That doesn't make sense, though, because it is talking about fruitless branches, not branches with bad fruit. It is also saying the whole branch will be removed from Christ.I'm not responding to #77 but I am responding to statements about John 15. The branches are truly in the vine connected to Jesus, truly removed by God and truly put in the fire. The question is, is this fire hellfire? I would emphatically answer no. Jesus is telling His disciples of 3-4 years that they can be in danger of losing their life should they stop applying the truth they've learned from Jesus. They can be in danger of getting their works burned up at the judgment seat of Christ. They can be in danger of not being fruitful. All these would lead to a fiery end, this is a destructive end, but it is not hell.
True believers can fall away from being fruitful, they can die physically, they can have a dead faith (James 2), they can have their works burned at the judgment seat, they can come under the consuming judgmental fire of God in their lives, tempering them to get the dross out of their lives, but they are not in danger of losing their salvation-justification, "yet he himself shall be saved" 1 Cor 3:15
Sure, it's no longer in Christ. There are many Christians not bearing fruit, not abiding in Christ. And the branch that doesn't bear much fruit is pruned to bear great fruit.
If anyone does not abide in Christ, he is thrown away. Abiding in Christ is not the same as believing in Christ. This is written to disciples who had been believing and abiding and following. They could stop doing all three, and Christ warns them not to do that. The consequences would be uselessness and punishment. What we're arguing about is whether or not this is temporary or permanent punishment. I think everything points to temporary punishment, even physical death is just a temporary punishment. Eternal punishment is negated by John 10.
But clearly even the context is against this, v. 7 if you abide in me ... ask whatever you wish and it will be done for you. Not all believers are abiding in Christ, not all believers are in fellowship with Christ and are fruitful and not all believers are getting what they wish to make them more fruitful. Clearly these are "this life" statements and circumstances. A Christian can waste his life right here and now and dry up and be burned. This is not future hell, this is present hell, present punishment.
You can choose to disagree, but then you are going against other clear statements in the Bible like, "No man can pluck them out of the Father's hand."
What is the question asked after Paul made his clear presentation of justification?
Romans 6:1 "Shall we continue to sin that grace may abound?"
May it never be, of course we can continue in sin and what will happen is that grace will abound.
This is not dangerous doctrine, it's common sense. You have someone you love, Joey Sculley. I'm assuming he's your son and forgive me for being so personal. But he's your son no matter what he does. If he fails to please you, if he does everything possible to try to deny being your son, he can't get away, he's still your son. Your love is unconditional based on what he may or may not do, it just is.
The same with salvation from God. We're born into His family. This isn't something that can be undone, no matter what we do.
Amen, and again forgive me for using something so personal to you.
Are you aware of Heb 12? Those of God's children who make such choices will not "get away" with it. Is that what really concerns you? That some will "get away" with the things that you might want to do but don't, for fear that you'll lose your salvation? I sense that from the ridiculous and extreme example you gave.I am not saying anyone is plucked out. I'm saying God lets them go. There is a difference.
The reason behind this is that if a person can be fruitless after his conversion, then he literally has no purpose for which he must do anything. It is completely logical to say the following:
After conversion, you cannot lose salvation, therefore now that I have converted, I can go to my house and have sex with every prostitute in my city and curse the name of God.
This is why it is dangerous
I agree that eternal life a process of intimate knowledge from John 17. However, John 6:47 says "he who believes has eternal life" this must mean that eternal life is also positional, in this case.
You are reacting to the grace of God which has the ability to cover sins past, present and future. Belief truly is a ticket to heaven. But continued belief is intimate knowledge of God, processional eternal life and reward in heaven.
I recognize that we are going to disagree, you are adding an invalid understanding of repentance to belief. Repentance is a turning away from dead works to God, this occurs before belief (Cornelius in Acts 10), at belief (many examples in Scripture), and after belief, again, many Scriptural examples. In fact repentance is the lifeblood of the Christian walk, the misappropriated verse in 2 Peter for "all to come to repentance" is actually "the Lord is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish." Who is the "you?" It's believers. We should be continually repenting and turning to God.
I agree salvation is synergistic, but if we let go of God He cannot let go of us, this is the nature of the infinite/finite relationship of salvation.
Are you aware of Heb 12? Those of God's children who make such choices will not "get away" with it. Is that what really concerns you? That some will "get away" with the things that you might want to do but don't, for fear that you'll lose your salvation? I sense that from the ridiculous and extreme example you gave.
God's Word promises eternal life for those who believe in Christ. And God's Word promises "scourging" (Heb 12) for those children who are disobedient.
Without doubt, Solomon was a believer, yet he ended poorly. 1 Kings 11:1-13 records when he "grew old". Very poorly.
