- Aug 2, 2018
- 231
- 108
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- AU-Democrats
I just put it up to what people would say. I read it before posting it and curious if anyone would even respond. I am glad you did. I felt like he dove a little deep too. Um like scuba diving deep.
I have studied this before and still have a headache from it, It is one of those "issues" that we can take or not take. I decided to take it literally and that is my standpoint.
I like deep water! But I agree with only the first section, because we can kinda connect the dots with nakedness , and the use of "Knew and Know". 215 brought in Leviticus.The difference in what Lots daughters did to him, was he did not know, and like twice! (Gen 19:30-38) It seems they may have got the idea from hearing about what happened to Noah-back in the day. So they decided to do this to their Dad-if we read between the lines.
Also, that it wasn't just a "look", seems to be in the text that said, "and he knew what his youngest son had done to him." Now, not that I speak of experience, but it seems to me you would know afterward if you were sodomized. And yes he cursed his seed, but he did not bless Ham either. This is significant, IMO. The other two sons have blessings.
Notice that Noah says, "Blessed be the Lord God of Shem." This is identifying the lineage the Messiah would come from- and Luke 3:36, and it could be that only Shem was truly saved. We know that Noah was saved (2nd Pet 2:5-7), but it makes me think that maybe the rest were not? Notice only Lot as shown as a righteous soul. We know that their "house" was spared, but it seems to me Ham and Lots wife and daughters are at least suspect. (Gen 18-19, Heb. 11) It's a nice rabbit trail though, IMO.
Upvote
0