Another question: What's the basis for the Catholic priesthood?

Status
Not open for further replies.

pax

Veteran
Apr 3, 2002
1,718
95
Michigan
Visit site
✟2,780.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
In the footnotes for Hebrews 10:10 I found this:

5 [11-18] Whereas the levitical priesthood offered daily sacrifices that were ineffectual in remitting sin (Hebrews 10:11), Jesus offered a single sacrifice that won him a permanent place at God's right hand. There he has only to await the final outcome of his work (Hebrews 10:12-13; cf Psalm 110:1). Thus he has brought into being in his own person the new covenant prophesied by Jeremiah (Jer 31:33-34) that has rendered meaningless all other offerings for sin (Hebrews 10:14-18).

From what I could find in the Catechism this section on Holy orders may help clear up some confusion:

II. The Sacrament of Holy Orders in the Economy of Salvation

The priesthood of the Old Covenant


1539
The chosen people was constituted by God as "a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.";6 But within the people of Israel, God chose one of the twelve tribes, that of Levi, and set it apart for liturgical service; God himself is its inheritance.7 A special rite consecrated the beginnings of the priesthood of the Old Covenant. The priests are "appointed to act on behalf of men in relation to God, to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins."8


1540
Instituted to proclaim the Word of God and to restore communion with God by sacrifices and prayer,9 this priesthood nevertheless remains powerless to bring about salvation, needing to repeat its sacrifices ceaselessly and being unable to achieve a definitive sanctification, which only the sacrifice of Christ would accomplish.10


1541
The liturgy of the Church, however, sees in the priesthood of Aaron and the service of the Levites, as in the institution of the seventy elders,11 a prefiguring of the ordained ministry of the New Covenant. Thus in the Latin Rite the Church prays in the consecratory preface of the ordination of bishops:


God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, . . .
by your gracious word
you have established the plan of your Church.

From the beginning,
you chose the descendants of Abraham to be your holy nation.
You established rulers and priests,
and did not leave your sanctuary without ministers to serve you. . . .12


1542
At the ordination of priests, the Church prays:


Lord, holy Father, . . .
when you had appointed high priests to rule your people,
you chose other men next to them in rank and dignity
to be with them and to help them in their task. . . .

you extended the spirit of Moses to seventy wise men. . . .
You shared among the sons of Aaron
the fullness of their father's power.13


1543
In the consecratory prayer for ordination of deacons, the Church confesses:


Almighty God . . . ,
You make the Church, Christ's body,
grow to its full stature as a new and greater temple.
You enrich it with every kind of grace
and perfect it with a diversity of members
to serve the whole body in a wonderful pattern of unity.

You established a threefold ministry of worship and service,
for the glory of your name.
As ministers of your tabernacle you chose the sons of Levi
and gave them your blessing as their everlasting inheritance.14
The one priesthood of Christ


1544
Everything that the priesthood of the Old Covenant prefigured finds its fulfillment in Christ Jesus, the "one mediator between God and men."15 The Christian tradition considers Melchizedek, "priest of God Most High," as a prefiguration of the priesthood of Christ, the unique "high priest after the order of Melchizedek";16 "holy, blameless, unstained,"17 "by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are sanctified,"18 that is, by the unique sacrifice of the cross.


1545
The redemptive sacrifice of Christ is unique, accomplished once for all; yet it is made present in the Eucharistic sacrifice of the Church. The same is true of the one priesthood of Christ; it is made present through the ministerial priesthood without diminishing the uniqueness of Christ's priesthood: "Only Christ is the true priest, the others being only his ministers."19
Two participations in the one priesthood of Christ


1546
Christ, high priest and unique mediator, has made of the Church "a kingdom, priests for his God and Father."20 The whole community of believers is, as such, priestly. The faithful exercise their baptismal priesthood through their participation, each according to his own vocation, in Christ's mission as priest, prophet, and king. Through the sacraments of Baptism and Confirmation the faithful are "consecrated to be . . . a holy priesthood."21


1547
The ministerial or hierarchical priesthood of bishops and priests, and the common priesthood of all the faithful participate, "each in its own proper way, in the one priesthood of Christ." While being "ordered one to another," they differ essentially.22 In what sense? While the common priesthood of the faithful is exercised by the unfolding of baptismal grace –—a life of faith, hope, and charity, a life according to the Spirit—, the ministerial priesthood is at the service of the common priesthood. It is directed at the unfolding of the baptismal grace of all Christians. The ministerial priesthood is a means by which Christ unceasingly builds up and leads his Church. For this reason it is transmitted by its own sacrament, the sacrament of Holy Orders.
In the person of Christ the Head . . .


