You should try and actually read someone's post before responding to it.
I never said that. I said, as with the story promoted by Dayna Morales, this story could very well be fabricated and for the same reasons. It makes the US military look bad, it can be used to promote an agenda, it can be used another attempt to discredit white Conservative/Republicans and President Trump.
I read the New York Times article and no where does it even mention whether the incident is being investigated to determine who committed the act, and why. I would think those would be two quite important questions, wouldn't you, means and intent?
But no, in today's age the facts of a case are not relevant. The charge alone is sufficient to not only to prompt but demand action. The default assumption, particularly since November 4th of last year, to any claim of racism is to accept the validity of the claim and grovel before the altar of self-righteous indignation. Because of course no one would
ever fabricate any
story designed to discredit their opposition. The lunatic left hates the US military, that has been obvious for decades.
It would be nice to know if anyone is checking the facts. You know, conducting an actual investigation as opposed to knee-jerk pandering.
Here you have me. No, I don't think he bothered to investigate the incident in any manner. Based on his words as published I believe he did exactly what political generals do, ran right out to deploy weapons-grade CYA in reaction to the accusation.
After reading not only the OP article, but the associated articles linked within, no, I don't. What are you making, an appeal to authority? The guy is a general therefore he can't be questioned?
From the OP article, quote:
"He then explicitly linked the discovery of the slurs to events like the demonstrations in Charlottesville, Va., where white supremacists marched with torches in August, and Ferguson, Mo., where the fatal shooting of a black teenager by a police officer in 2014 set off protests across the country. He said that these events formed a backdrop that had to be addressed, and that to think otherwise would be “tone deaf.”
There are two types of general officer in the United States military, warriors and political hacks. These comments clearly tell me the head of the Air Force Academy is a political hack. He is paying homage to two of the liberal/progressive left's most cherished and deified moments, the lie of Ferguson and the ascendance of Antifa as the new violent arm of the Democrat party. And he refers to both in the mandated manner, with complete disregard for the truth.
How very third-grade of you.