Recent content by Proeliator

What I don't understand is the ones that don't want to be here to discuss it, they just come here to say how gross it is, etc etc. At least at GT people try to make points. Here they just straight talk trash, and don't even know half of what they are talking about. Lots of lies and...

You stand by the fact that Romans says "for all have sinned". The definition of all that you are using, would therefore include Christ, as it has already been established He came down and became man. My point is, that all is not an absolute in the style that you are using it. There obviously...

Right behind you.

Sorry, this has been used this way too many times for me not to say something now. The way that you, and some others, use the word "all", then Christ would have had to have sinned as well.

What in the world are you saying? That made no sense in the context of what I said.

Now, this is where you just make no sense. The point that is being made, is that you are using a product of the "proof" as "proof". The only reason that Christians can say that we know Scripture is true, because Scripture tells us so, is because we have faith. Does that make better sense to you...

How do you know that God actually exists? Its all about faith. If you can have faith that the Holy Spirit preserved Holy Scripture for hundreds of years through the RCC, then maybe you need to examine as to exactly why you think the RCC is in error. Is it your thoughts, or just what you have...

It's not hard to find anything backing up anything I said about the Reformers. Humanism was the fad of the times then. But I can't believe that your using the website for a business as a source. Perhaps you don't understand what a reputable source is?

Your misrepresentation of things astounds me sometimes. The Geneva did not come out until 1560, long after the 1st starts of the "Reformation". Perhaps you have an actual reputable source for your claim reagarding Erasmus? But for that 1200 years, well really until now but I'll use the 1200...

Actually, I was just responding to someone that brought the Crusades up. While they may not have been the best, most organized thing; obviously not all bad came of them. Sometimes the best of intentions, can have the worst of results. I think this fell somewhere in the middle.

Because there is only 1 "opinion" that matters. And that is God's Matthew 12:30

Okay, I'll just operate on the premise here that you just don't know Protestant church history. Martin Luther, was a priest, read Scripture in Latin. John Calvin, was a priest, read Scripture in Latin. Huldrych Zwingli, was a priest, read Scripture in Latin. Thats pretty much it for the...

You act as though that day and age was the same as this one. The education of the people was on a completely different level, to the point where the vast majority of the population couldn't have read the Scriptures anyway. So you want to go embrace heresy? Oh wait no, your saying that it may...

Its called The Sedlec Ossuary. I've seen pictures of it before. Here is a site with some good galleries and background on it. Very good stuff. http://www.ludd.luth.se/~silver_p/kutna.html

Oh, I know, I was just responding to the silliness of someone saying Jerome couldn't translate the same way. You can claim not to follow tradition all you want, but it's a guarantee that you do. Just your claiming to only ever need Scripture is a tradition in and of itself. As would be the way...