Jesus's Church - Where is it?

kenblaster5000

Regular Member
Feb 5, 2007
1,942
102
Las Vegas NV
✟10,240.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Martin Luther and so many others were filled with the Holy Spirit and knew that Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life. By faith, not by works, they were justified. In order to carry out their own faith they had to leave the Roman Catholic Church, which in my opinion is about as asleep as they come. Wake up, don't follow man and his doctrines, but Jesus Christ and with His power and authority, not by our might or our power, but by His Spirit. He calls us by name, and in obedience He chooses us.
 
Upvote 0

kenblaster5000

Regular Member
Feb 5, 2007
1,942
102
Las Vegas NV
✟10,240.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
The Church that Jesus founded is the Catholic Church. :thumbsup:

The church that Jesus Christ founded was done on the cross. He died for our sins. Those who pick up their cross are worthy, not those who defend the faithless church of Revelations. Those who indeed overcome by the blood of the Lamb, by their testimony of what Jesus Christ did for them, and they hate their own lives to the death. I do not see any masses said in our name after death. I believe some have found Jesus Christ in the Catholic Church, but as with me, I do not think I would want to associate with the rest, if they would bring me down into the mire that I am washed from, but if strong enough we may be able to pull others from the fire of dull, lifeless religion. Jesus Christ is the name above all names, and His bride is the body of Christ, not a man-made religion under a man who is a vicar or replacement of Christ. My sins are taken away by the blood of Jesus Christ, not a father here on earth. Jesus Christ says that as far as the east is from the west, that is how far my sin is taken from me.
 
Upvote 0

Ave Maria

Ave Maria Gratia Plena
May 31, 2004
41,090
1,994
41
Diocese of Evansville, IN
✟108,671.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Jesus' Church, unfortunately, is divided amongst the various Apostolic Churches including but not limited to: the Anglican/Episcopal Church, the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox Church (which includes the Coptic Orthodox Church among others), the Old Catholic Church, the SSPX, and others. Any Church that has valid apostolic succession is a part of Jesus' Church. Of course, Protestant Churches are also a part of Jesus' Church, they're just not a part of His original Church.
 
Upvote 0

kenblaster5000

Regular Member
Feb 5, 2007
1,942
102
Las Vegas NV
✟10,240.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Jesus' Church, unfortunately, is divided amongst the various Apostolic Churches including but not limited to: the Anglican/Episcopal Church, the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox Church (which includes the Coptic Orthodox Church among others), the Old Catholic Church, the SSPX, and others. Any Church that has valid apostolic succession is a part of Jesus' Church. Of course, Protestant Churches are also a part of Jesus' Church, they're just not a part of His original Church.

In Revelation the loveless church tests the spirits and apostles of the time and find them to be liars. We have done this good work but have fallen from our first love, the day we were truly saved and on fire for the Lord. We must remember love and mercy, for that is what God is about, and anything that is born of God should be like Him. Not be Him, but be like Him. We are being transformed into the image of Jesus Christ from glory to glory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rahmiyn
Upvote 0

rahmiyn

Glad to be here :)
Mar 24, 2009
1,033
100
Florida
✟9,170.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
In Revelation the loveless church tests the spirits and apostles of the time and find them to be liars. We have done this good work but have fallen from our first love, the day we were truly saved and on fire for the Lord. We must remember love and mercy, for that is what God is about, and anything that is born of God should be like Him. Not be Him, but be like Him. We are being transformed into the image of Jesus Christ from glory to glory.
:clap::amen:
 
Upvote 0

BlackSabb

Senior Member
Aug 31, 2006
2,176
152
✟18,140.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I am on a quest to find Christ's church. In Matt 16:18 Jesus says: And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it

Where is his church?


