Originally posted by lambslove
What an incredibly lame explanation.
That part might have been a little lame...true. But what about the rest of it?
Upvote
0
Originally posted by lambslove
What an incredibly lame explanation.
Originally Posted by Christi
Yes, Tinker, and I am especially asking this question of Dave because it seems to contradict some of his past attitudes towards much smaller issues. And by the way, the fact that Jesus befriended sinners and prostitutes is one of the things I love about Him most.
Originally Posted by soulsisterclaire
There is a HUGE difference between being friends with a sinner, such as a prostitute, and being friends with someone that WORSHIPS Satan.
I would say that it is not a good idea to be friends with Satanists.
Two things here: one, even if it is a legend, the inverted cross of Peter is based on the legend that he was crucified upside-down, and not out of honor to Satan or any such other nonsense; and two, the 1st-century corpse that was disinterred from under St. Peter's Basilica in Rome that is believed to be that of Peter is missing the feet from the ankles down; this would fit in with the Roman practice of simply hacking the feet off the deceased victim to get it off the cross beam, rather than actually taking time to remove the body by pulling the spikes. Arms were tied to the horizontal beam as often as they were nailed, so there may have been no reason to hack off the hands.There is actually no historic evidence that Peter died on an inverted cross. Although Roman records indicated that he was crucified, they don't mention inverting the cross. It's legend and nothing more.
My question here would be, upon what evidence are you basing your assertion that the inverted cross is a Satanic symbol? Who said this, and where? Who told you this, or where did you read it? What are they basing their claim upon? Can you give me a reference than I can corroborate? If not, then the idea that an inverted cross is a Satanic symbol is just as much a legend as you assert that Peter's upside-down crucifixion is.Furthermore, I am astonished and offended that anyone who calls himself or herself a Christian would be trying so hard to get us to adopt and embrace a well-known symbol of satan, like the inverted cross!
Originally posted by lambslove
There is actually no historic evidence that Peter died on an inverted cross. Although Roman records indicated that he was crucified, they don't mention inverting the cross. It's legend and nothing more.
Concerning the manner of Peter's death, we possess a tradition--attested to by Tertullian at the end of the second century (see above) and by Origen (in Eusebius, "Hist. Eccl.", II, i)--that he suffered crucifixion. Origen says: "Peter was crucified at Rome with his head downwards, as he himself had desired to suffer".
The upright cross is practically a universal symbol of Christianity. I would think anyone wearing an inverted cross would be swamped with cute remarks: "Hey, fella, you need to stand on your head!" "Whoa, did you know your pin is upside down?" "Hey, you from Australia or something?"