American Businesses Penalized for Refusing Service to Gay People

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tree of Life

Hide The Pain
Feb 15, 2013
8,824
6,251
✟48,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Who determines if a law is unjust?
God.
Should a citizen be allowed to break a law they consider unjust?
Not only are they allowed to break it. In many cases they are commanded by God to break it.

There are clear and obvious examples in history in which a law was unjust. The Civil Rights era of the 50s and 60s are a prime example. Thousands of brave men and women both White and Black defied those laws. They were beaten, imprisoned and in some cases killed for a righteous cause. Freedom and Liberty.

Agreed.

Christians opposed to gay marriage and discrimination against gays are in opposition to the spirit of this country and are on the wrong side of history. Similarly, anti-gay Christians (not all Christians are anti-gay) are cherry picking this one particular sin and the hypocrisy is obvious to anyone with half a brain. On this issue, Anti-gay Christians not only lack legitimacy, but they lack a logical consistency. They also apparently lack the ability to see just how ridiculous they look to everyone else. They are on the wrong side of history on this issue and every time they try to play the victim card on this issue, they just end up looking like oppressive delusional bullies...

I disagree with your polemical.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,796
✟247,431.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
God's word.

God's word.

God.
God's word.

God's word.

God.

What did you mean by this then:

"If you're referring to US Law, Christians (and all others) are not free to break it. They will incur the curse of the law if they do so."

You appear to contradict yourself again. You stated you understand that God's law does not define US law, but then when asked how should laws be determined to be; unjust and or abolished, you refer back to God's word. This is what is commonly known as; a circular argument.

So, who decides what "God's law" is????
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,796
✟247,431.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
God.

Not only are they allowed to break it. In many cases they are commanded by God to break it.



Agreed.



I disagree with your polemical.

You are full of contradictions today.

You say above, Christians are allowed to break the law and in many cases, "commanded" to break it. Yet, just a few posts ago, you said this:

"If you're referring to US Law, Christians (and all others) are not free to break it. They will incur the curse of the law if they do so."
 
Upvote 0

dgiharris

Old Crusty Vet
Jan 9, 2013
5,439
5,222
✟131,531.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
...Not only are they allowed to break it. In many cases they are commanded by God to break it..

Could you please elaborate on the specifics of how/when God commands someone to break a law?

Is this command communicated via burning bush, cell phone, or stone tablet?

Or, is this just an excuse used by a bigot to engage in discriminatory practices contrary to the law and then run under God's skirt for shelter citing "God told me to do it!"

Can't you see that hatred and discrimination is just wrong. It is. I've peppered this cite with my views on this matter and I will do so again.

How about we just treat all homosexuals just as we treat others from other religions. We can be polite and respectful and "love thy enemy" and then when we all die and find ourselves at Judgement Day we can let God sort it all out. Why don't we just do that?

I disagree with your polemical.

Color me surprised :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedPonyDriver
Upvote 0

Tree of Life

Hide The Pain
Feb 15, 2013
8,824
6,251
✟48,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
What did you mean by this then:

"If you're referring to US Law, Christians (and all others) are not free to break it. They will incur the curse of the law if they do so."

You appear to contradict yourself again. You stated you understand that God's law does not define US law, but then when asked how should laws be determined to be; unjust and or abolished, you refer back to God's word. This is what is commonly known as; a circular argument.

Again, "free" implies no consequence. There are, of course, consequences for breaking US Law. Therefore Christians are not entirely "free" to break it. They are, however, justified by God to break laws that are unjust.

So, who decides what "God's law" is????

God.
 
Upvote 0

Tree of Life

Hide The Pain
Feb 15, 2013
8,824
6,251
✟48,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
You are full of contradictions today.

You say above, Christians are allowed to break the law and in many cases, "commanded" to break it. Yet, just a few posts ago, you said this:

"If you're referring to US Law, Christians (and all others) are not free to break it. They will incur the curse of the law if they do so."

Commanded to break it but not free to break it. If they break it they will incur consequences from the US government. Not, however, from God though (assuming the laws are unjust).
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,796
✟247,431.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Again, "free" implies no consequence. There are, of course, consequences for breaking US Law. Therefore Christians are not entirely "free" to break it. They are, however, justified by God to break laws that are unjust.



God.

God decides what his law is, ok.

How does God communicate his law to people?
 
Upvote 0

Tree of Life

Hide The Pain
Feb 15, 2013
8,824
6,251
✟48,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Could you please elaborate on the specifics of how/when God commands someone to break a law?

Peter, James, and John were commanded by the temple authorities to no longer speak in the name of Jesus.

Is this command communicated via burning bush, cell phone, or stone tablet?

Scripture.

Can't you see that hatred and discrimination is just wrong. It is. I've peppered this cite with my views on this matter and I will do so again.

Hatred is not always wrong. It depends on what you hate. God hates divorce, it is said.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

dgiharris

Old Crusty Vet
Jan 9, 2013
5,439
5,222
✟131,531.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Who has the final say on how this scripture is interpreted?

And there's the rub...

My interpretation is to simply "Love thy enemy" and treat them with basic respect that I would treat any other human being and then come Judgment Day God can deal with them.

