Does God have free will?

Does God have free will?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

We don't have any words for things that don't change and die becasue of time.
Yes we do.
Things that don't change = changeless or unchanging.
Things that don't die = immortal

My mistake. Thanks for the correction.


1 Timothy 1:17 Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God,
be honor and glory for ever and ever. Amen. ...

Romans 1:23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like
a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles. ...

1 Timothy 6:16 who alone is immortal and who lives in unapproachable light, whom no one has
seen or can see. To him be honor and might forever. Amen. ...

Habakkuk 1:12 LORD, are you not from everlasting? My God, my Holy LORD, you have been active from ancient times; my sovereign God, you are immortal.


.
 
Upvote 0

YouAreAwesome

☝✌
Oct 17, 2016
2,181
968
Lismore, Australia
✟94,543.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Time causes degradation and decay

Proof?

God is there, in both places, for our beginning and our end, and doesn't change in the middle.

Agree that He was there in the beginning and will be there in the end. His character is unchanging throughout the journey in between.

The scripture writers must have gotten their writings
from some source that we do, or do not have access to?

We have access to God. We don't have direct access to the history. Your point?
 
Upvote 0

YouAreAwesome

☝✌
Oct 17, 2016
2,181
968
Lismore, Australia
✟94,543.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
My mistake. Thanks for the correction.


1 Timothy 1:17 Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God,
be honor and glory for ever and ever. Amen. ...

Romans 1:23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like
a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles. ...

1 Timothy 6:16 who alone is immortal and who lives in unapproachable light, whom no one has
seen or can see. To him be honor and might forever. Amen. ...

Habakkuk 1:12 LORD, are you not from everlasting? My God, my Holy LORD, you have been active from ancient times; my sovereign God, you are immortal.


.

Why did you post these verses?
 
Upvote 0

Everybodyknows

The good guys lost
Dec 19, 2016
796
763
Australia
✟45,191.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How can anyone bequeath to someone else, something they do not possess?
How did God bequeath to us physical material bodies when he himself is immaterial?

Perhaps free will is not some magically bestowed special ability, but rather arises out of our limitations by virtue of the things that God has not bequeathed to us. Namely our inability to know the future and our existence bound in time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: YouAreAwesome
Upvote 0

Everybodyknows

The good guys lost
Dec 19, 2016
796
763
Australia
✟45,191.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
SkyWriting said:
Job 36:26
"Behold, God is exalted, and we do not know Him; The number of His years is unsearchable

So......unsearchable then.
Look, I'm not opposed to either view of God being in time or outside of time, so we could go back and forth with scriptures all day. I'm just maintaining the view that scripture isn't 100% clear on the issue. If you hold the timeless view of God, as most seem to, I'm fine with that. Let's talk about how it relates to free will.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: YouAreAwesome
Upvote 0

Everybodyknows

The good guys lost
Dec 19, 2016
796
763
Australia
✟45,191.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't consider Aquinas a very good source about such questions. He considers Aristotle (among others) as an authority.

Anyway, the question of free will makes no sense for God.

There are aspects of our soul which clearly don't have free will, for example, the subconscious or unconscious. Only when conscious do we have free will, and only then regarding things involving the will.

Materialist scientists want to deny free will because, I think, they might have to consider the existence of something outside of the physical material universe.
What in particular (relating to this thread) do you find wrong with Aristotle?
 
Upvote 0

Everybodyknows

The good guys lost
Dec 19, 2016
796
763
Australia
✟45,191.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Thank you for correcting me. If you think God has
-No Control
-Limited Control or
-Full Control
you may offer your support for your decision.

I stand behind "Full control of the instantaneous position of every electron in the Cosmos."

17 He is before all things,
and in Him all things hold together.


Psalm 135:6
Whatever the LORD pleases, He does, In heaven and in earth, in the seas and in all deeps.

Psalm 115:3
But our God is in the heavens; He does whatever He pleases.

Isaiah 46:10
Declaring the end from the beginning, And from ancient times things which have not been done, Saying, 'My purpose will be established, And I will accomplish all My good pleasure';

Daniel 4:35
"All the inhabitants of the earth are accounted as nothing, But He does according to His will in the host of heaven And among the inhabitants of earth; And no one can ward off His hand Or say to Him, 'What have You done?'

Luke 1:37
Job 42:2
Matthew 19:26
Ephesians 3:20
1 Samuel 2:10
2 Chronicles 20:6
Job 9:12
Interesting question. It's going a little of topic but I'll answer anyway.

I have great difficulty with your view of God constantly controlling every particle in the universe at every moment in time, as this leads to some rather strange conclusions. Our thoughts arise from electrical impulses (electrons) between neurons in our brain. If God was continually controlling every electron then the implication is that God is controlling every single thought we ever have. This would totally negate human free will and make our existence rather pointless.

