Recent content by KenJackson

That's arrogant. It's like saying, "anybody that disagrees with me is ignorant." The video has a lot of talk, but it doesn't address the mechanism of evolution. That's the problem. That's why evolution can't do what you claim is proven. It's not because of what the Bible says, it's because...

No it didn't. It made mincemeat of the Jewish fable that Melchizedek was really Shem. That's the 2000 year old lie that purports to prove that the Lord Jesus is not a priest but an unlawful impostor. But alas, we're engaging in what the Apostle Paul encouraged us not to do. All my life I...

Obviously not. I said the video that started this thread convinced me that the pyramids were built around 2350 BC (see the diagram at 18:04), well after the tower of babel but before Serug, Abraham's great grandfather, was born. And how could Egypt be before the flood? Everyone on earth...

You're not helping the case for Christ when you engage in such wild superfluous arguments. Maybe this and maybe that. Maybe all kinds of things.

The pyramids really exist and are a conundrum, well worthy of serious discussion. But I think we've degenerated to the point of worthless sarcasm.

Didn't the Apostle Paul himself quote the Greek Septuagint? Nathan points out that that translation and the Samaritan Pentateuch were translated hundreds of years apart for groups that would have no reason to conspire together, yet they agree, as does the early copies of Josephus's histories...

I don't like it that you've actually driven me to agree with that barbarian over you. Yes, the Bible is inerrant. And in fact, modern science has vindicated the Bible in demonstrating that life could not have originated or developed by naturalistic materialistic processes (even if the truth...

By what principle of hermeneutics do you make the unmentioned pyramids miraculous?

The pyramids were not tombs. Real tombs are extremely ornate, lots of hieroglyphic histories on the walls, pillars and grand entrances and chambers. But the pyramids have nothing like that. They weren't filled with concrete. They're filled with blocks. How would the structure have been...

Are you just playing devil's advocate, like a troll, or proposing your actual opinion?

We're back to that.

Wrapped up in that explanation is a big problem that disproves it. Do you see it? If the need for grain silos wasn't made apparent until the first of seven years of plenty, then they would have had to have been built during the 7 years of plenty, preferably during the first 3. But various...

Author Christopher Dunn thinks the great pyramid at Giza was a power plant. Don't know. But they were not tombs, as is popularly thought. There were no mummies inside, no hieroglyphics, nothing ornate, no columns, no grand entrance. Do you have an idea?

There is evidence that they in fact were built. And the use of some technology is evident. (Is their existence evidence enough for you?) In fact there's evidence that incredible technology existed, since there are ancient statues in Egypt made of very hard rock that are so perfectly symmetric...

I've heard that from more than just SecHUD. Apparently someone floated it long ago and people who don't know anything about them assume it's a practical idea. But they would make terrible grain silos. And the technology to build them had probably been lost by the time of Joseph.