Report: Social Security And Medicare Will Bankrupt America Faster Than We Thought

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,198
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,264.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No doubt, you know the full implications of my question.

had to look it up -- what a messy way to live to get involved in that kind of fraud.

Difference vs banking -- the bank plans/guesses what % of savers will withdraw money, and then additionally has agreements to get (overnight and longer) loans from other sources to cover any underavailability of cash as needed too. All clearly above board, and without deception. And it can even sell its loans as needed to reverse them in effect. Until there is an honest to goodness bank run, the bank never has any trouble covering legitimately and honestly. (not to imply no bankers ever break laws!)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,198
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,264.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why is it OK for one person (banks & bankers) but not OK for another person?

sorry, I finished up after you replied. See post #161 now (refresh page)
 
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟186,371.00
Marital Status
Private
had to look it up -- what a messy way to live to get involved in that kind of fraud.

Difference vs banking -- the bank plans what % of savers will withdraw money, and then additionally has agreements to get (overnight and longer) loans from other sources to cover any underavailability of cash as needed too. All clearly above board, and without deception. And it can even sell it's loans as needed to reverse them in effect. Until there is an honest to goodness bank run, the bank never has any trouble covering legitimately and honestly. (not to imply no bankers ever break laws!)
Reminds me of this quote:

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." - Frederic Bastiat
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,198
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,264.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Reminds me of this quote:

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." - Frederic Bastiat

:cool: Just so!

Witness the way the banks unwrote old legislation in the late 90s (under Clinton) and then went to town with wild speculation afterwards, ending in dumping their losses cleverly on AIG and such, and you and I bailing that part out. Clever and elaborate scheme. I'd guess Taibbi (Rolling Stone) had it right about Goldman Sacs, the 'vampire squid'.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ananda
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟186,371.00
Marital Status
Private
:cool: Just so!

Witness the way the banks unwrote old legislation in the late 90s (under Clinton) and then went to town with wild speculation afterwards, ending in dumping their losses cleverly on AIG and such, and you and I bailing that part out. Clever and elaborate scheme. I'd guess Taibbi (Rolling Stone) had it right about Goldman Sacs, the 'vampire squid'.
They're just doing god's work!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NightHawkeye
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
37,131
13,198
✟1,090,732.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Ever since the Republicans learned their foolish, unpaid-for, heavily tilted towards millionaires tax cuts would increase the deficit by more than $2 trillion over the next ten years they did what they usually do----send the bill for this boondoggle to the rest of us.

In short, they want to steal that $2 trillion out of the Social Security TRUST FUND.

It's called a trust fund for a reason--they have shown themselves to be untrustworthy to handle a trust fund. Shame on them wanting to steal from seniors, widows, orphans, and the disabled to finance a tax cut for millionaires.

This November, vote for someone you can trust to preserve the Social Security TRUST FUND.
 
Upvote 0

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟803,537.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Well, no, it's not. It's more like a compulsory government-run savings scheme with an insurance component.
I'd argue Social Security is a cross between a Ponzi scheme and a tax. Social Security is even universally referred to as a tax.

Unfortunately, Social Security is not a fully funded pension plan (which would eliminate the Ponzi scheme aspects).
 
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,821
9,817
✟312,047.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Unfortunately, Social Security is not a fully funded pension plan

Last year, Social Security made a profit of $44 billion, because it paid less in benefits than it collected in payroll tax. It has a total of $3 trillion in profits saved up in the bank.

It currently is fully funded, in that retiree benefits are equal to contributions plus interest.

Long-term, that won't last, because people are living longer, but a fairly modest cut to benefits and/or payroll tax increase will balance the books again.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

dogs4thewin

dog lover
Christian Forums Staff
Hands-on Trainee
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2012
30,374
5,614
32
Georgia U.S. State
✟896,872.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
There's only two truthful courses of action with socialist programs like SS/MC:

1. People get out slightly less than what they put in, or
2. People are promised more than they put in.​

If #1 is chosen, you might as well not have the program at all. Leave the money in the hands of the people instead of taking it from them, taking a cut for the program administrators, and returning it back later.

If #2 is chosen, gov't must ensure infinite growth in the people, which we know is impossible.

