Recent content by Norbert L

Since the manipulation of a word that for thousands of years is where life begins becomes the major issue. I wrote the following below the first time you asked but now it's becoming like literally beating a dead horse, seeing a little movement and shouting it's alive: Can you use stronger words...

That's the problem, people just can't acknowledge that these things only point to one conclusion, abortion is a road to hell promoted by a selfishness which wants to frame its' denial as a noble virtuous cause. Lipstick on a pig. Since conception begins a human life, it's rather obvious that...

That's the problem, people just can't acknowledge that these things only point to one conclusion, abortion is a road to hell promoted by the selfishness who that wants to frame their denial as a noble cause. Lipstick on a pig. Since conception begins a human life, it's rather obvious that...

I did not mention at what point, only the location which is the womb. To redefine human life beginning at any point other than at conception as science objectively shows with unique DNA. Such a redefinition would be the ideology of deception and requires no painting necessary when it comes to...

I would suggest using normal common sense words like writing, absolute garbage instead. High minded words do not negate the prophetic wisdom of these common sense sayings along with their predictive powers. In fact the idea that life does not begin at conception is so high minded it is of no...

Infancy begins in the womb. Bonding with your baby during pregnancy Basically neither of those replies have any prophetic value so the phrase, running on empty is rather descriptive of those ideas. A person can see the numbers of abortions and show that rare but available is known to be false...

It's probably why the congresswoman wants to eliminate the word abortion from the abortion debate. It has always been about murdering unborn children in numbers that comparably make the genocide of the Jews look like a drop in the bucket. Staff Edit

Because it's exactly like denying the Holocaust but more, only tens if not hundreds of millions have been murdered. This decline argument is like saying only 5,999, 999 Jews were murdered, therefore the 6 million genocide of the Jews in WW2 should not be an issue. To believe that murdering a...

I heard that prediction and gave a link to confirm it. That's how I and many people thought it turn out to be like. No person wants to see their mother, sister or daughter denied essential health care. Ultimately it was the proverbial give an in take a mile approach that turned out to be true.

It was thought to be a prediction, just like another prophecy called, lies, damned lies and statistics, which you just used. The abortion rate going down is playing with numbers.

Sure there was. I'm surprised you are not aware of fairly recent history. How the abortion debate moved away from "safe, legal, and rare" Or do you think only the Bible has persons giving prophecies? Because that would be incorrect. Plenty of other people like making predictions about the future.

The prophecy surrounding abortion called rare but available was a false prophecy. The other prophecy turned out to be true. Give an inch take a mile.

The unique to electric car compared to fossil is the juice that drives it. Electric is excessively far more reliant on time than it is on miles driven. A person can find an old car that's been sitting for decades in a state of disrepair and drive it hundreds of miles home. With the right...

Odd. It wasn't working the first several attempts. Thanks [Edit] How will a court of law judge "from willful destruction by another person." Like in.. they were thinking about an abortion? Or should it be "from a willful act of murder by another person" seems more to the point?

Has anyone read this new law and is there a link to it? It would be the smart thing to do and formulate a response based on what it says rather than what any media outlet's hearsay.