So, you've taken a word, redefined it to suit yourself and we should just accept it, right?
The words themselves stand as different. Look them up. As usual, I just use english words the way they are written. I did not redefine anything. Neologism is for the rather marxist/leftist side of the education system and "change" we see happening and that has happened all around. I'm a conservative, because I value truth and reality. Things change for the worse sometimes, as in the society created by liberalism, and I have shown that I enjoy watching that and hearing that it is not. You can't repeat mistakes if you know what they are, unless you are something I do not want to talk about here and now.
So, you've taken a word, redefined it to suit yourself and we should just accept it, right?
Ever heard the word "Gay?" Or "Lesbian?" We conservatives have to live in your world of neologism or get charged with a hate crime or possessing a phobia. How come?
Because we're all just sheeple who'll swallow what we're told.
That is how I see much of the leftist/liberal/progressive worldview. Absolutely. No one can deny that who has interacted with me more then a few times. Yes, I admit what you claim. Though I use the word: bobblehead. Or maybe lemming. Same concept. All rote all the time, is pretty much my position about "the left."
I'm allowed that in a free society am I not? Or did I miss a new law being passed?
Typical of the education system and what it produces for the most part is this dumbing down and liberalizing of society. I live and work in the real world. I talk with and to a lot of people in the Church and outside of it. Bottom line is, that this is really not a game for me in real life. Here on these boards, I do go for sport often, but that is only to ferret out the true nature of people.
In plain words, YES, Christians are hated and intensely so, its just that the side that claims to love tolerance and diversity really only demands homogenization. As in: freethinker, atheist, skeptic, humanist, progressive, liberal. They are in unison so often, why say they are actually different things? Come up with a neologism for all of them to fit together as they do.
But yet it's you, after 159 pages of this thread, who has still to work out that there is nobody here who hates Christians.
That is patently wrong. I asked a question and people engaged in discussion about it. I am only a target often as I disagree with the non and the anti's and expose them for what they are and do. In some cases anti and non Christians don't hate Christians . . . but, its the Christians that agree with them on just about everything that they don't hate. You get a Christian that actually believes in the Bible unaltered and you see hatred like a fire on paper. You can almost see the veins popping out of their necks as they write to destroy the conservative position. It's like debating Keith Olberman. Again, all the ducks in a row.
There are plenty of Christians on this thread, how many of them have recieved any animosity?
Which "kind" of "Christian?"
The liberal and progressive ones seem quite loved by the non and anti's around here.
There's a parable in that. Or actually several.
Why? Because they are not converting these non's and anti's and seem to be celebrating their apostasy and anti-Christian vitriol and attack on Bible-believing Christians. Which side is actually helping the non's and anti's with their membership numbers growing? Don't look at me, I'm not here promoting or proselytizing anyone. I just defend the Apostolic witness and I challenge the usual suspects attacking Christians. Uh, Bible-believing Christians.
Even against yourself I'm not seeing any hatred.
Oh it's hatred. Who you kidding? Just because they recoil from being accused of violating their holy tolerance and diversity mantra, doesn't mean they do not hate intensely. I just bring it out in the open. It's rather simple. You cannot hide the teeth possessed by an Armadillo just because they coil up into a ball when threatened. They also have sharp claws too.
I get reported time and again by people that use far more intense insults towards me than I do them. I am accused of presenting nonsense and yet my message is obviously obvious. When it is said and done, dissent of humanist/progressive ideology must be silenced.
Anger, frustration and disbelief at your judgemental attitude, your bigotry and your word redefining maybe, but not hatred.
I'm not an idiot no matter the rumors and charges laid on my head. Their anger, frustration and disbelief . . . if you watch . . . becomes the vitriol that is harbored against any Christian that dares not submit to progressive humanism and this reengineering of society that has been waged since Dewey signed the Humanist Manifesto.
It is not my fault that leftists deny their own history, and the manipulation they have been subjected to to invoke such knee-jerk hysterical emotionalism when their worldview is challenged and opposed.
Psychotropic medications and STD's, abortions and the commonality of violence in our youth culture, is not the fault of conservative values. They can be traced and fault can be found. But notice that "fault" and "guilt" are words that evoke reaction from certain kinds of people and not in others.
I think the current Obama campaign is a great place to see this raw emotional conditioning. If you read what Marxism is, and then listen to and watch what Obama is doing and saying, you hear and see a Marxist ideology being presented. Of coursr that is change pure and simple, and you cannot fault the guy for being straiforward there. BUT, when challenged on that, you get hysteria and vitriol that Marxism has nothing to do with his redistribution of wealth and his views on society and religion, when in fact it does.
This is just a debate here at this website and in this thread. But still honesty and reality is present too. Why deny it?
Nobody hates Christians, just the ideas that some people stand for.
And that is why I just wrote what I did. Ideas brought to the world BY the Apostles of Jesus Christ are opposed by many, many, many kinds of people.
I'm not one of them.
We'll see how this goes.