1548
In the ecclesial service of the ordained minister, it is Christ himself who is present to his Church as Head of his Body, Shepherd of his flock, high priest of the redemptive sacrifice, Teacher of Truth. This is what the Church means by saying that the priest, by virtue of the sacrament of Holy Orders, acts in persona Christi Capitis:23


It is the same priest, Christ Jesus, whose sacred person his minister truly represents. Now the minister, by reason of the sacerdotal consecration which he has received, is truly made like to the high priest and possesses the authority to act in the power and place of the person of Christ himself (virtute ac persona ipsius Christi).24

Christ is the source of all priesthood: the priest of the old law was a figure of Christ, and the priest of the new law acts in the person of Christ.25


1549
Through the ordained ministry, especially that of bishops and priests, the presence of Christ as head of the Church is made visible in the midst of the community of believers.26 In the beautiful expression of St. Ignatius of Antioch, the bishop is typos tou Patros: he is like the living image of God the Father.27


1550
This presence of Christ in the minister is not to be understood as if the latter were preserved from all human weaknesses, the spirit of domination, error, even sin. The power of the Holy Spirit does not guarantee all acts of ministers in the same way. While this guarantee extends to the sacraments, so that even the minister's sin cannot impede the fruit of grace, in many other acts the minister leaves human traces that are not always signs of fidelity to the Gospel and consequently can harm the apostolic fruitfulness of the Church.


1551
This priesthood is ministerial. "That office . . . which the Lord committed to the pastors of his people, is in the strict sense of the term a service."28 It is entirely related to Christ and to men. It depends entirely on Christ and on his unique priesthood; it has been instituted for the good of men and the communion of the Church. The sacrament of Holy Orders communicates a "sacred power" which is none other than that of Christ. The exercise of this authority must therefore be measured against the model of Christ, who by love made himself the least and the servant of all.29 "The Lord said clearly that concern for his flock was proof of love for him."30
. . . "in the name of the whole Church"


1552
The ministerial priesthood has the task not only of representing Christ—Head of the Church—before the assembly of the faithful, but also of acting in the name of the whole Church when presenting to God the prayer of the Church, and above all when offering the Eucharistic sacrifice.31


1553
"In the name of the whole Church" does not mean that priests are the delegates of the community. The prayer and offering of the Church are inseparable from the prayer and offering of Christ, her head; it is always the case that Christ worships in and through his Church. The whole Church, the Body of Christ, prays and offers herself "through him, with him, in him," in the unity of the Holy Spirit, to God the Father. The whole Body, caput et membra, prays and offers itself, and therefore those who in the Body are especially his ministers are called ministers not only of Christ, but also of the Church. It is because the ministerial priesthood represents Christ that it can represent the Church.

Basically the Bishops are believed to be successors of the Apostles. Jesus said "As the Father sends me, so I send you" telling his disciples to go into the world and do some of the things he had done. The Apostles ordained others who ordained others, who ordained others etc... Every Bishop in the world today somewhere along the line of people that ordained him at the beginning was an Apostle who was ordained by Christ himself. Just as Christ created the office of Bishop the bishops created the office of Priest so that the priests may spread God's message to the world.
 
Upvote 0
The basis for both the ministerial priesthood ("priests") and the baptismal priesthood (believers... the priesthood of all the baptized) is their participation in the one priesthood of Christ. The ministerial priesthood is specifically in service to the other group and also carries on the mission Christ gave to the apostles.

It is true, the OT priesthood was a foreshadow of the priesthood of Christ. The OT sacrifices did not do what the cross did.

The Catholic Catechism is readable on the topic, and the previous poster gave a paste of it. I don't know if you wanted any extra comment beyond that, so just my two cents.
 
Upvote 0
One other thing to keep in mind, the term Priest, in English, is a translation of the latin Sacredos which is a *terrible* translation of the greek word Presbyter, which means elder. The original term, Presbyter, is still used in a few Catholic Churches as a normative term (mine included). Our Canons, Liturgy, etc.. always refer to the second order of ministry as Presbyter. In the Roman Church, and in virtually all Catholic Churches, you can look at a Priest/Presbyter Ordination certificate or licence, and you will see the words Presbyterate, Presbyter, etc... on the certificates.

The Presbyterate has an interesting history. Originally, the two normative orders were Bishops and Deacons, the Presbyters evolving over time to assist in the management of the Church and in assisting the Bishop-Celebrant at the Lord's Table. After about 200 a.d., and even more heavily after the legalisation of Christianity in the 330's, the Presbyterate underwent a major change. Bishops were no longer in charge of two to three hundred Christians, but of thousands of Christains in their cities (later Dicoese). They could not celebrate and preach for all of them, so the Presbyters were finally given licence to officiate on a regular basis at the Eucharist around 390.

The first mention in the Ordination rite of the Presbyter that we have of the power to celebrate the Eucharist is found in the Gregorian Sacramentary, c. 500-600 a.d.

Again, hope this has been helpful.

Father Rob
Anglican Catholic
 
Upvote 0

isshinwhat

Pro Deo et Patria
Apr 12, 2002
8,338
624
Visit site
✟13,555.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Hey Jason,

We know that Christ is the high Priest in the order of Melchedizek from the letters of St. Paul. Melchedizek offered up bread and wine, as did Christ at the Last Supper. Christ told his Apostles to continue to do this in his memory.

Romans 15:15-17 But on some points I have written to you very boldly by way of reminder, because of the grace given me by God to be a minister of Christ Jesus to the Gentiles in the priestly service of the gospel of God, so that the offering of the Gentiles may be acceptable, sanctified by the Holy Spirit. In Christ Jesus, then, I have reason to be proud of my work for God.

Colossians 1:24
Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ's afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church,

The priestly portion of a Reverend's duty is to allow us to Sacramentally join everything that we offer to the Father with the sacrifice of Christ where it will please God. Christ gave his Apostles and their sucessors this ministry at the Last Supper. There was but one sacrifice, but we offer our sacrifices up with it forever. Remember the Lamb of Revelations that sat before the Father in Heaven was a slain Lamb.

Sorry, but I'm in between exams...if this doesn't make sense, I apologize, but I'm in a real hurry.

God Bless you all, My Friends,

Neal
 
Upvote 0

niwde

Active Member
Mar 7, 2002
256
1
38
Visit site
✟643.00
the priesthood is the greatest and best job oneself could have
to lead the flock and a full time worker in his vineyard
we believers r only semi-workers that is to share our faith with others
not like the priest
spreading the word of god is their job from morning to night
they need not go to office and sit there and wait for a pay
 
Upvote 0

Chili

Active Member
Apr 19, 2002
163
0
Visit site
✟445.00
Revelations talks about no marriage in heaven. Heaven is when the kundalini is raised to the 7th level (we call this Coronation or Sahasrara; Pure Reason is blue) and away from the bottom of the spine where it is been dormant except for the occasional call to action.
As the kundalini is raised the 'bloodflow' to the lower parts of the body is reduced and celibacy is easily mastered by the priest who is called to be at the fourth level of chakra during ordination (which is celebrated with the "laying on of hands)." The fourth level is aimed to raise the spiritual awakening to the heart in which the ordinate is envisioned by a surrounding light and seeing this divine light he becomes filled with wonder and desires to raise the kundalini to its fullness of the seventh level (on towards Easter which is the seventh day on which darkness night did not follow the day). It is expected that after the fourth level his mind does not return to the "lower centers" because when the image of night is gone also its invitation to participate will be gone ("no night" Rev.22:5 because of the everlasting light).
The above makes celibacy a necessary condition for a priest (if indeed he is called to be a priest prior to ordination), and one must wonder why only Catholicism is aware of this fact in Christendom.
 
Upvote 0

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
43
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟10,659.00
Faith
Catholic
Originally posted by Chili
Revelations talks about no marriage in heaven. Heaven is when the kundalini is raised to the 7th level (we call this Coronation or Sahasrara; Pure Reason is blue) and away from the bottom of the spine where it is been dormant except for the occasional call to action.
As the kundalini is raised the 'bloodflow' to the lower parts of the body is reduced and celibacy is easily mastered by the priest who is called to be at the fourth level of chakra during ordination (which is celebrated with the "laying on of hands)." The fourth level is aimed to raise the spiritual awakening to the heart in which the ordinate is envisioned by a surrounding light and seeing this divine light he becomes filled with wonder and desires to raise the kundalini to its fullness of the seventh level (on towards Easter which is the seventh day on which darkness night did not follow the day). It is expected that after the fourth level his mind does not return to the "lower centers" because when the image of night is gone also its invitation to participate will be gone ("no night" Rev.22:5 because of the everlasting light).
The above makes celibacy a necessary condition for a priest (if indeed he is called to be a priest prior to ordination), and one must wonder why only Catholicism is aware of this fact in Christendom.

chakra? kundalini? This sounds like yoga. I seriously believe mixing this kind of yoga with Christianity is dangerous. I was there once...and it was painful, especially all the nightmares. Thank God He set me free!

-Jason
 
Upvote 0

Chili

Active Member
Apr 19, 2002
163
0
Visit site
✟445.00
Originally posted by Hoonbaba


chakra? kundalini? This sounds like yoga. I seriously believe mixing this kind of yoga with Christianity is dangerous. I was there once...and it was painful, especially all the nightmares. Thank God He set me free!

-Jason

Jason maybe yours was not accompanied by a Beatific Vision in which case you were handed a scorpion instead of a fish. That would explain the nightmares.
 
Upvote 0

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
43
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟10,659.00
Faith
Catholic
Originally posted by Chili


Jason maybe yours was not accompanied by a Beatific Vision in which case you were handed a scorpion instead of a fish. That would explain the nightmares.

Chili,

I have no idea what you're talk'n about. This page, written by a Catholic, clearly points out that Catholicism and Yoga do not go together:

http://catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0275.html

God bless

-Jason
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

seebs

God Made Me A Skeptic
Apr 9, 2002
31,914
1,529
18
Saint Paul, MN
Visit site
✟55,225.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Originally posted by Hoonbaba
Hi guys,

I have a quick question: What's the basis for the Catholic priesthood?

Doesn't Heb 10:10-14 contradict it?

-Jason

I've sometimes wondered that myself; I can't find anything that really establishes that there *should* be a "priesthood".
 
Upvote 0

Chili

Active Member
Apr 19, 2002
163
0
Visit site
✟445.00
Hansel and Grethel thought the same thing when they first went into the forest. They put out breadcrumbs as deeds of righteousness and soon found that they were lost because the ravens (evil) had picked them away and so they died while doing good works while lost in the journey of life.

The priesthood helps us to carve altars (sacraments) along our journey of life and if ever we get lost we will always find our way home, and right back into Eden.
 
Upvote 0

patriarch

Senior Member
Mar 6, 2002
533
4
Illinois
Visit site
✟1,052.00
Faith
Catholic
Originally posted by Chili


Jason maybe yours was not accompanied by a Beatific Vision in which case you were handed a scorpion instead of a fish. That would explain the nightmares.

Chili,

For the sake of any non-Catholics who may have the misfortune to read your stuff, Chili, I have to say that there is only a very tangential relationship between what you write and what the Church teaches. Not to put too fine a point on it, it is wierd, idiosyncratic, syncretic, contrary to the teachings of the Church, unhelpful and a complete waste of time for anyone seeking the truth of the Catholic faith. Not only are you in no position to teach, you badly need to unlearn a great deal of what you think you know. If you are looking for a venue in which to put forth original and novel theologies, this isn't it.

P.S. No one on this planet has had the Beatific Vision,
and I find the strong implication that you have had it both amusing and worrisome.

Bye for now,

Lee
 
Upvote 0

Chili

Active Member
Apr 19, 2002
163
0
Visit site
✟445.00
Originally posted by patriarch


Chili,

For the sake of any non-Catholics who may have the misfortune to read your stuff, Chili, I have to say that there is only a very tangential relationship between what you write and what the Church teaches. Not to put too fine a point on it, it is wierd, idiosyncratic, syncretic, contrary to the teachings of the Church, unhelpful and a complete waste of time for anyone seeking the truth of the Catholic faith. Not only are you in no position to teach, you badly need to unlearn a great deal of what you think you know. If you are looking for a venue in which to put forth original and novel theologies, this isn't it.

P.S. No one on this planet has had the Beatific Vision,
and I find the strong implication that you have had it both amusing and worrisome.

Bye for now,

Lee

Thanks, Lee but there is nothing novel about my theologies. It may be new to you but that is no reason to suggest I leave. So why do you think "no one" and if so how can we have knowledge thereoff."

