Hoghead1 said: ↑
Just what is your definition of the scientific method, Justalookout? Also, I believe that credentials make the man. If you are going take off against science, then you better have some, big, big credentials and some big,big evidence. So just what are your credentials?
Well, if you will honestly respond in turn;
I earned my U. Cal. doctorate in 1976. My first research fellowship was as an undergrad in nuclear geochemistry. So was my
second. My third research fellowship was in nuclear geochemistry in graduate school. Just to break the pattern, my fourth research fellowship was in anthropology as was my 1976 doctorate. My first industry job was as an analytical polymer chemist, and my first professorship was in medicine. One of the more popular seminars I led was on statistical analysis. I of course published in psychiatry. I also have publications in math models and topology (graph theory). I have also published in geochemistry and biology. Starting in 1982 I initiated a pattern of engaging students in active research projects. For example;
1982 "Clinical Implications of Some Graph Centrality Measures" Hurd, G. S, Bonney Jennings. Sun Belt Social Network Conference
1982 "Adjacency Matrix Density and Consensus," Hurd, G. S., Kathy Hammond. Sun Belt Social Network Conference
1982 "Functional Equivalence in Social Relations," G. S. Hurd, M. Migalski. American Anthropological Association, Washington D.C. November
After 1988 my interest turned to (mostly) archaeology. I was a director of a natural history foundation and museum. In that role I wrote science curriculum for K-12 schools in California. After 1995, I engaged dozens of undergraduate students in new research studies which began their academic careers. (References on request).
You are merely an anonymous internet warrior. You might as well pretend you are the Galactic
King Kiss-my-fanny.
