Are you trying to tell me that you know better than the people who are actually conducting and co-ordinating the search effort? Because that's...well, it's rather arrogant of you. IMHO.
No, that isn't my point. But, I also don't just blindly follow what people say because "they said it, and they have this degree or work in this field." They are still humans who are capable of being misled and lying. The people coordinating the search effort know as much as you do. The people coordinating the coordinators know more, and the gold trickles
uphill.
You can call me arrogant for not trusting what the people say on the mainstream media owned by one person (who has a lot to gain in all of this mess.) Do I care? Not at all; I have been called worse by people who know much less. It is unfortunate you believe that that box on or against your wall is a beacon of truth (when it comes to the news.) You are still responsible for whatever you have heard - be it right or wrong. Don't say no one warned you if/when something happens re: the plane being a weapon, or some other false flag. This really isn't that hard to see - it is barely conspiracy and much more of just them outright and blatantly being negligent.
And like I said, in that scenario, the families might never be told anything.
You are missing the point. Do not say anything if you don't know anything. If you have to tell the families something, say "we still don't know, but we are finding debris that may or
may not be linked to 370. Simple. I am sure the parents rather "not know" than
have their intelligence insulted by a leader that says it is beyond a reasonable doubt the plane crashed with no survivors. Where is the evidence to make such a claim? Politically, socially and psychologically sloppiness.
They think people are stupid and ignorant, at least lazy and apathetic. They know most people will just believe the cover story without question, and the ones that do will get taken care of by the
scoffers and people who challenge out of incredulity.
At this stage, it's unlikely.
Again with the conditionals. Likelihood matters not in evidence and truth of finding something and connecting dots and extrapolating data. You say unlikely, I may say likely. Guess what? For either one of us, there is
no evidence to vindicate you or me. So, your opinion of the likelihood of people surviving - without confirmed wreckage, bodies, identification, etc. - is nothing more than opinion.
Then it will be found intact somewhere. But it's been nearly a month with no sign of the 'plane. The likelihood of it being found in one piece is tiny.
You don't even know the geography of that area, and "who" is there, do you. You cant know, because if you did, you would know there are several military bases on Islands "not on the map" that the plane could have stopped at, and refueled. Again, you have no idea of the likelihood, and neither do I. I was making a point on how erroneous it is to talk about something in a positive qualifier when there has been no evidence presented.
This could be another "Lost" type of situation, especially when you consider T. Aviv, and how Charles Widmore
staged the crashing of flight 815 with bodies. Art imitates life.
Nobody is expecting anyone "to be good sheep". Where do you get that idea?
I read news outside of the States and the West. What the West doesn't tell, the other news agencies are reporting. And, I have had to sliver through media blackouts in those respective countries. If people were paying attention, there would be no reason why these people would be justified in dragging everyone on an emotional ride with inept evidences. Then, extrapolate chat room microcosms - where their is anonymity - and that lets me know nothing has changed in the Westerner since 2001. Still too scared to demand questions/see how far the rabbit hole goes, and still to programmed so much to believe whatever their leaders say.
If, as you say, the families are being lied to, then what's the truth? Where's the 'plane, where are the passengers, how can the people involved in the search for the 'plane have been so wrong in focusing their search efforts in the Indian Ocean, and where should they actually be looking?
We will find out the truth whenever they decide to pull off their next act. You keep asking where the plane is: it doesn't matter on the grand scheme of things (where the people are matters; they don't have to be at the same place as the plane.) Also, a replica was
bought on October 2013, then shipped to T. Aviv Novenber 2013. Why buy a replica exactly the same sans serial number?
The people involved in the search are low levels. If there is something more sinister, as to not leak information you send out drones to distract. Now, these searchers could be decorated officers, doctors/nurses, scientists, etc. So, they don't even know
why they would be searching such an area except it was a directive by respective countries that sent them. That is it.
I will say it again, they need to look at Israel. But, they won't because they cant, because something else is being planned. They almost blew their cover when they leaked the story about Chinese fighter jets escorting the plane. That was quickly retracted in the media.
