MJ Only How the Bible is divided in Judaism

CherubRam said:

I'm sorry, but that does not count as a fact. Try again.

Click to expand...

If you don't understand that what I said was a fact, then I encourage you to read, read, read some more mainstream scholarship on the Lord's Day.

CherubRam said:

And why not?

Click to expand...

The day of the Lord is an apocolyptic expression.
The Lord's Day is a Greek expression used by the Early Church to refer to the Eighth Day, which they denoted as the day the Messiah arose, and on which they met to break bread. See the writings of the Apostolic Fathers.

CherubRam said:

Do you have any facts to back that up?

Click to expand...

Yes, there are verses to back up that Luke was a Gentile.

In Colossians 4:10-11 Paul names his fellow workers with him who are ‘of the circumcision' aka Jews. He lists Aristarchus (a Jew from Thessalonica), Mark (Jewish name John/Yochanan), Barnabas and Justus. In verse 14, he states that Luke and Demas send thier greetings, which obviously implies that Luke and Demas are there with him. Yet he doesn't list them with the circumcized (Jews).

CherubRam said:

When John was in the spirit the last days were revealed to him on the Lord's Day; that is "the day of the Lord."

Click to expand...

No, John is simply stating which day of the week he had his vision on. He did not have his vision in the last days.

Dave-W said:

Only in English.

Click to expand...

contextually.

CherubRam said:

So much for logic!

Click to expand...

I think you must have meant "So much logic!" It requires sound logic to read things in context.

Here is the context for Lord's day, and it definitely isnt scary end of days stuff:
" But every Lord’s day do ye gather yourselves together, and break bread, and give thanksgiving after having confessed your transgressions, that your sacrifice may be pure."
(Didache Chapter XIV.11)

Open Heart said:

I think you must have meant "So much logic!" It requires sound logic to read things in context.

Here is the context for Lord's day, and it definitely isnt scary end of days stuff:
" But every Lord’s day do ye gather yourselves together, and break bread, and give thanksgiving after having confessed your transgressions, that your sacrifice may be pure."
(Didache Chapter XIV.11)

Click to expand...

That is very Catholic of you. Have a nice day.

Open Heart said:

If you don't understand that what I said was a fact, then I encourage you to read, read, read some more mainstream scholarship on the Lord's Day.

Click to expand...

Open Heart said:

I think you must have meant "So much logic!" It requires sound logic to read things in context.

Here is the context for Lord's day, and it definitely isnt scary end of days stuff:
" But every Lord’s day do ye gather yourselves together, and break bread, and give thanksgiving after having confessed your transgressions, that your sacrifice may be pure."
(Didache Chapter XIV.11)

Click to expand...

Nothing in that statement implies anything like you are trying to make it, but just because it comes from a certain persuasion, it is construed to be a different 'lord's" day than our Lord's.

It is somewhat frustrating. It would be much easier if the Tanakh was organized like most books are... in chronological order. The way its organized now, you are skipping all over history and unless you have a strong understanding of the timeline of the prophets and the writings it can add to confusion. *shrugs*