Otherwise - #3: if deception is involved in the creation of such programs - the pyramid scheme/program eventually collapses in on itself, leaving the people in the grips of civil war - while the initial recipients & program administrators make off like bandits. This third option seems to be the way we're headed.
One thing though is we have fewer people putting in any now. Back when it first started there were way more people putting in than taking out and on average people were taking out for shorter periods. Now, as people retire even without a disability program they are having fewer children and more for various reasons are choosing not to have any; while at the same time living longer which means they are taking out over a longer period well yeah it will run out of money, but as long as you have a certain number of more people putting in than taking out you will be good. It is like we are hurting ourselves by helping ourselves because as people are living longer, healthier lives you have more people taking out and as they have fewer children ( since we have fewer farms and more birth control options now there are fewer people paying into a system that was really designed to help people the last one to say five years and not the last ten 20 or 30 years.
 
Upvote 0

dogs4thewin

dog lover
Christian Forums Staff
Hands-on Trainee
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2012
30,374
5,614
32
Georgia U.S. State
✟896,872.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Last year, Social Security made a profit of $44 billion, because it paid less in benefits than it collected in payroll tax. It has a total of $3 trillion in profits saved up in the bank.

It currently is fully funded, in that retiree benefits are equal to contributions plus interest.

Long-term, that won't last, because people are living longer, but a fairly modest cut to benefits and/or payroll tax increase will balance the books again.
Another option may be to only allow certain people to collect. When I say that, I mean that people who are worth millions of dollars or are still maintaining say a six figure income by investments one could argue do not really need the money. The bar would be set high though net worth and/or income wise. It would not be like 50k or anything.
 
Upvote 0

dogs4thewin

dog lover
Christian Forums Staff
Hands-on Trainee
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2012
30,374
5,614
32
Georgia U.S. State
✟896,872.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
It is mathematically unfair, and unsustainable ... no matter how we might feel about it, unfortunately.
so people should not have insurance then?
 
Upvote 0

dogs4thewin

dog lover
Christian Forums Staff
Hands-on Trainee
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2012
30,374
5,614
32
Georgia U.S. State
✟896,872.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Jesus IS the Word.

He says the poor we will always have with us.

I've said nothing about those who are unable to work, unless they are here illegally.

Social security was created to cover you in that final year or two of life... when created man retired about one year before the average man died.

Yes I know of those using TIN numbers to pay taxes, God bless them. But they do so to obey the laws and with hope of receiving back once citizens. They are not the ones coming here only for a free handout without excuse.


Proverbs 18:9-10 Whoever is lazy regarding his work is also a brother to the master of destruction. The name of the Lord is a strong tower; a righteous person rushes to it and is lifted up above the danger.

Proverbs 10:3-5 The Lord won’t cause the righteous to hunger, but he will reject what the wicked crave. Idle hands bring poverty, but hard-working hands lead to wealth. Whoever harvests during summer acts wisely, but the son who sleeps during harvest is disgraceful.

Proverbs 21:25 The craving of a sluggard will be the death of him, because his hands refuse to work.

Deuteronomy 5:13 Six days you shall labor and do all your work.

Genesis 2:15 The Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it.
Also, Jesus said we will always have the poor among us that is not the same as saying the SAME poor.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

dogs4thewin

dog lover
Christian Forums Staff
Hands-on Trainee
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2012
30,374
5,614
32
Georgia U.S. State
✟896,872.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Insurance - where people voluntarily pay in under the hopes they shouldn't have to use it - is not the same as SS/MC, where people are required to pay in and expect to use it.
Actually, people have the option of not using it. Just because you reach a certain age does not force you to collect social security and in fact as long as one is working for pay (assuming that it is not "under the table" they are still paying in and so if they reach that age whether they choose to take out or not they are still putting in they can be 90 years old, but if they are still earning a pay check they are still paying in even if they opt not to collect one red cent.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
10,661
5,770
Montreal, Quebec
✟251,078.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
There is a difference in personally choosing to help people and the government making that decision by force.
A common, albeit misleading argument. You vote - and freely I might add - to be taxed to support the public good.
 
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟186,371.00
Marital Status
Private
Actually, people have the option of not using it. Just because you reach a certain age does not force you to collect social security and in fact as long as one is working for pay (assuming that it is not "under the table" they are still paying in and so if they reach that age whether they choose to take out or not they are still putting in they can be 90 years old, but if they are still earning a pay check they are still paying in even if they opt not to collect one red cent.
True, but I imagine most people expect to collect SS if they can ... whereas most people don't want the event to happen which would require them to collect insurance money.
 
Upvote 0

dogs4thewin

dog lover
Christian Forums Staff
Hands-on Trainee
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2012
30,374
5,614
32
Georgia U.S. State
✟896,872.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
A common, albeit misleading argument. You vote - and freely I might add - to be taxed to support the public good.
yes, but the public good, as opposed to giving to people that you feel deserve it and truly need it as opposed to trusting the government to make those calls.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums