It can probably be waived depending on how much of a stickler the priest is, but you could always give it the good college try to make sure he sees you're putting in a good-faith effort.
When the proponent of the statement lacks any cognizable background lending weight to the credibility of the statement. The second paragraph is likely indefensible; the third I just need statistics, but I always thought we gave foreign aid that did not consist chiefly of military presence.
Yeah. I mean even if he was acting in an official capacity even that wouldn't guarantee that a respondeat theory would hold. That detour vs frolic distinction muddies the waters a bit.
Something tells me the Bishop didn't get drunk by having a little too much of the Sacrament at Mass. Respondeat won't apply. But it is nice having someone here versed in legal matters for situations like this.
Maybe nobody called you out on this because it's not of huge consequence, but since you made this assertion twice, bro, her mom died. Her partner is still alive.
Or maybe I'm reading stuff really, really poorly at this hour.