So you just discount any significance of the word "scourge" in Heb 12? It means to "skin alive with a whip". If that is getting away with anything, I'll eat my hat. Why don't you think God is capable of making the life on earth of any of His children miserable for their disobedience?If they get into heaven, then they get away with it.
I have never said there is no eternal punishment. All who have not believed in Christ will experience eternal punishment. So please get that straight.If there is no eternal punishment, then what we end up with is the following statement:
Hitler, as a child, confessed and believed on Christ and truly meant it.
Later in life, something happened and Hitler left Christ.
Throughout his life, Hitler killed Jews, Frenchmen, Polish people, and all others who got in his way on his path of world domination.
Hitler ended his own life after he lost the war.
According to what you say, because kid-Hitler truly meant what he said as a child, adult Hitler died and went to heaven alongside Mother Teresa.
So you just discount any significance of the word "scourge" in Heb 12? It means to "skin alive with a whip". If that is getting away with anything, I'll eat my hat. Why don't you think God is capable of making the life on earth of any of His children miserable for their disobedience?
Haven't you read 1 Cor 11:30? Or 1 Cor 10? What in the world did Paul mean by "examples" if their lives aren't applicable to ours today? If they were all unbelievers, there would be NO example for us.
There is no eternal punishment for those who have made a promise that they very clearly broke and had no remorse for breaking.I have never said there is no eternal punishment. All who have not believed in Christ will experience eternal punishment. So please get that straight.
If Hitler did actually believe on Christ (as a child is irrelevant), then God has obligated Himself to save those who believe. Period.
Regardless of what he did as an adult, God always keeps His promises, though it seens you don't actually believe that. Wow.
Have you read the life of Solomon? 1 Kings 11:1-13 sums up his life. The kingdom was taken away from his son, because of how he ended; which was quite poorly. The text is clear enough.
I suppose you'd argue that Solomon ended up in hell.
Very short sighted of you. Scripture is FULL of God's discipline for sinning believers. I gave you examples.The punishment for sin is eternal death.
So what?The punishment for constant habitual sin for a Christian is temporal inconvenience in comparison to heaven.
Who made a promise? The Bible is clear: God makes the promise. Please re-think your view so that it aligns with Scripture.There is no eternal punishment for those who have made a promise that they very clearly broke and had no remorse for breaking.
The difference with Solomon is that he did repent, whereas I'm talking of people who did not repent.Oh yeah? Where do you read that?
Do you believe that Hilter ever believed in Christ? Please cite your source.Hitler, however, did NOT repent. He continued all the way through to his own suicide. Hitler would not be in heaven.
God promises eternal life to those who believe. "Eternal" is as secure as it can be.God is just, and eternal security is about as just, IMHO, as Vladimir Putin.
His letter wasn't even about salvation. It was about practical Christian living.James painted a very different view of salvation.
Well, thank you for your heretical opinion. The Bible clearly says otherwise. Are you a Catholic? That's their view.Plain belief is NOT enough to save.
Please read with more care. No, they don't. All James said about demons is that believe that God is One, or monotheism. What does that have to do with saving faith? Nothing. Which is the point; James wasn't speaking about saving faith either.Even the demons have plain belief.
btw, what the demons believe, they believe because of experience, not because of faith. Do you see the difference or not?
Very short sighted of you. Scripture is FULL of God's discipline for sinning believers. I gave you examples.
So, instead, you would see Hitler in heaven next to Paul because he made a promise as a kid?So what?
Who made a promise? The Bible is clear: God makes the promise. Please re-think your view so that it aligns with Scripture.
Oh yeah? Where do you read that?
Do you believe that Hilter ever believed in Christ? Please cite your source.
God promises eternal life to those who believe. "Eternal" is as secure as it can be.
His letter wasn't even about salvation. It was about practical Christian living.
Well, thank you for your heretical opinion. The Bible clearly says otherwise. Are you a Catholic? That's their view.
Please read with more care. No, they don't. All James said about demons is that believe that God is One, or monotheism. What does that have to do with saving faith? Nothing. Which is the point; James wasn't speaking about saving faith either.
btw, what the demons believe, they believe because of experience, not because of faith. Do you see the difference or not?
If God keeps His promise, what do you think? Maybe you think God doesn't have to keep His promises.So, instead, you would see Hitler in heaven next to Paul because he made a promise as a kid?
How 'bout that! It's called grace. Seems you have a problem with that.That is the opposite of justice.
Your paragraph only "halfway" makes sense. God promises eternal life for those who believe in Christ. Do you believe this?That does halfway align with Scripture. God made the promise on the cross. He did not remake that promise. Repentance is not a word or confession. It is an action and a work. There is absolutely no point to anything except the gospel message if they are not necessary for salvation. Not little point. No point.