This is a misreading of scripture typical of the Catholic church. The "rock" is NOT Peter! And Peter is not the first Pope hence. You need to read that scripture in context with other passages-not in isolation. This would have to be the most unbelievably common error all denominations make when interpreting scripture. Here is Matthew 16:13-18:


Matthew 16:13-18 (King James Version)



13When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?
14And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
15He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
16And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.
17And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. 18And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.




The "rock" is the confession that Peter made. The confession that Jesus was the Christ, the Son of God. Tell me something. How can any intelligent Christian possibly think that a mere sinful human can be the "rock?" Does not Jesus also say to build your house upon the rock, and not on sand? What is the "rock" in that instance? It is faith in Jesus.

So when Jesus says that he will build his church upon the rock, he is saying that he is the foundation of the church. Peter's confession is the "rock", and that rock is Jesus.

I cannot believe the utter stupidity of church denominations! Honestly. Some churches like the Catholic church have seminary study for a whopping 7 years to become a priest only to come out with totally ludicriously scriptural interpretational crap like that! I don't need to study in any seminary or Bible College to have some common sense that a man can never be a "rock" that the church of Jesus is built upon. How on earth can a person study the Bible for years and years only to believe such obvious twistings? The mind boggles. I would expect a new believer to be able to read that passage of scripture and to realise that the "rock" is the confession that Peter made-not Peter himself.

And yet, it seems that the more "college" and "seminary" trained people become, the dumber they become! The church seems to be the only institution that the more formal study of the Bible you have, the less you understand it. And people of all denominations study formally for years only to come out having such bizarre and obviously ludicrously interpretations such as:


Transubstantiation
Praying to "saints"
Baptising for dead people
Having to keep the OT Sabbath
Having to keep the OT dietary restrictions
Mandatory tithing
Forbidding of accepting blood
Infant baptisms
Interpreting the gift of "tongues" as incoherent babblings
Etc, etc, etc


What is wrong with the majority of church denominations? How can people study one book for years and end up being totally clueless? It would be like someone that was handy working on cars and decides to become a mechanic. And after 4 years of completing his trade, doesn't even know what a spark plug is!! I'm sorry to rant, but this infuriates me. The massive twistings and stupid interpretations of most denominations. And after studying the Bible formally for years.


I sometimes feel like picking up people by the scruff of their neck and shaking some common sense into them. That is how angry I am at the majority of "Christianity" today. I'll give a couple of examples of what I'm talking about.

1..I was speaking to a Catholic youth leader once. Nice guy, very hip and cool. And he didn't even know the difference between the OT and the NT! He even asked me this totally stupid question.

"So, does God make a covenant, wipe it out and make a new covenant?"

What an idiot!!! And he's a leader for crying out loud. I also bumped into a nun that says you don't have to be born again to be saved. What do you say to a moron like that? A nun!!!! Who should know better.

2..I was being witnessed to by 3 Mormon girls. Really attractive, and that's about the only thing you could say about those bimbos. They were trying to convince me that all people will be saved, by some twisting of scriptures in the Gospels along the lines of "The Holy Spirit is given to everyone". Such clueless dimwits, and they go out like the blind leading the blind.


*sheesh*
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Wherever the Gospel is duly preached and the sacraments properly administered, there is the visible church. It may be Protestant, or Catholic, or Orthodox, etc. but it is not to be identified exclusively with any particular denomination or congregation.

The invisible church, the church in the higher sense of the word, is the total of all true believers irrespective of denominational affiliation. This does not mean that every practice and every last belief is equally true or good in God's eyes, or that all church-goers will be saved, but the church itself is an assembly of disciples, in some sense, not a club or narrowly-defined membership organization.
 
Upvote 0

The Time Traveller

Junior Member
May 25, 2008
91
4
Visit site
✟7,731.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Demisheep's original question.

Jesus's Church - Where is it?

It is not to be found on earth. That is why you cannot find it.

According to 1Kings 6:7 the building blocks for Solomon's Temple were prepared off site. The Holy Spirit is preparing each one of us here on earth to be set in our place in heaven.
 
Upvote 0

mumof3

Newbie
Jun 20, 2009
4
0
✟7,614.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Dear Demisheep,

Jesus' church is wherever there is a gathering of believers in which the Gospel is properly preached and the sacraments correctly administered.

The reason people become frustrated in looking is that they begin with the assumption that there is only one such gathering (i.e. some particular denomination).

I agree with this. Believers are the church, it takes the different denominations to draw in the multitudes as we're all made differently i.e some more conservative than others, but unfortunatley where there are people, there is corruption also...I'm trying to say no denomination is going to come up trumps IMO ;)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

kamalayka

Junior Member
Dec 6, 2009
34
6
✟15,218.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I am on a quest to find Christ's church. In Matt 16:18 Jesus says: And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it

Where is his church? I have been looking at history and cannot seem to find his church. Jesus said the gates of hell will not prevail against it so it should still be around today starting from when Jesus said this and never ceasing to exist.

I do not belive his church to be the Catholic church. The Catholic church has too many things setup against the bible's teaching. One example:

1Ti 3:1 This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.
1Ti 3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behavior, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
1Ti 3:3 Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous;
1Ti 3:4 One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;
1Ti 3:5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
1Ti 3:6 Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil.
1Ti 3:7 Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks,

Dre

SO, you think Jesus lied?

He said that the gates of hell shall NEVER prevail.
You seem to think they have, though.

I always believed that if Luther had read the Didache, he would have remained Catholic. . .


Here Is Why you should Consider the Catholic Faith:


The Early Church Fathers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Early Church Fathers were the disciples of the 12 apostles, the disciples of the disciples of the 12 apostles, the disciples of the disciples of the disciples of the 12 apostles, etc. In short they were the Christian leaders who took charge of the Church following the death of the 12 apostles. They were not only taught by the 12 apostles, they were also first-hand witnesses to the creation of the Church worldwide. Most, if not all, were martyred by being crucified, beheaded, fed to the lions at the Roman Coliseum, boiled in oil, or skinned alive. They were the ones empowered by the Holy Spirit (John 16:13 and 1 John 4:6), and who personally handed on the oral teaching of Jesus Christ, before the New Testament canon was created by the Catholic Church in the late 4th century, at the councils of Rome, Hippo, and Carthage. One of the great early ones, St. Clement, is actually mentioned in the bible in Philippians 4:3.

None of these early Church Fathers just stood up and started preaching on his own.

They followed the Biblical model in Acts of “being sent” (Romans 10:15). Who sent them? Jesus sent the 12 apostles (“as the Father sent me, so I send you”). The 12 apostles then laid hands on others and sent them (Acts 6:6). This apostolic tradition has been followed for 2000 years by the Catholic Church, who continuously lays hands on new disciples in every generation since Jesus walked the earth, and then sends them to the four corners of the earth to preach the good news of Jesus Christ, to forgive sins in His Name, and to bring Jesus in the Eucharist to us all. We, the members of the 21rst Century, owe these early Church Fathers a lot of gratitude, because they died horrible deaths in order to preserve and to hand on the Word of God to us today.

A lot of Protestants ignore these early Christian leaders, preferring instead to believe that the history of Christianity began with Jesus and the 12 apostles, and then somehow skipped over 15 centuries to Martin Luther. That would be like saying that the history of the United States began with George Washington in 1776, and then skipped over to Franklin Roosevelt in 1932. For some reason, a lot of Protestants will refuse to read any of the writings of the early Church Fathers, proudly proclaiming to everyone that “Those writings are not in my Bible!” But they will read the writings of Martin Luther, Billy Graham, and Max Lucado, even though those aren’t in the Bible either! They will even read and believe the heretical "Left Behind" books of LaHeye and Jenkins (there is no "secret" rapture of believers mentioned anywhere in the bible. When it happens, according to the bible, there will be trumpet blasts, and every eye will see Jesus). The writings of the early Church Fathers elucidate what is taught in the Bible, so that it’s no mystery whether or not the Eucharist is the actual body, blood, soul, and divinity of Jesus Christ, whether or not Mary is the new Eve, or whether or not there is a purgatory. After all, the early Church Fathers were taught by the 12 apostles, handed on the faith to the next generation, and were then martyred for their actions! Why someone would trust more in the writings of people coming along 15 centuries later over their writings is very strange indeed.

So don't get trapped in the Protestant philosophy that actually says that if it isn't in the Bible, then it can't possibly be true. If that were truly the case, then none of Martin Luther's writings can be seen as true, because they aren't in the Bible either! Take the time to read what our Catholic martyred ancestors had to say. After all, we are all united through time and space in the Eucharist. St. John says in his gospel that if we eat the body of Christ and drink His blood, then Christ abides in us, and we in Him! And because we are all united in Christ, we are all united with each other.

And once non-Catholic Christians start to read these writings of the early Church Fathers, they will soon discover that there were NO Baptists, Lutherans, Methodists, Mormons, Episcopaleans, etc., anywhere in the Early Church. Those traditions of men were all started centuries later, based on what people thought Jesus' Church was all about, rather than on what it actually was.

If you are a seeker of the Truth, please take the time to read the following documents:

1.) Epistle of Clement (who was a disciple of Peter), the 4th Bishop of Rome, to Corinth (96 AD)
He wrote the letter to settle a small schism in Corinth.

Chapters of particular interest:


Chapter 40. Let Us Preserve in the Church the Order Appointed by God.

Chapter 41. (Continuation of the Same Subject.)

Chapter 42. The Order of Ministers in the Church.

Chapter 44. The Ordinances of the Apostles, that There Might Be No Contention Respecting the Priestly Office.

Chapter 59. Warning Against Disobedience. Prayer.

First sentence of Ch.59: "If, however, any shall disobey the words spoken by Him through us[Rome], let them know that they will involve themselves in transgression and serious danger."

What makes this letter all the more amazing was that the Apostle John was STILL alive. . .and he lived CLOSER than Rome! (John died in 100 AD)
Yet, the Church sends to Rome-hmm, wonder why. . .

2.) The Didache, also known as the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (80 AD)

3.) Epistle of Polycarp (was a disciple/ordained as a Bishop by the Apostle John)

4.) 7 Epistles of Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch (also a disciple of John)

To the Ephesians
To the Magnesians
Letter to the Trallians
To the Romans
To the Philadelphians
To the Smyrnaeans
To Polycarp, Bishop of Smyrna
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Some quotes of Early Church Fathers:

Wherever the bishop appears, there let the people be; as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the catholic Church. It is not lawful to baptize or give communion without the consent of the bishop. On the other hand, whatever has his [bishop's] approval is pleasing to God. Thus, whatever is done will be safe and valid. — Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrnaeans 8

Take note of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God. . . . They abstain from the Eucharist [Lord's Supper] and from prayer because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which that Father, in his goodness, raised up again. They who deny the gift of God are perishing in their disputes. — Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrnaeans 6:2–7:1

The Didache (80 AD):

Chapter 7. Concerning Baptism

And concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living water. But if you have not living water, baptize into other water; and if you can not in cold, in warm. But if you have not either, pour out water thrice upon the head into the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit. But before the baptism let the baptizer fast, and the baptized, and whatever others can; but you shall order the baptized to fast one or two days before.

Chapter 8. Concerning Fasting and Prayer (the Lord's Prayer)

But let not your fasts be with the hypocrites; for they fast on the second and fifth day of the week; but fast on the fourth day and the Preparation (Friday). Neither pray as the hypocrites; but as the Lord commanded in His Gospel, thus pray: Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be Your name. Your kingdom come. Your will be done, as in heaven, so on earth. Give us today our daily bread, and forgive us our debt as we also forgive our debtors. And bring us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one; for Yours is the power and the glory for ever. Thrice in the day thus pray.

Chapter 9. The Thanksgiving (Eucharist)

Now concerning the Thanksgiving (Eucharist), thus give thanks. First, concerning the cup: We thank you, our Father, for the holy vine of David Your servant, which You made known to us through Jesus Your Servant; to You be the glory for ever. And concerning the broken bread: We thank You, our Father, for the life and knowledge which You made known to us through Jesus Your Servant; to You be the glory for ever. Even as this broken bread was scattered over the hills, and was gathered together and became one, so let Your Church be gathered together from the ends of the earth into Your kingdom; for Yours is the glory and the power through Jesus Christ for ever. But let no one eat or drink of your Thanksgiving (Eucharist), but they who have been baptized into the name of the Lord; for concerning this also the Lord has said, Give not that which is holy to the dogs.





"The blessed Apostles, then, founded and built up the church in Rome. They committed the office of bishop into the hands of Linus. Of this, Linus, Paul makes mention in the Epistles to Timothy. To him succeeded Anacletus. After him, in the third place from the Apostles, Clement was allotted the office of bishop." St. Irenaeus, "Against All Heresies," c. 180 A.D.

"If, however, any shall disobey the words spoken by Him [the LORD] through us[Rome], let them know that they will involve themselves in transgression and serious danger."
[Bishop of Rome] St. Clement, Epistle to the Corinthians, Chapter 59 (96 AD).

"With [the Church of Rome], because of its superior origin, all the churches must agree... and it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the apostolic tradition."
Irenaeus' Against Heresies (3:3:2) 180 AD

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Arguments against the Protestant Sola Scripture (Scripture Only):

1.) What did the Christians use BEFORE the New Testament was written? (The earliest book is Galatians, written around 49 AD)

2.) Why do Protestants accept the books of the NT in the first place? It was, after all, the Church that canonized the books in the fourth century! By accepting the books chosen for the New Testament, you are accepting Church authority without even realizing it!!

3.) Many Protestants claim that the Church fell into apostasy by the early 300s, and that they incorporated idolatry. If this is true, why would the Church accept books (in a council in 397) which contradicted what it supposedly taught?
That would be like Martin Luther King Jr. accepting the writings of the KKK!
It wouldn't make any sense!!

4.) Jesus said, ". . .if they refuse to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a heathen and a tax collector."
What do you think this "church" Jesus spoke of was like?

5.) The Bible is based on the Church-NOT the other way around!

6.) Just because something is not mentioned in the Bible, it does not mean it isn't true. The authors of the NT were writing to Christians, not non-Christians. They took for granted the fact that their intended audiences already knew about apostolic succession, the sacraments, etc.
Paul, in Hebrews, even refers to these things as "basic doctrines."
"Therefore, let us leave the elementary doctrines of Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again the foundation of repentance from acts that lead to death, and of faith in God, instruction about baptisms, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment." (Hebrews 6)

In other words, the Bible teaches us how to live as Christians-not how to become a Christian!

7.) How can a Protestant determine what is or isn't a heresy? They can't. Satan has found the perfect doctrine to cause division-sola scriptura!
Everyone becomes his own teacher, his own priest, his own pope. That is NOT how God established His Church!!! Sola Scriptura is the epitome of pride!


Obedience is a virtue!
But who is a protestant obedient to? Any teacher that tells them what they want to hear?

Protestants claim that the Bible is the sole absolute of the faith-yet, in a sad twist of irony, it has become the center of relativism! Everyone reads it as they see fit!



You wanna talk about "what is or isn't in the Bible"? Okay, fine!

Where does it say to "pick your own doctrines"?
Where does it say to "be divided"?
Where does it say to "interpret as you please"?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ContraMundum

Messianic Jewish Christian
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2005
15,666
2,957
Visit site
✟78,078.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
When are we going to get sick of the whole "Protestants aren't in the Church/aren't the real Church/have no authority to speak the Word of God" nonsense?

