Entropy disproves Darwin

O

ondaball

Guest
Every time, in the past 6.25 years on different 'Net forums, that I start a thread @ this, some idiot always says that babies disprove it

Babies are NOT left alone - they are fed, watered, changed, washed etc etc

Each species of life was Designer-made by the Most Brilliant Brain in the Universe

So here's details to explain to your teachers & lecturers, on Monday, why true education is academic freedom of thought, not atheistic brainwashing


ProgettoCosmo - Thermodynamics disproves Darwin

[SIZE=-1]That contradicts entropy. Moreover Neo-Darwinism pretends species evolves ..... until arriving to quantum particles and events for disproving neo-Darwinism. ...[/SIZE]

Evolutionary theory has two major claims. First it supports the hypothesis of abiogenesis (origin of life from matter alone); secondly it supports the hypothesis of Darwinian macroevolution (transformation of all species from a common ancestry), via random mutation and natural selection. We will try to explain simply how laws of thermodynamics and entropy deny these major claims of evolutionary theory...

The second law of thermodynamics (SLOT), called " principle of thermodynamic entropy ", or " principle of growing entropy ", states that in a closed system in average entropy can never decreases (it increases or remains constant). In practice entropy, which is directly proportional to disorder degree, always increases globally at all the levels of organization of the universe..

[SIZE=-1]progettocosmo.altervista.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=85 - Similar pages[/SIZE]


This means that, as we see all around us in growing global pollution & ever-increasing extinction of more species each year, this world is decaying & in its death throes, not improving as it would if Darwin were right


All The Wonders Of The Universe


This goes to the tune of Tony Christie's "Avenues & Alleyways" - an upbeat tune not really suited to the depressing original lyrics, yes?



All the wonders of the universe
join together singing praise to the Lord!

Hills & vegetation
shine in jubilation!

Hear the roaring tide applaud!

Animals & fishes
all creation wishes
to give all they can afford!

O that man would open up his eyes
to behold what nature cries to portray

Telling out the story!
giving God the glory!
calling all mankind to pray!

That's why God prepared it
Jesus came to word it
He's the Truth, the Life, the Way!




INSTRUMENTAL VOICE-OVER


If Darwin were right...

The differences between his..

so-called steps/rungs...

on his so-called evolutionary ladder/chain...

would be as tiny..

as those between..

adjoining frames of a movie film...

SO...

the plain fact...

that we can so clearly distinguish dog from fox from wolf etc...

& even King Charles Spaniel from Cocker...

(with brief apologies to both HRH & rocker Joe!)...

shows all species of life to be...

Designer-Made by the Most Brilliant Brain in the Universe!!!




It was inspired by a summer drive to an AoG Pentecostal conference at Pwllheli..

going from from Wirral all along the lovely A55 Welsh Coast Road..

at the time it was 1st a hit

Could well be even more inspiring a drive in the rich autumn palette of colours



Enjoy!

Ian



BrothersJudd Blog: SOME LIKE IT HOT (via Tom Corcoran):

[SIZE=-1]Darwinism, on the other hand, has to be consistent with it [entropy] and isn't. ... the fact that order arises in violation of entropy disproves ...[/SIZE]






Evolution's Thermodynamic Failure (Granville Sewell, 12/28/2005, American Spectator)
The first formulations of the second law were all about heat: a quantity called thermal "entropy" was defined to measure the randomness, or disorder, associated with a temperature distribution, and it was shown that in an isolated system this entropy always increases, or at least never decreases, as the temperature becomes more and more randomly (more uniformly) distributed. If we define thermal "order" to be the opposite (negative) of thermal entropy, we can say that the thermal order can never increase in a closed (isolated) system.​
It is a well-known prediction of the second law that, in a closed system, every type of order is unstable and must eventually decrease, as everything tends toward more probable (more random) states. Not only will carbon and temperature distributions become more disordered (more uniform), but the performance of all electronic devices will deteriorate, not improve. Natural forces, such as corrosion, erosion, fire and explosions, do not create order, they destroy it...

The second law is all about probability, it uses probability at the microscopic level to predict macroscopic change: the reason carbon distributes itself more and more uniformly in an insulated solid is, that is what the laws of probability predict when diffusion alone is operative...


[SIZE=-1]brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2005/12/some_like_it_ho.html - Similar pages[/SIZE]
 

variant

Happy Cat
Jun 14, 2005
23,625
6,387
✟293,730.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
How cute.

I believe this is PRATT #1

It is a well-known prediction of the second law that, in a closed system, every type of order is unstable and must eventually decrease, as everything tends toward more probable (more random) states. Not only will carbon and temperature distributions become more disordered (more uniform), but the performance of all electronic devices will deteriorate, not improve.Natural forces, such as corrosion, erosion, fire and explosions, do not create order, they destroy it...

The earth is not a closed system.

sun.jpg
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
77
Visit site
✟15,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
I might call creationists making this claim sadistic, hippophilic, necrophiles because they are beating a dead horse. (Who knows where that slight misquote came from(without using google)?) but I guess I won't.

There are three types of systems commonly referred to in thermodynamics, isolated (no flow of energy or matter), closed, (no flow of matter) and open (flow of both energy and matter). The second law states that for reversible transitions between equilibrium states the integral of heat change divided by the temperature dq/T is the entropy change and that when a system is taken through a circular path leading back to the original state the sum of the entropy changes is 0 if all the transitions are perfectly reversible and >0 if there is some irreversiblity. Since all real systems have some reversibility entropy can never decrease in isolated systems. It doesn't say anything about order or disorder and as already pointed out the earth's biosphere is far from an isolated system.

A consequence of the second law is that no process exists whose sole effect is to transfer heat from a cooler body to a warmer body. This would allow the construction of a so-called perpetual motion machine of the second kind.

Evolution requires a series of steps. If no step in a process violates the second law of thermodynamics then the process doesn't violate the second law. The challenge for creationists who claim that evolution violates the second law is to specificially identify a step required for evolution that causes the entropy of a isolated system to decrease. Thermodynamics is a quantitative science so a quantitative answer should be provided.

Do mutatations violate the second law? Obviously not they occur.

Does natural selection violate the second law? Obviously not, it has been observed.

So just what step required for evolution violates the second law?? I have never seen a specific answer to this question from a creationist, only vague handwaving about complexity and information that has no relevance to the question at hand.
 
Upvote 0

Late_Cretaceous

<font color="#880000" ></font&g
Apr 4, 2002
1,965
118
Visit site
✟18,025.00
Faith
Catholic
Here is a quote from a creationist that is right on the money

. Evolution says that we started out simple, and over time became more complex. That just isn't possible: UNLESS there is a giant outside source of energy supplying the Earth with huge amounts of energy. If there were such a source, scientists would certainly know about it.
That's right folks. According to creationists, evolution can only happen if the Earth has an outside source of energy. You heard it right from their mouths. Fortunately, scientists have discovered just such a source of energy, making this particular creationist prediction right.
sun.gif
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SeraphymCrashing

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2007
749
48
✟8,661.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Libertarian
I can't believe anyone is actually still trying to promote this crap. Anyone with even a little bit of knowledge of physics is going to realize that there is no scientific basis for the argument, and by extension any argument that these kind of people make.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

UncleHermit

Regular Member
Nov 3, 2007
717
34
41
✟8,585.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Every time, in the past 6.25 years on different 'Net forums, that I start a thread @ this, some idiot always says that babies disprove it

Babies are NOT left alone - they are fed, watered, changed, washed etc etc

Yes! And the earth receives energy from the sun! Maybe if you think of the earth like a baby, and the sun like a mother, you will start to see that some idiot actually had a point.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums