Only One Church

Status
Not open for further replies.

LilyLamb

The Lord is My Shepherd
Feb 5, 2002
588
1
63
Virginia
Visit site
✟1,180.00
I just realized that there is only one Christian church that keeps the scriptures regarding women preachers ... the Catholic church!!

Our church is in between pastors and is interviewing for this position. If we get a woman pastor, as some are wont to do, then I am going to insist that my DH take us to the Catholic church.

I don't have anything against women who minister within the church ... but I firmly draw the line at preaching ... those passages are just too clear to me.
 

LilyLamb

The Lord is My Shepherd
Feb 5, 2002
588
1
63
Virginia
Visit site
✟1,180.00
I'm presently Southern Baptist ... and that one particular branch may not allow women preachers, but the whole Baptist structure is falling apart and Baptist churches are changing to accomodate this. Your Southern Baptist church today may very easily become a more liberal (mainstream) one tomorrow. The Catholic church is the same whether it be in the south, the north, the east or west.

I think the Catholic church is also the only church that is openly outspoken against abortion. The Baptist won't commit to it one way or the other.
 
Upvote 0

LilyLamb

The Lord is My Shepherd
Feb 5, 2002
588
1
63
Virginia
Visit site
✟1,180.00
Yes, which makes it very difficult to walk into a Baptist church and expect it to be the same as the last one you attended. We left a very conservative Baptist church because they kept making derogatory comments about the Catholic church and because they would not support my son when he went on a mission trip with an international organization to a "Methodist" orphan camp in Hungary.

As if the Baptist have a monopoly on the gospel. :(

Our present Baptist church is very supportive, but the majority there are leaning towards Mainstream and are open to interviewing women for our pastoral position. :(

:sigh:
 
Upvote 0

LilyLamb

The Lord is My Shepherd
Feb 5, 2002
588
1
63
Virginia
Visit site
✟1,180.00
1 Corinthians 14:34 "Let your women keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak; but they are to be submissive, as the law also says. And if they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is shameful for women to speak in church."

2 Timothy chapter 2, verses 12-13 "And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence. For Adam was formed first, then Eve."

There's a lot one can read into this, but the bottom line is that women are not to be preachers, teach, or have authority over a man in the CHURCHES ... that doesn't mean that she can't sing to or worship God. This is dealing with the position of authority - which God gave to man.

I don't know of the historical teachings that have kept men in the priesthood of the Catholic church ... maybe Wols, KC or someone can share that with us.
 
Upvote 0

kern

Miserere Nobis
Apr 14, 2002
2,171
7
44
Florida, USA
Visit site
✟3,249.00
Faith
Catholic
I still question why people use only an implication of this verse while ignoring the completely literal reading of it. I'm not a strict literalist myself, but it seems that this verse says straight out that women cannot speak at all in church. No responsorial psalm, no "and also with you", no nicene creed, no "amen" at the communion, no "peace be with you", etc. It's possible that reading it in the context of the whole chapter it applies only to speaking prophecies or speaking in tongues, but I don't know if this is a tenable position.

That second verse can also be read literally to prohibit women from being schoolteachers, although this seems to have never been a seriously considered interpretation of the passage. And what does that verse at the end about "saved in childbearing" mean? That's an odd passage any way you look at it.

As I've said before, I may be a bit biased because my aunt is a Methodist minister.

-Chris
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

LilyLamb

The Lord is My Shepherd
Feb 5, 2002
588
1
63
Virginia
Visit site
✟1,180.00
Yes, I am totally submissive to my husband at home, he is a very godly, loving man whom I feel very blessed to have in my life. He speaks my love language and I speak his. :) I think the woman's role in being submissive to her husband is a godly thing to do. :)

The implications behind not being able to speak at all is why I wanted to see the historical view of a woman's role in the churches. Since there are several references to older women teaching the younger women in the epistles, I'm sure they were allowed to teach - just not men.
 
Upvote 0

cheezit

Saved in 1976
Apr 11, 2002
196
0
Visit site
✟500.00
Faith
Baptist
If women are to be totally quiet in church, then Paul contradicts himself more than once.

One example is Romans 16:1-2: "1 I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant(deaconess) of the church in Cenchrea. 2 I ask you to receive her in the Lord in a way worthy of the saints and to give her any help she may need from you, for she has been a great help to many people, including me."

She was a servant in the church. It doesn't seem quite plausible that she could be a servant or deaconess in the church if she was not allowed to say a word.

As for women being Pastors or Preachers, I personally don't have a problem with it. As long as souls are led to the Lord, that is what really counts. Does it not?
 
Upvote 0

allieisme

I am ME
Apr 1, 2002
14,705
359
48
✟19,803.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I think being submissive is totally over-stated here..or maybe I'm taking "submissive" to seriously.
I agree some one has to be the head of household, but that doesnt mean I have to listen or agree with anything, and everything my husband does..Its called being equal..
So if your husband tells you to go cook, do you do it because you want to or because he tells you to?..Do you clean the house when you feels it needs it, or when he tells you to do it? Just things like that I dont think are being submissive or Godly.

