion" is the narrative pushed by the media and members of the Democratic party or others that wanted Trump out. It's used as a generic term to cover all aspects of conspiracy, cooperation, cooberation, etc, etc. That way we don't have to toss out six different words when discussing the subject.

You just focus so hard on the word that you miss the point. Mueller didn't find evidence of Trump wrong doing with Russia and it's attempted meddling in the election. So, he was cleared.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,552
6,068
64
✟337,377.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Let me help you further...

“Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

So, Mueller states that Trump Co. welcomed the stolen material from the Russians, but he “did not establish” that there had been a coordinated conspiracy. “Did not establish” is a long, long way from “cleared him”...!

Only in your mind. Did not establish means he couldn't show he did. Therefore he's cleared. I couldn't establish your mother committed murder. Therefore she is cleared of that. Unless you want to claim she wasn't.
 
Upvote 0

Allandavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2016
8,056
6,929
70
Sydney
✟230,565.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
You know it's interesting how you guys like to parse words as if it makes a difference. I know "collusion" is the narrative pushed by the media and members of the Democratic party or others that wanted Trump out. It's used as a generic term to cover all aspects of conspiracy, cooperation, cooberation, etc, etc. That way we don't have to toss out six different words when discussing the subject.

You just focus so hard on the word that you miss the point. Mueller didn't find evidence of Trump wrong doing with Russia and it's attempted meddling in the election. So, he was cleared.

Excuse me....???

Who focuses on the word “collusion”...???

It’s the most frequent word out of Trump’s mouth...!

You’re funny...............almost.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Allandavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2016
8,056
6,929
70
Sydney
✟230,565.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Only in your mind. Did not establish means he couldn't show he did. Therefore he's cleared. I couldn't establish your mother committed murder. Therefore she is cleared of that. Unless you want to claim she wasn't.

No, she isn’t “cleared”. “Did not establish” means that, while you may have evidence that she murdered, you’ve assessed that the evidence isn’t enough to secure a conviction....
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,796
✟247,431.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Exactly. Except that Mueller DID NOT investigate Trump and his cronies for “collusion”...! So, he could not have cleared them of “collusion”...

Let me help you....here are Mueller’s actual words...

“In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.”

Why would mueller investigate, for something that is not a crime? Conspiracy, is far worse and is what he focused on.

Collusion happens between parties all the time, especially when the term is used in such a loose fashion as most media have portrayed it. One could make a legit argument, that clintons campaign, paid an attorney to hire people to get dirt on trump, by colluding with russians, which is where they got their information.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,552
6,068
64
✟337,377.00
Faith
Pentecostal
No, she isn’t “cleared”. “Did not establish” means that, while you may have evidence that she murdered, you’ve assessed that the evidence isn’t enough to secure a conviction....[/QUO

And yet the report says this.
American Hustle

The investigationvdid not establish that anything occurred. That's being cleared.
 
Upvote 0

Allandavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2016
8,056
6,929
70
Sydney
✟230,565.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
“But as the report makes clear, Trump and his senior advisers, including members of his family, were aware that the Kremlin was trying to help them, and, rather than sound the alarm to U.S. authorities, they were thrilled about the assistance.”
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,552
6,068
64
✟337,377.00
Faith
Pentecostal
“But as the report makes clear, Trump and his senior advisers, including members of his family, were aware that the Kremlin was trying to help them, and, rather than sound the alarm to U.S. authorities, they were thrilled about the assistance.”

Yet they did nothing wrong.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,058
16,810
Dallas
✟871,701.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Sorry, still no evidence of collusion.

Isn't it about time you guys stop repeating the "no collusion" mantra? The report makes clear that "collusion" isn't even a legal term and thus the Office of Special Counsel wasn't even looking for "collusion". Trump cleared of conspiracy, but there was more than enough to go after him for obstruction of justice.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,058
16,810
Dallas
✟871,701.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I don't think there is any fear at all. I think it's a battle of Will's here. Trump had been attacked from the left non-stop since his election. He's a fighter and not going to cooperate with those trying to attack him. That's his character. It's more along the lines of "you want this? You'll have to come and take it." It's not fear.

This hagiography isn't going to work on people who aren't his fans. The myth of what a tough guy he is just that. He's a blowhard who relies on lawyers to be his muscle for him. As he's discovering with the Europeans and Chinese, he bluff and bluster isn't going to work when he doesn't have the upper hand either by financially or legally bullying his opposition into submission.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: whatbogsends
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,552
6,068
64
✟337,377.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Isn't it about time you guys stop repeating the "no collusion" mantra? The report makes clear that "collusion" isn't even a legal term and thus the Office of Special Counsel wasn't even looking for "collusion". Trump cleared of conspiracy, but there was more than enough to go after him for obstruction of justice.

See post 88
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,552
6,068
64
✟337,377.00
Faith
Pentecostal
This hagiography isn't going to work on people who aren't his fans. The myth of what a tough guy he is just that. He's a blowhard who relies on lawyers to be his muscle for him. As he's discovering with the Europeans and Chinese, he bluff and bluster isn't going to work when he doesn't have the upper hand either by financially or legally bullying his opposition into submission.

That doesn't change a thing I said. It's his character to fight and not just cave.
 
Upvote 0