C
cbk
Guest
Agreed. Time will tell.nephilimiyr said:I've read alot on this Lord Maitreya and he does fit the desrciption on the anti-christ. Time will tell...
Upvote
0
Agreed. Time will tell.nephilimiyr said:I've read alot on this Lord Maitreya and he does fit the desrciption on the anti-christ. Time will tell...
All this proves is that there are people in government that are freemasons and to which I have to say so what. What I'd like is if someone can prove to me Bush's ties to the freemason's. I've always heard that both Bush sr. and our curent president are born again christians so it is important to me that someone could clear this up for me.
Here is a video of a Freemason in Government Admitting it on Live TV (I think C-Span)
http://216.10.26.55/abq_council/mason-council.mpg
I'm a Roed-Larsen watcher, too. How fitting that this man gives voice to the quartet. Maybe he is the second beast and the quartet, the first?nephilimiyr said:I've read alot on this Lord Maitreya and he does fit the desrciption on the anti-christ. Time will tell...
Sorry but no that doesn't look familiar and I never heard of Roed-Larsen, who is he? Please explain!cbk said:I'm a Roed-Larsen watcher, too. How fitting that this man gives voice to the quartet. Maybe he is the second beast and the quartet, the first?
When I was younger, I saw a numeric system like the following:
a=6
b=12
c=18
d=24
e=30
f=36
g=42
h=48
i=54
j=60
k=66
l=72
m=78
n=84
o=90
p=96
q=102
r=108
s=114
t=120
u=126
v=132
w=138
x=144
y=150
z=156
Is this familiar to anyone?
He is the voice of the quartet. Creator of the Oslo Peace Accords. Works for the U.N. Was involved in a scandal that was predicted to ruin him, yet did not.nephilimiyr said:Sorry but no that doesn't look familiar and I never heard of Roed-Larsen, who is he? Please explain!
No. I just through in my two cents, that while you are watching Maitreya (of which I am glad that you are), I am watching Roed-Larsen. From this, you then asked me who Roed-Larsen was. Then I told you.nephilimiyr said:Ok cbk, thanks but why would me saying that I have read up on the Lord Maitreya make you think that I also have done the same with this Roed-Larsen?
Out of everything that I have read on Maitreya, this mans name has never came up, to my recollection. Although I do remember reading that Maitreya was there at the Oslo peace accords.
I shouldn't bother to reply to this, but this quote is so ridiculous that I actually have to say something! First, year 2000 is past and gone...second, I think you people lost it completely! You are now quoting obscure pseudoprophets to support your end of the world maniacal wishes? The more I read this forum, the more I realize that the church of Christ is in more trouble that I thought...jhessel said:St, John of the Cleft Rock, a 14th Century prophet, said, It is said that twenty centuries after the Incarnation of the Word, the Beast in its turn shall become man. About the year 2000 AD, Antichrist will reveal himself to the world.
Pericles said:I shouldn't bother to reply to this, but this quote is so ridiculous that I actually have to say something! First, year 2000 is past and gone...second, I think you people lost it completely! You are now quoting obscure pseudoprophets to support your end of the world maniacal wishes? The more I read this forum, the more I realize that the church of Christ is in more trouble that I thought...
How about the novel idea of reading your Bibles people?
How do you know the antichrist is not already here? Like I already said, you would know that if you read your Bible. About 2,000 years ago, John wrote:jhessel said:The article said that not me. And how do we know the anti-christ is not already here? People tend to think that he will be a hit the first time he appears. Maybe he already appeared (Maitreya for example) but hasnt become powerful yet.
Pericles said:How do you know the antichrist is not already here? Like I already said, you would know that if you read your Bible. About 2,000 years ago, John wrote:
"Children, it is the last hour; and just as you heard that antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have appeared; from this we know that it is the last hour" - 1 John 2:18
The article said it but since you used it to help prove your point I get the impression that you buy into it. Maybe he (THE anti-christ) isnt here and wont be until long after we are all gone. Nobody ever considers that possibility.The article said that not me. And how do we know the anti-christ is not already here? People tend to think that he will be a hit the first time he appears. Maybe he already appeared (Maitreya for example) but hasnt become powerful yet.
Yekcidmij said:The article said it but since you used it to help prove your point I get the impression that you buy into it. Maybe he (THE anti-christ) isnt here and wont be until long after we are all gone. Nobody ever considers that possibility.