• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Recent content by HammOnWry

  1. HammOnWry

    Cavemen

    Of course God is real. Are you saying that you believe otherwise?
  2. HammOnWry

    Cavemen

    So you admit that you've actually witnessed biological evolution? It must be real, then, for you to have witnessed it.
  3. HammOnWry

    [open] Pregnant women - a place to chat! (7)

    Congratulations, and welcome!
  4. HammOnWry

    Darwin's Deadly Legacy

    Ugh. If there's one particularly dishonest tactic that creationists need to drop yesterday, it's this one.
  5. HammOnWry

    [open] Pregnant women - a place to chat! (7)

    :wave: Welcome, and congratulations!
  6. HammOnWry

    Bible verses thread.... (24)

    Psalms 136:3 Give thanks to the Lord of lords, for his steadfast love endures forever;
  7. HammOnWry

    Is Darwinism the Natural Enemy of Truth?

    You know what? I'm washing my hands of this thread. The OP has presented no evidence for their case, and has resorted to mincing other people's statements, taking quotes out of context, arguing semantics and just otherwise demonstrating a lack of intellectual honesty in this discussion. This...
  8. HammOnWry

    Is Darwinism the Natural Enemy of Truth?

    You're being dishonest by omitting part of his post, thereby misrepresenting his position. I'm calling you out on it. Yes, I can. If you want to discuss what he does or does not accept, though, why not take it up with him instead? If you want to believe that the diatoms are trillions of years...
  9. HammOnWry

    [open] Pregnant women - a place to chat! (7)

    :wave: I'm doing quite well, though with as low as I'm carrying this one, I'm eagerly looking forward to my delivery in January.
  10. HammOnWry

    Is Darwinism the Natural Enemy of Truth?

    <staff edit> He didn't say that he rejected radiocarbon dating entirely out of hand. He said that radiocarbon dating, when applied to diatoms, gives erroneous results -- which it does, due to the reservoir effect.
  11. HammOnWry

    Is Darwinism the Natural Enemy of Truth?

    Sigh. We just keep going around and around, don't we? Where in those two statements have you used the papers previously listed to actually support your argument? Elaborate in detail. Where in Mexico? Which excavation sites? Which dating methods were used, specifically? What sort of...
  12. HammOnWry

    Is Darwinism the Natural Enemy of Truth?

    See, what I'm asking is for you to explain, in your own words (that's the big thing here, in fact) how these papers make your case. As it is, you're simply asking me to take it on your authority that, buried in that stack of papers, is something which supports your argument. Of course, if...
  13. HammOnWry

    Is Darwinism the Natural Enemy of Truth?

    Wow. Every reliable dating method? That's quite a claim. Do you have a citation for that statement? I don't think anybody actually says this, aside from yourself. Do you have a citation for this? And these are not scientific arguments. Try again.
  14. HammOnWry

    Is Darwinism the Natural Enemy of Truth?

    I'm not. Can you point out where I'm disputing them? The given dates are outside of the range which the specific dating method can reliably produce. Therefore, they are suspect. Is there something about this which you don't understand? Please point out to me where I've done this. I don't. I...
  15. HammOnWry

    Is Darwinism the Natural Enemy of Truth?

    238U/235U, the decay of which are what creates the tracks, spontaneously decays at specific, known rates. Put simply, a sample which is older than a certain date will be too dense with tracks to produce any meaningful data, while the uranium in a sample which is too recent will not have had...
See more
Top Bottom