rest hereMitt Romney's endless bragging about his wealth and success has kept him near the top of the Republican polls, but he's running for the nomination of a party that has nothing left to sell.
rest hereMitt Romney's endless bragging about his wealth and success has kept him near the top of the Republican polls, but he's running for the nomination of a party that has nothing left to sell.
Could someone fill me in on the more meaningful differences between a bloodsucking CEO and a politician?
EDIT: mainly observed character traits and such
Article attacks Romney and offers little substance. I guess you could say that it offers a bit of light on venture capitalism, but only after weeding through paragraphs of non-substantive attacks on Romney.
There have got to be more substantive criticisms of Romney out there than that. If that's the worst that can be done, I'm taking another look at Romney.
I was outvoted. I'm fine accepting the consensus going against me. Just as I'll enforce the rules as they are decided, so to will I post in accordance with the rules as they are decided. I was overruled in that and other reports and accept that.After reading your posts in this thread:
http://foru.ms/t6292847-general-political-discussion-voegelin-10-20-2007.html
this thread seems more than just a little hypocritical. I'm just sayin'.
but he's running for the nomination of a party that has nothing left to sell.http://www.alternet.org/story/66068/
I don't think that the Republican party is quite in shambles enough to fall for the shennangins of a huckster like Romney yet...
Edwards has no chance of winning, but it is funny to see the way somebody calls another based on their job.no but the democrats have fallen for an ambulance chaser, John 'do what i say not what i do' Edwards...
Edwards has no chance of winning, but it is funny to see the way somebody calls another based on their job.
I dont care for his actions either, but to say the democrats have fallen for Edwards when he really has no chance in winning, is over the top.actually it is his actions as a lawyer that i find disgusting.
I dont care for his actions either, but to say the democrats have fallen for Edwards when he really has no chance in winning, is over the top.
he is in the top 3, that makes him very relevant wrt the democratic mindshare.
For the seven days ending October 28, 2007,
Hillary Clinton earns 44% of the vote.
Barack Obama is second at 20% followed by
John Edwards at 14%.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...election/2008_democratic_presidential_primary
Very relevant?
For the seven days ending October 28, 2007,
Hillary Clinton earns 44% of the vote.
Barack Obama is second at 20% followed by
John Edwards at 14%.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...election/2008_democratic_presidential_primary
Very relevant?