However, there are some Christians who feel that they need to hate and discriminate against gays while here on Earth as I guess they can't be bothered to wait till Judgment day. They would rather pass judgment all on their own here on Earth. Not to mention they reserve this special treatment "just" for gays. Not the other sins, not the other sinners, not even those who worship false gods and actively recruit others to worship false gods. No, just gays...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Strathos
Upvote 0

Hank

has the Right to be wrong
May 28, 2002
1,026
51
Toronto
✟16,926.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I think it's important to get the full story. Here is another perspective on this issue:

http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovemen...ng_you_heard_on_the_sweet_cakes_case_is_false

Oregon has a law that you cannot discriminate based on sexual orientation, and this couple's business practices broke that law. It's more simple, and less shocking and terrifying than some news outlets have made it out to be.

There was definitely a more peaceful, more loving, and equally righteous way out of this for this couple. They aren't in this situation just because they are Christians with Christian beliefs. They were also un-neighborly to their potential customers and disregarded state authority.
Thanks for the link. I heard about this story, but never fully understood both sides. I think I do now.

As for thoughts:
Yes. I am in construction. I was asked to design (engineer the building services) a mosque. People said, don't do it, because of this and this and this and you are a Christian (I was then). I (live by business is business) gave them a fair tender, they accepted and later gave me a horde of non-mosque projects. We are not friends, spiritually we are from different planets, but we (could) can do business together.
OK, I don't know how to bake a cake, but if I am in the cake baking business, I am in the cake baking business and not in the preaching business.
 
Upvote 0

Armoured

So is America great again yet?
Site Supporter
Aug 31, 2013
34,358
14,061
✟234,967.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
If you're referring to US Law, Christians (and all others) are not free to break it. They will incur the curse of the law if they do so.
They are free to break the law. They are not free from the consequences of that law. As the OP bakers are discovering, and now complaining about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ada Lovelace
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,851
25,787
LA
✟555,831.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Thanks for the link. I heard about this story, but never fully understood both sides. I think I do now.

As for thoughts:
Yes. I am in construction. I was asked to design (engineer the building services) a mosque. People said, don't do it, because of this and this and this and you are a Christian (I was then). I (live by business is business) gave them a fair tender, they accepted and later gave me a horde of non-mosque projects. We are not friends, spiritually we are from different planets, but we (could) can do business together.
OK, I don't know how to bake a cake, but if I am in the cake baking business, I am in the cake baking business and not in the preaching business.

This really deserves a bump! Well said. :oldthumbsup:
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,301
✟175,292.00
Faith
Seeker
Again, "free" implies no consequence. There are, of course, consequences for breaking US Law. Therefore Christians are not entirely "free" to break it. They are, however, justified by God to break laws that are unjust.
Now, the judicial system doesn´t have the time to wait until a person will have proven that the god of their beliefs exists and shares their idea what is just and unjust.
Thus, if breaking the law for religious reasons will get them exactly between the rock and the hard place these people find themselves in.
After all, the 9/11 guys believed to be on divine mission, as well.
Not sure how you think we should handle these issues if not in the way we do it now: not accepting religious convictions for an excuse.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,733
57
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟119,206.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
Thoughts?

I don't think that there should be a legal penalty for following your conscience, especially in a case like this. The bakery should have been legally free to reject the request, especially considering that it's easy enough to go to another bakery, or even to bake one's own wedding cake.

However, customers are also free to take their business elsewhere if they don't like what that particular bakery is doing. Boycotting is a reasonable response.

(Note: If the company in question is responsible for necessities of life, such as electricity, I can see the government stepping in and saying that they can't simply deny that service on anything other than financial grounds.)


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0

The_Gaurdian87

Active Member
Jun 9, 2015
111
98
36
Virginia
✟24,489.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Regardless of the story, I think Christian churches and business should have the right to refuse service if it goes against the religious beliefs. I am not hateful to gays, but the society we live in now is pulling away from God. You simply can't say you believe in biblical marriages publicly without backlash and people labeling you as a bigot. Further more, it's sad some churches and Christians now accept homosexuality as natural and normal.
 
Upvote 0

Armoured

So is America great again yet?
Site Supporter
Aug 31, 2013
34,358
14,061
✟234,967.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Regardless of the story, I think Christian churches and business should have the right to refuse service if it goes against the religious beliefs. I am not hateful to gays, but the society we live in now is pulling away from God. You simply can't say you believe in biblical marriages publicly without backlash and people labeling you as a bigot.
Sure you can. I believe in Biblical marriages. No one's calling me a bigot, but I said it publicly.
Further more, it's sad some churches and Christians now accept homosexuality as natural and normal.
Why's it sad? If the conscience of the decision makers of those churches so convicts them, what would you rather they do?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I listened yesterday to the July 4 message from a UMJC congregation that said they will no longer perform marriages for anyone. They will have a "worship service" to celebrate a couple coming together but will sign no paperwork and will not rent the facilities to anyone. (you have to do that at the court house now) Members in good standing can use the facilities for a donation.

That is reasonable I suppose. They are doing it to try to avoid a lawsuit.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.