• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Recent content by sfs

  1. sfs

    Evolution conflict and division

    No, let's first deal with the claim you made: "Macro Evolution is not something we discovered...we made it up - and then looked for evidence to support it." That's a positive claim, and for you to make it implies that you're familiar with possible evidence for macroevolution and have reasons to...
  2. sfs

    Evolution conflict and division

    I'm having difficulty thinking of a statement that would be further from the truth. Which of the many lines of evidence for common descent have you studied in the most depth? Endogenous retroviruses? Pseudogenes? Biogeography? Transition-to-transversion ratios? Might I ask what your expertise...
  3. sfs

    Evolution conflict and division

    I was aiming for irony there.
  4. sfs

    Evolution conflict and division

    One could argue that all ideas are made up, of course -- it's just that some made-up ideas turn out to accurate descriptions of reality. Evolution turns out to be one of them.
  5. sfs

    A Brilliant Perspective of Creation vs Evolution

    Hi ronlion, thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, lots of thing are generally known that turn out not to be true. Presumably, if the widespread belief is correct, it should be based on some available evidence. I can't find anything in Ian Hutchinson's piece that supports the idea that Maxwell...
  6. sfs

    Would the promotion of the First Absolute Law of Logic help establish the concept of God?

    A much better definition, and one that suggests no problem with evolution. Living things are imperfect replicators. Imperfect replicators change from generation to generation. Imperfect replicators that are subject to natural selection can become better at replicating. That's the essence of...
  7. sfs

    Would the promotion of the First Absolute Law of Logic help establish the concept of God?

    Okay, let's start there. First issue: that doesn't appear to be a standard statement of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, which basically says that everything has a cause. Second issue: even as normally stated, it's far from self-evident, as can be seen from the many arguments about it and...
  8. sfs

    Would the promotion of the First Absolute Law of Logic help establish the concept of God?

    I mean I don't know about any other created universes -- what they might be like. A variety of first principles have been proposed in different threads. Please state a first principle that you think prevents evolution of higher forms of life (whatever exactly they might be).
  9. sfs

    Icons of Evolution

    It is if you wish to promote his ideas on a discussion forum. Present an argument.
  10. sfs

    Icons of Evolution

    Well, someone who presumes to accuse health officials of criminal conduct without basis is presumptuous, yes. I'm pretty sure that in the conversation here, only one person studies infectious diseases for a living -- and it isn't you.
  11. sfs

    Would the promotion of the First Absolute Law of Logic help establish the concept of God?

    Sure. I'm not even sure what that means, how we could know the power required, or what units such a measurement would be made in. Again, sure. Maybe he did -- all we know is this universe. I don't consider myself in a position to tell God how he has to will things. Nor do I know what...
  12. sfs

    Would the promotion of the First Absolute Law of Logic help establish the concept of God?

    As a Christian, I believe in God the creator, maker of heaven and earth, of all that is seen and unseen. That is not a belief that I will provide evidence for. As a scientist, I have concluded that, at a minimum, all animal life on Earth descends from a single common ancestral population and...
  13. sfs

    Would the promotion of the First Absolute Law of Logic help establish the concept of God?

    I don't understand this as a response. I wasn't making a logical argument, so there's no logic to follow -- I was making a claim about the evidence. To back up a bit: your argument was that a consistent definition of 'species' was a necessary premise for evolutionary theory. That doesn't follow...
  14. sfs

    Would the promotion of the First Absolute Law of Logic help establish the concept of God?

    The division into particular named groups is a human invention. That cows are different from kumquats is observation about reality. Whether we gave them names or not, the would still be related by descent from a common ancestor -- that's what the evidence says, and that has nothing to do with...
  15. sfs

    Would the promotion of the First Absolute Law of Logic help establish the concept of God?

    That's not even remotely true. Evolutionary theory would do just fine if we had no definition of species at all. The evidence would still be overwhelming that living things have changed over time and that the change has occurred through random mutation filtered through natural selection.