It's really sickening. I can't believe people still think this way.
 
Upvote 0

Ivy

Pray for President Barack Obama
Oct 26, 2005
6,298
707
59
NY State
✟17,402.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I'd have to add that I didn't choose the Catholic Church as a way to be "better" or more "right" than my wonderful Protestant parents and many friends.

That would be the worst reason possible, because it would be based in pride....and God cannot bless pride. Neither would other people be attracted to my faith, because pride alienates people.

For myself, it is best to bear two things in mind:

1) that each part of the Body needs all the others; this "I have no need of you" stuff must stop in all quarters if we are ever to see the unity that Jesus desires

2) Jesus says to us when we gripe about other Christians, "What is that to you? You follow me."

Just my "two" cents. :)
 
Upvote 0

kamalayka

Junior Member
Dec 6, 2009
34
6
✟15,218.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
On what authority did Luther take the Holy Scripture and butcher it by removing books?

On what authority did he leave the true church and build a man-made one?

Never in the church's history has there been so much division as there has been since the protestant reformation.

These are the fruits of sola scriptura, a house of division.


Several years ago, I was a protestant. I was very anti-Catholic. I even thought that the pope was the anti-Christ!!!

However, once I put those books down, and started studying the Church Fathers, I saw the true church.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Did you know that part of the reason why the Romans persecuted the Christians was because they thought they were cannibals!

They thought this because they would overhear Christians talking about "eating flesh," and "drinking blood." They would talk about the Lord's Supper in such literal terms, the pagans believed that Christians were eating people!!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ContraMundum

Messianic Jewish Christian
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2005
15,666
2,957
Visit site
✟78,078.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
On what authority did Luther take the Holy Scripture and butcher it by removing books?

On what authority did he leave the true church and build a man-made one?

Never in the church's history has there been so much division as there has been since the protestant reformation.

These are the fruits of sola scriptura, a house of division.


Several years ago, I was a protestant. I was very anti-Catholic. I even thought that the pope was the anti-Christ!!!

However, once I put those books down, and started studying the Church Fathers, I saw the true church.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Did you know that part of the reason why the Romans persecuted the Christians was because they thought they were cannibals!

They thought this because they would overhear Christians talking about "eating flesh," and "drinking blood." They would talk about the Lord's Supper in such literal terms, the pagans believed that Christians were eating people!!

Here we go....the old "I was Protestant and now let's attack the whole protestant representaiton on the forum and tell everyone why Protestants are wrong" spin coupled with the old "By what authority...?" Catholic-apologetics-for-beginners colloquay demonstration. Shoot me now and get it over with. These questions are very easy to answer...but why bother? No one is going to change sides.

Why not just insult everyone on the forum and be done with it?

What next? Patrick Madrid tapes? Scott Hahn books? Karl Keating perhaps? Anyone for the real apologetics of Gerry "I was protestant and now I'm a sedevacantist" Matatics?

Does anyone really want to flog this dead horse?

Any takers? Anyone?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ContraMundum

Messianic Jewish Christian
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2005
15,666
2,957
Visit site
✟78,078.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I'd have to add that I didn't choose the Catholic Church as a way to be "better" or more "right" than my wonderful Protestant parents and many friends.

That would be the worst reason possible, because it would be based in pride....and God cannot bless pride. Neither would other people be attracted to my faith, because pride alienates people.

For myself, it is best to bear two things in mind:

1) that each part of the Body needs all the others; this "I have no need of you" stuff must stop in all quarters if we are ever to see the unity that Jesus desires

2) Jesus says to us when we gripe about other Christians, "What is that to you? You follow me."

Just my "two" cents. :)

The difference between you and those who are here to argue and fight is that you saw the Catholic Church as God's calling on your life- and it deepened the relationship between you and Him and thus you really don't need to be proven "right" because you are mature and happy in your faith. You don't need others to be "wrong" for you to be right- am I correct here?

