Recent content by NobleMouse

I guess you're done then.

Every word is a made up word, that's how they exist... someone made them up. There is nothing with the definition of information as understood within the ID camp that contradicts other widely understood concepts of information, nor do I see it clashing in any way with Claude Shannon's...

The fact that I'm not born with the DNA sequence to deal with all the different bacteria I encounter (but my ancestors likely did encounter) seems like good evidence against evolution... we're not passing down alleged "new information from mutations" for future generations to deal with these...

Not my responsibility. You can go looking to me for answers that only others can provide, but that is your own foolishness. When do the bears come out on the tricycles with the little hats with tassels on this clown show where NobleMouse has to answer questions where it would make more logical...

Also, my worldview doesn't require that information increase/decrease. It assumes God created all the information needed at the time of creation. Your worldview is the on that requires new information to come from somewhere because it assumes all life has a universal ancestor. That is your...

Everybody else seems to understand what the ID scientists are bringing to light, not least of all those in attendance at the Royal Society meeting discussing the issues of evolution. Again, feel free to balk at this to your heart's content.

I do believe it takes information to specify a protein as a specific string of DNA bases. What I don't agree with is that somehow new information arose from the creation of an antibody. The information already in the DNA bases may not have been "expressed" in such a way to deal with the...

I believe that that the ID definition of information is reasonable/applicable here. As you know, the complexity of DNA is not just getting the linear sequencing correct, but that there is a 3-dimensional component, as well as a 4th dimension of time that is involved in DNA with gene regulatory...

Wow. Well I guess you summed up those nonsense ID scientists that everything they've been researching is based on meaningless jargon. Hey if you don't want to agree with their research and every other scientist that rejects evolution you are free to do so and for any reason you want. Ha ha...

I just happened to see this and assume it is addressed to me. I don't believe, and being very specific to humans and chimps, that humans/chimps are an example of 'evolution' within the same body plan. I reject that idea on the basis of what God's word says - where humans were made distinctly...

In the context I used the term information would be the same as it is viewed by the ID community. There is, of course, no simple one-sentence answer; however, the following article had a fairly good (what I suspect is an overview) explanation around what is "information": The Science Behind...

I thought I answered before, but to clarify - I do not believe it is new information when an antibody is created. To illustrate how I view this: If I were to take an exam over material I've been taught/learned, and I'm asked a question and give a response during the exam, have I created new...

I agree, but will say my opinion did not write what is written in the Bible and did not say the words that Jesus said - I just believe the words of the Bible to be true and what Jesus has said, to also be true.

Maybe if I express mathematically? New antibodies <> evolution of a new body plan. Can you recognize there is a major different between the creation of antibodies and creating a new body type using random mutations (which are almost always deleterious) + natural selection? I've been saying...

Spot on, as you quoted already from John 1:1, all things were made through Jesus. Jesus IS the word of God. Jesus said, "Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to...