More evidence for a young earth

http://hrsbstaff.ednet.ns.ca/waymac/History V/timing_is_everything.htm

Radiocarbon dating (C14) uses the amount of carbon 14 available in living creatures as a measuring stick. All living things maintain a content of carbon 14 in equilibrium with that available in the atmosphere, right up to the moment of death.

That's problem #1. If C14 levels were lower 5,000 years ago, then anything that was buried 5,000 years ago will have an apparent date that is much older. C14 production is affected by many things, including even the strength of the earth's magnetic field.

But no matter how much was in the atmosphere at the time (no matter how much you start with), C14 still only has a limited lifetime. After that, you shouldn't be able to detect any C14 in the sample.

When an organism dies, the amount of C14 available within it begins to decay at a half life rate of 5730 years; i.e., it takes 5730 years for 1/2 of the C14 available in the organism to decay. Comparing the amount of C14 in a dead organism to available levels in the atmosphere, produces an estimate of when that organism died. So, for example, if a tree was used as a support for a structure, the date that tree stopped living (i.e., when it was cut down) can be used to date the building's construction date. The organisms which can be used in radiocarbon dating include charcoal, wood, marine shell, human or animal bone, antler, peat; in fact, most of what contains carbon during its life cycle can be used, assuming it's preserved in the archaeological record. The farthest back C14 can be used is about 10 half lives, or 57,000 years; the most recent, relatively reliable dates end at the Industrial Revolution, when humankind busied itself messing up the natural quantities of carbon in the atmosphere. Further limitations, such as the prevalence of modern environmental contamination, require that a suite of C14 dates be used to permit a range of estimated dates.
 
Upvote 0

Morat

Untitled One
Jun 6, 2002
2,725
4
48
Visit site
✟12,690.00
Faith
Atheist
That's problem #1. If C14 levels were lower 5,000 years ago, then anything that was buried 5,000 years ago will have an apparent date that is much older. C14 production is affected by many things, including even the strength of the earth's magnetic field.

  Of course, thanks to using C14 to date things of known age, and little things like "Ice Core samples", we know how what C14 levels were ranging all the way back to the end of the C14 usefullness.

   In Nick's Bizarro World, scientists don't think of things like this, and if they do, they certainly don't work on dealing with it.

 
 
Upvote 0

Corey

Veteran
Mar 7, 2002
2,874
156
49
Illinois
Visit site
✟18,987.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Originally posted by npetreley
It's not reliable beyond 40,000 years because there shouldn't be any detectable C14 left by that time. That's the point.

That's what they assert too.

...because all detectable 14C should have decayed away in a fraction of that alleged time — a few tens of thousands of years.

Yet they give no reference as to why it should be so. In addition, they were forced to do a test on something that should not have been tested that way. I wonder how it would look if they did the proper test. Hmmm?
 
Upvote 0