Allison
 
Upvote 0

VOW

Moderator
Feb 7, 2002
6,912
15
71
*displaced* CA, soon to be AZ!
Visit site
✟28,000.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I think the NT verses are only part of the reason why the Catholic Church has men for the priesthood. Another reason is that Jesus was a Man, and He chose only men as His Disciples. Now, I know there were lesser disciples, and some of them probably were women, but the priesthood in the Catholic Church is Apostolic, and the example set up by Christ Himself was with men in the leadership roles. With that in mind, I can understand the Church's position. I do feel that we have all learned over the past 2000 years that women can be just as smart, just as inspirational, just as good of leaders as men can. But we look to the example of Jesus.

Women still hold VALUABLE positions in the Church, however. You can't dispute the incredible contribution that nuns make, and all of us certainly know of lay ministers who have been women.


Peace be with you,
~VOW
 
Upvote 0

Mr.Cheese

Legend
Apr 14, 2002
10,141
531
✟21,948.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Another way to read those passages is wife/husband. If you study some of the context in which Paul's letters were written you find that he is addressing problems in individual churches. I think women had a lot of freedom with Paul. It is possible that Phoebe (I think that's the one) helped build churches with Paul. The only thing that isn't clear to me is women as senior pastors, or a position of church oversight.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

fragmentsofdreams

Critical loyalist
Apr 18, 2002
10,339
431
20
CA
Visit site
✟28,828.00
Faith
Catholic
Originally posted by VOW
I think the NT verses are only part of the reason why the Catholic Church has men for the priesthood. Another reason is that Jesus was a Man, and He chose only men as His Disciples. Now, I know there were lesser disciples, and some of them probably were women, but the priesthood in the Catholic Church is Apostolic, and the example set up by Christ Himself was with men in the leadership roles. With that in mind, I can understand the Church's position. I do feel that we have all learned over the past 2000 years that women can be just as smart, just as inspirational, just as good of leaders as men can. But we look to the example of Jesus.

Women still hold VALUABLE positions in the Church, however. You can't dispute the incredible contribution that nuns make, and all of us certainly know of lay ministers who have been women.


Peace be with you,
~VOW

I think John Paul II's position is that because Christ did not ordain women, he does not feel authorized to do so. I don't believe that the Church has made any dogmatic statements yet.
 
Upvote 0

LilyLamb

The Lord is My Shepherd
Feb 5, 2002
588
1
63
Virginia
Visit site
✟1,180.00
cheezit - I don't believe scripture contradicts itself ... try not to read more into it than is there ... since scripture does not contradict itself, you can see that women did have various duties of SERVICE within the church, but that does not mean they had an authoritative role over men.

That is the main point of this whole reference regarding the role of men and women in the church ... men are the head, women are the lesser, weaker vessel. That has nothing at all to do with their individual salvation. Men and women are equal in the eyes of God as far as need for salvation and the means of salvation.

Technically what you call a deaconess is not scriptural ... as deacons are scripturally called to "be the husband of one wife" ... literally that is not possible for a woman.

But that's reading more into it than we should, imho.

allieisme - I don't think the wife's submissive role to her husband really has anything to do with whether she can be a preacher. That's a whole 'nuther subject. As far as agreeing to everything he tells me to do, I'll just write our conversation this afternoon ...

Me: (after telling him about this thread): you do think I'm submissive, don't you.

DH: big grin :D Yes!

Me: what does "submissive" mean to you?

DH: (without any hesitation) It means you totally agree with anything I say.

Me: (laughing) Can I enlighten you on something?

DH: (laughing) Ahhh, sure?

Me: It doesn't mean I agree with you, but you do get the final say-so as the head of the house. (big grin) :D

DH: (big grin) Yeah! I'll go with that!!! :D

We have one of those blessedly wonderful relationships where we love each other madly and would do anything for each other ... seriously ... after picking my first husband and making a total mess of my life and the lives of three children I let God decide if I would remarry again after he left our family. God did decide and He did the pickin' and boy does He know what He's doing when HE joins two people together. :D
 
Upvote 0

fragmentsofdreams

Critical loyalist
Apr 18, 2002
10,339
431
20
CA
Visit site
✟28,828.00
Faith
Catholic
LilyLamb

That is the main point of this whole reference regarding the role of men and women in the church ... men are the head, women are the lesser, weaker vessel. That has nothing at all to do with their individual salvation. Men and women are equal in the eyes of God as far as need for salvation and the means of salvation.

Why do you consider women to be weaker vessels?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

cheezit

Saved in 1976
Apr 11, 2002
196
0
Visit site
✟500.00
Faith
Baptist
"cheezit - I don't believe scripture contradicts itself.."
Neither do I. I was pointing out an example of where Paul said that women talked in church. The verses you quoted, to me anyway, were directed at the churches that he wrote the letters to originally. This would have almost have to have been the case or for him to have said what he said in Romans would have been a contradiction. And I agree, the Bible does not contradict itself.

"Technically what you call a deaconess is not scriptural"

That is probably true. I put the word deaconess in parenthese because it was a footnote in the online Bible I used. They used it as another possible word for servant.

Women may be considered the weaker vessel, but that doesn't mean they have to keep quiet in the church. Some of the very first churches, if not all of them, were in peoples houses. I doesn't seem right that women should be expected to be quiet, especially if it was their own house. :)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.