Recent content by Mountainmike

Well I suppose it is progresss that finally you are engaging with evidence , which is why I reply instead of the usual straw man attacks against those whose opinions violate your beliefs. So pointing out your first straw man -at one level it doesn’t matter whether the samples were cardiac or...

you do love your false hoods. Have you ever actually studied logic? Clearly not. I don’t need medical qualifications to trust a consensus of well qualified scientists, medical doctors, pathologists et. in multiple instances, who did study the evidence! They deserve benefit of the doubt unless...

So as a person who has never studied the evidence in depth, and certainly not first hand , who is neither medically or scientifically qualified to assess any of it, you are happy to claim that a big group of scientists who HAVE done both all got it wrong in their core areas of expertise...

A pause on my travels caused me to look at this forum again. Alas in one post the above proves how pointless it is, to look on a science forum where the posters just want to promote their atheist beliefs devoid of a shred of scientific integrity,. Let us summarise his stated support of this...

As always you sure researched the hell out of that! eg String theory predicts time before the big bang, and there are many involved in string theory! eg many multiverse advocates think universes spawn others, so why should ours be first? . eg Penrose nobel laureate has written a lot on time...

You really do need to study some science to get the story straight before stating such things . So defeating illogic, I can give you a very long list of actual renowned physicists who disagree With you, Not that facts ever seem to worry you! So at least give us the benefit of labelling...

Who said I don’t? I clearly do. We are arguing how not whether! We need to separate what we believe from what there is evidence for. Atheists find that really hard to do. Atheist scientists are by far the worst at checking in their beliefs at the door and letting evidence rule. The entire...

Already stated. The samples are determined by pathology to be recently live tissue. So they are “ life” But They are not from a dead victim, ( for a variety of reasons) and are inexplicable by science ( for a variety of reasons) They appeared in real time in bread. So not progressive change in...

Your definiton is materially different from Darwin’s. You fail to refer to mechanism Or scope. You love that self serving but false dichotomy of natural/ supernatural. If it happens it is natural. Including Eucharistic so called miracles, The point I made was valid in theoretical chemistry...

The quotation is exactly as I stated. I gave references the first times. I cannot be bothered to repeat , or even look it up again. Knowing none of you take a blind bit of notice You would all rather pick nits than deal with the science. The heart is an organ, or hadn’t you noticed. But put...

You really do demonstrate how pointless it is to attempt a serious scientific discussion. I have actually read it! Have you? Most of the commenters here never read the background to their opinions, Some even have contempt for the few of us who are well read! I went back to the original I have...

It depends whose definition you use. I quoted Darwin’s from his theory. And ( recently ) Living cardiac tissue held in vitro clearly is “life” so pathologists tell us. Because Leucocytes do not survive for more than hours except in live tissue . This life did not come from progressive small...

On the wider issues, the ego clashes of some senior academics is breathtaking. It really does not helps science one bit. In the UK the antipathy between the Oxford and Imperial epidemiologists undoubtedly affected the projection, when both should work together for the common good they worked...

It depends who you speak to. So I throw it back at you. What do you mean by Evolution? A brief description without looking it up please. The answer is the name Evolution refers to a mush of ideas depending on context. There is no single theory, hypothesis or conjecture. For some it is common...

Far too deep for me. Faith is “ trust or confidence” . We all have a world view , or lens through which we see the universe. So confident are materialists , including here, against any phenomenon of theistic connection they refuse to even look at related evidence, It even Impacts testing. An...