Not to mention that your attitude to other Christians is more in step with the Magisterium's approach found in Vatican II documents. Love and respect allows hot heads to cool so that truth can be discussed and sought.

We can all learn a lot about faith and charity from you. Not so sure I see those traits in the apologists who would spend hours trying to prove a protestant wrong but wouldn't take a minute to talk about Jesus to a Muslim or some other non-believer or feed a poor person on the streets. No, to the apologist it's easier to sit on a computer, and meditate long enough on arguments to compile a litany of "errors" of other followers of Jesus Christ and then go tell them why they need to be like them. No thanks for this mere Christian!

I commend you, Ivy! You're the real Catholic deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivy
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I'll volunteer to help you.

On what authority did Luther take the Holy Scripture and butcher it by removing books?

Luther returned to the ancient format that most of the Jews of the first century used. The question of the inclusion--or exclusion--of the Apocryphal books depends mainly upon which group of Hebrews one wants to think had the right lineup of books from the Old Testament. In addition, these books are hardly ever used by anyone to establish doctrine, so different are they from all the other books of the Bible. But Luther still recommended them to be read for instruction in "morals and manners" (ways that the Hebrew operated).

On what authority did he leave the true church...?
That of course supposes that your own decision about what the true church is is more correct than the next person's. Christ founded a movement, a gathering of all peoples, that is, by definition, his church. That church is not a club with dues, membership cards, etc. that other believers in Christ are excluded from.

Never in the church's history has there been so much division as there has been since the protestant reformation.
So much? Well, that depends on how you count. It is estimated that there were about 80 different competing Christian church groups in the first century alone, and that's the era we like to call part of the time of the "Unidivided Church!" So, 80, or 1000 or more, it doesn't matter. And it really doesn't matter if you can understand what "the church" actualliy means (as explained above).

These are the fruits of sola scriptura, a house of division.
That's like defending Communism over Democracy because the former is more efficient in eliminating opposition. Sure, some churches have wanted to make everyone vbe part of their own organization through force, but we don't believe that the is what God would have us do.

Did you know that part of the reason why the Romans persecuted the Christians was because they thought they were cannibals!
Yes. And also that the Romans thought the Christians were atheists because they didn't use idols, statues, and such things as the pagan religions did. They, of course, had no idea how the Medieval Catholic church would turn that around.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

kamalayka

Junior Member
Dec 6, 2009
34
6
✟15,218.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
There were not 80 different groups in the first century arguing each other.

But there ARE 20,000+ protestant denominations, interpreting Scripture any old way.


It is true that Scripture is infallible. But here is what satan won't tell you:

Scripture is only Scripture when is is with Tradition.
(It was Catholics who WROTE the NT!)


The Church has always venerated saints and martyrs. When the Romans killed Christians, it wasn't uncommon to take some of the clothing or bone to venerate.

OSAS is a heresy.
The Rapture is a heresy.
Justification by faith alone is a heresy.

Remember what Scripture says, "not many should become teachers, because their judgment is more severe."

I am not trying to step on toes. I am just saying it like it is. Even Luther accurately predicted that this would happen. He partly regretted the Reformation.

There is not one single thing that all of the protestants can agree on. There are those who don't believe in hell, or the divinity of Jesus, or the Trinity. There are those who justify anything, and nobody is there to say who is right or wrong.

What if the NT was never written??

When Jesus tells us to listen to the church, what do you think He meant by it?

How do you "listen" if there is nobody to listen TO?!

Wanna know when I started questioning protestantism?

When I saw four different ministers all disagree over ONE VERSE. They each went their own way and set up their own church! When I saw the extreme relativity, I was so saddened. I turned to the Church Fathers, and saw the True Jesus Christ.

The true church is not something you read about in the Bible. The true church is living.

If I anger anybody, sorry. But I have to preach the Gospel of Christ, not Luther.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0