How do you know that's what he wrote just before he died? 1 Kings 11:1-13 summarizes his life. There's no repentance in 1 Kings 11. Maybe you should read the passage before you pass judgment.Ecclesiastes, you know, his last book which is essentially the repentant words of an old sinner.
The problem is that the RCC adds works to gain salvation. Grace and works NEVER go together. It is faith ALONE in Christ ALONE by grace ALONE that saves. There is no evidence that Hitler ever believed in Christ as Savior. But even if he did, God made a promise and is obligated to keep it.He was raised in Germany as a Catholic. As I recall, Catholics confess the Creed, though they do add the filioque.
Scripture describes it in several ways, not just the one way you have fixated on.He promises eternal life, but it is obvious that they do not have it, unless you can claim to have a completely intimate knowledge of God. That is the very definition of eternal life. Therefore, you do not yet have it, by the Scripture's definition.
So what? We find the exact form in Acts 27:20,31 and the context is clearly physical deliverance from being drowned.He asks the question: Can faith save him?
It is the exact same form of save used for salvation in the rest of scripture. And it means exactly the same.
So what? Irrelevant. They KNOW that Jesus is the Christ, but that's not what James was noting. All he noted was that demons believe that God is One, which isn't the gospel. You are trying to mix apples and oranges.Demons have plain belief. They more than believe. They know that they know that they know exactly who Christ is, who God is, who the Spirit is, and how salvation works. And yet they do not have salvation.
Sure it is. They believe that 2:24 means that man is justified (saved) by faith plus works.That isn't the view of the Roman Catholics, who you just called heretics in a way which is contrary to the rules, but of the Apostle James.
I'll let Paul refute your view:He didn't ask "can faith save him?" It is very clear. That is the thesis, and the conclusion is NO. Faith alone does not justify, which is necessary to salvation.
And what point are you trying to make here?Belief is belief, whatever the reason.
If God keeps His promise, what do you think? Maybe you think God doesn't have to keep His promises.
How 'bout that! It's called grace. Seems you have a problem with that.
Your paragraph only "halfway" makes sense. God promises eternal life for those who believe in Christ. Do you believe this?
How do you know that's what he wrote just before he died? 1 Kings 11:1-13 summarizes his life. There's no repentance in 1 Kings 11. Maybe you should read the passage before you pass judgment.
The problem is that the RCC adds works to gain salvation. Grace and works NEVER go together. It is faith ALONE in Christ ALONE by grace ALONE that saves. There is no evidence that Hitler ever believed in Christ as Savior. But even if he did, God made a promise and is obligated to keep it.
Scripture describes it in several ways, not just the one way you have fixated on.
God's promise:
1 John 2:25
This is the promise which He Himself made to us: eternal life.
God's criteria:
John 6:40
For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life, and I Myself will raise him up on the last day.
So what? We find the exact form in Acts 27:20,31 and the context is clearly physical deliverance from being drowned.
In fact, James used 'sozo' 5 times; none of which refer to eternal salvation.
So what? Irrelevant. They KNOW that Jesus is the Christ, but that's not what James was noting. All he noted was that demons believe that God is One, which isn't the gospel. You are trying to mix apples and oranges.
Notice that Paul is constantly speaking of works OF THE LAW throughout his letters. James defines works as different.Sure it is. They believe that 2:24 means that man is justified (saved) by faith plus works.
I'll let Paul refute your view:
Romans 4:4
Now to the one who works, his wage is not credited as a favor, but as what is due.
Romans 4:5
But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness,
Ephesians 2:8
For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;
Ephesians 2:9
not as a result of works, so that no one may boast.
Apparently you disagree with Paul. I don't.
Was Thomas's belief not saving then?And what point are you trying to make here?
There are 2 ways people believe something. From trust, or from experience. Maybe you just don't understand the difference.
Jesus noted the difference as well:
John 20:27
Then He said to Thomas, Reach here with your finger, and see My hands; and reach here your hand and put it into My side; and do not be unbelieving, but believing.
John 20:28
Thomas answered and said to Him, My Lord and my God!
John 20:29
Jesus said to him, Because you have seen Me, have you believed? Blessed are they who did not see, and yet believed.
If they get into heaven, then they get away with it. If there is no eternal punishment, then what we end up with is the following statement:
Hitler, as a child, confessed and believed on Christ and truly meant it.
Later in life, something happened and Hitler left Christ.
Throughout his life, Hitler killed Jews, Frenchmen, Polish people, and all others who got in his way on his path of world domination.
Hitler ended his own life after he lost the war.
According to what you say, because kid-Hitler truly meant what he said as a child, adult Hitler died and went to heaven alongside Mother Teresa.