Many have seen "the light" and if that is possible why is a Beatific Vision not possible? Leave me out of the argument because I never suggested I did.
 
Upvote 0

Wolseley

Beaucoup-Diên-Cai-Dāu
Feb 5, 2002
21,133
5,624
63
By the shores of Gitchee-Goomee
✟276,960.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Revelations talks about no marriage in heaven. Heaven is when the kundalini is raised to the 7th level (we call this Coronation or Sahasrara; Pure Reason is blue) and away from the bottom of the spine where it is been dormant except for the occasional call to action.
As the kundalini is raised the 'bloodflow' to the lower parts of the body is reduced and celibacy is easily mastered by the priest who is called to be at the fourth level of chakra during ordination (which is celebrated with the "laying on of hands)." The fourth level is aimed to raise the spiritual awakening to the heart in which the ordinate is envisioned by a surrounding light and seeing this divine light he becomes filled with wonder and desires to raise the kundalini to its fullness of the seventh level (on towards Easter which is the seventh day on which darkness night did not follow the day). It is expected that after the fourth level his mind does not return to the "lower centers" because when the image of night is gone also its invitation to participate will be gone ("no night" Rev.22:5 because of the everlasting light).
Absolute and utter gibberish. I haven't read such a mish-mash of New Age/Hindu mystic/neo-Gnostic nonsense in a long time. patriarch, I'm afraid I have to agree with you. Whatever stew Chili is serving up here, it is definitely not Catholicism.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Chili

Active Member
Apr 19, 2002
163
0
Visit site
✟445.00
Originally posted by Wolseley

Absolute and utter gibberish. I haven't read such a mish-mash of New Age/Hindu mystic/neo-Gnostic nonsense in a long time. patriarch, I'm afraid I have to agree with you. Whatever stew Chili is serving up here, it is definitely not Catholicism.

No it is not Catholic theology but just an argument for celibacy in the priesthood.
 
Upvote 0
To understand the doctrine of the Priesthood, it is necessary to understand first the celebration of the Eucharist, and the players involved in that great act of corporate worship.

First, we must recall that the Eucharistic assembly consists of the people of God united together through their Baptism, and anticipating together that perfect sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving that is coming at a later point in the service.

The conduct of the Eucharistic service is a corporate act, not a stage-act put on by choir and clergy (as in many Protestant Churches). While the Catholic liturgy has long been abused by choirmasters who insisted on liturgical settings that prohibited the people from participating, we are -- thankfully - beyond that for the most part in our day. The Celebrant-Presbyter is the presider of the Liturgical assembly, making prayers in the name of all the people. However, the people must participate in those prayers (thus the bidding, "Let US pray". . . not Let ME pray) through their personal throughts as well as their corporate AMEN! to the prayer as offered. We hear the readings, the Homily. . . but we are not called to be mere spectators, but to actively engage our minds and spirits in "wrapping ourselves" in the mysteries that are presented to us. (thus, from time to time, in small groups, it is highly appropriate for the Homilist to use the dialoge-homily form, allowing feedback and questioning, though I would maintain that this is not suitable for a Sunday or Holy Day Eucharist)

Then we come to the Creed. Again, we offer our faith up to God as a further sacrifice, because the Christian faith is a sacrifical faith. All who make sacrifice are Priests. Keep that in mind.

After the Creed, the role of the Celebrant-Presbyter takes on a new meaning. The role that the Celebrant-Presbyter (Or Bishop) plays is essentially that of the Elder, speaking on behalf of all of God's people assembled in that particular room of God's house. He is the one person in the room (unless there are several Presbyters!) who has been set apart in the Apostolic manner to serve in the office of Presbyter. We must remember that the term Priest for the second order of ministry is a latin corruption of the original greek. The greek word, Presbyter literally means elder, not Priest. Jerome and the Latin Church translated Presbyter as "sacredos" or "priest".

All in the congregation must participate fully, make responses, and pray for the needs expressed in the Eucharistic prayer, but it falls to the Celebrant-Presbyter to articulate that prayer to God by his special charism as a set-apart minister in Apostolic succession.

That each ministry has a specific role is attested to in the Acts of the Apostles, and the Presbyterate is one of the three Major Orders of the Church.

May God help our Protestant brothers and sisters to reclaim the heritage of Presbyters in Apostolic Succession (oh yea, and Bishops too!) so that the reunion we seek will come about! May we indeed all be one.

Father Rob
Anglican Catholic
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.