So where the Bible says 'in him all things hold together', I view it as God upholding the laws of nature that govern the universe rather than him controlling each interaction governed by those laws. Of course God can control any and every particle at any time he wishes to serve his purpose. For example, he does so when he parts the red sea, but has no need to control every atom in the breeze blowing in my garden as the laws of nature do the job sufficiently without intervention.

So I guess in essence I see no necessary limitation to his power, he can do as he wills and non can stop him. But I also see him as a minimalist when it comes to intervening, meaning he leaves the laws of nature doing their job for the most part, only intervening in the most economical way to achieve his will.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: YouAreAwesome
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
But I also see him as a minimalist when it comes to intervening, meaning he leaves the laws of nature doing their job for the most part, only intervening in the most economical way to achieve his will.

This would suggest that He made the earth, and the stars are there so we can see better at night. The nearly infinite Cosmos doesn't seem like the most economical way to create humans.

I'm going to take Jesus's word that we are his children and the plants and animals are our food and not God's main goal. Otherwise eating people would be fine.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Look, I'm not opposed to either view of God being in time or outside of time, so we could go back and forth with scriptures all day. I'm just maintaining the view that scripture isn't 100% clear on the issue. If you hold the timeless view of God, as most seem to, I'm fine with that. Let's talk about how it relates to free will.

The wages of Sin is Death. So Adam deserved immediate death. Instead, God gave the gift of "time" which slowly causes degradation and death. Inside this gift, which delays our immediate death, is the "free will" to focus on the intent of God rather than on accumulating power and control over creation. We have the "free will" to change our course from permanent death, to living with God instead. Should we choose that, we get to continue. According to scripture, our destiny is known to God already. So that's a continuous conundrum that can't be explained.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So where the Bible says 'in him all things hold together', I view it as God upholding the laws of nature that govern the universe rather than him controlling each interaction governed by those laws. Of course God can control any and every particle at any time he wishes to serve his purpose. For example, he does so when he parts the red sea, but has no need to control every atom in the breeze blowing in my garden as the laws of nature do the job sufficiently without intervention.

The scriptures say that the laws of nature are God's will.
So there's that.

Matthew 21:19
Mark 4:39
Job 38:11
Psalm 33:7
Psalm 104:9
Psalm 65:7
Psalm 89:9
Psalm 107:29
He caused the storm to be still, So that the waves of the sea were hushed.
Matthew 8:26
Matthew 14:32
Psalm 148:8
Fire and hail, snow and clouds; Stormy wind, fulfilling His word;
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Everybodyknows

The good guys lost
Dec 19, 2016
796
763
Australia
✟45,191.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The wages of Sin is Death. So Adam deserved immediate death. Instead, God gave the gift of "time" which slowly causes degradation and death. Inside this gift, which delays our immediate death, is the "free will" to focus on the intent of God rather than on accumulating power and control over creation. We have the "free will" to change our course from permanent death, to living with God instead. Should we choose that, we get to continue. According to scripture, our destiny is known to God already. So that's a continuous conundrum that can't be explained.
There was time before the fall, no? So would Adam still be subject to degradation and death had he made better choices?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Tayla

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 30, 2017
1,694
801
USA
✟147,315.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
What in particular (relating to this thread) do you find wrong with Aristotle?
Things wrong with Aristotle...
  1. Causation: Perhaps the big bang had no preceding cause. Perhaps the randomness of quantum mechanics and the weak force don't either.
  2. Mind/intellect: He talks about these without mentioning what they are. Are they aspects of matter? In a distinct spiritual realm apart from the physical material realm (this is my view). Are they merely brain structure and function?
  3. Forms: A chair (for example) has form and matter. If the form is not the matter, what is it? Similar question as for mind.
 
Upvote 0

YouAreAwesome

☝✌
Oct 17, 2016
2,181
968
Lismore, Australia
✟94,543.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'm sorry but this makes no sense to me. Please explain how time can be the cause of anything? What does time itself, cause?

That's a good point.
The advancement of time causes degradation and decay.
As the amount of time passed goes toward zero, so does decay.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Causation: Perhaps the big bang had no preceding cause. Perhaps the randomness of quantum mechanics and the weak force don't either.
The same goes for murder and the entire rest of the Cosmos then.
If the big bang has no cause, then the result of the big bang would
need no reason to continue to exist either. Nor would causation be
required for any results that followed.
Unless you have a reason why "no causation" would suddenly stop?
(Ill give you time to answer in the hope that you are still there.)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Everybodyknows

The good guys lost
Dec 19, 2016
796
763
Australia
✟45,191.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This would suggest that He made the earth, and the stars are there so we can see better at night. The nearly infinite Cosmos doesn't seem like the most economical way to create humans.

I'm going to take Jesus's word that we are his children and the plants and animals are our food and not God's main goal. Otherwise eating people would be fine.
:scratch:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: YouAreAwesome
Upvote 0