TrueWords said:Isaiah 53
Like i said, this can be easily porved by merely going to the bread and taking it out for a year in the rain and moss etc, lets see what happens.
Of course you know you are safe in suggesting such a thing for the Church would never do it as it would be commiting great sacriledge if it did . . .
So it is a perfectly safe thing for you to suggest as you will never be proven wrong as you KNOW it will never be done since the Church would never treat The Real Presence is such a sacrilidgeous manner..
So you present a test that you know can never happen . . .
Quite a safe place to argue from if you ask me . . . and quite a CONTRIVED place of safety . . .
It does not absolve you from honestly looking at the evidence that CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES that such a test as you propse IS NOT NECESSARY for the proof you are looking for to be evidenced . . .
A refusal to give the evidence already provided that proves what you want proven and then argue that only the test you propose would be valid, is a logical fallacy . . .
One cannot deliberately ignore actual and solid evidence that PROVES your position is wrong and then pretend it doesn't exist, and make a vaid argument against it. . . .
Actually we do not need to even do that. if there has ever in history been any instance where a bomb hit a rekligious building called a church and destroyed the bread or if a person every vomited up the host or if the bread every went bad or left out etc, that would prove my point.
How would that prove your point? You would simply prove that God did not condenscend to make the miracle of the Eucharist visibly obvious to all in those circumstances.
That is ALL you would prove . . nothing more . . .
i am sure if we search hard enough we will find instances of this. if the bread is now the literal body of jesus it cannot be corrupted. point proved,
NEXT!!!
You only continue to prove your lack of understanding of the miracle of the Eucharist . . .
You only would prove that God did not condensend to make the miracle of the Ecuharist VISIBLE to the eyes of all in such circumstance . . .
By your reasoning and logic, it would be just as valid to say that because we do not see and touch Jesus with our eyes and hands when we pray together, then He is not really in our midst . . . .
To be carnally minded, to trust in what we can see, taste, touch, hear, feel is not of God . . .
Peace to all
Upvote
0