Hold on...you just made that number up didn't you?
Lemme get this straight. You're saying evolution is false because there are not enough fossils in existance for the time frames to be correct, yet you've just pulled this figure out of a hat.
Don't you see something wrong with that...
Yes, and YOU, (yes you) could be one of those lucky people!!!
For only $29.00, you could gain eternal life!
Just visit http://www.alexchiu.com/ and place your order now!
This? Again?
I remember creating a couple of threads asking the same question. Not surprisingly, no creationists were able to provide anything close to answering the question.
Except for that one person who was trying to change the definition of 'Creationism' in order to include the...
"If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands."
[/color]
And we don't need to, since the flood never happened.
Whats the point of speculating stuff like this if you're yet to demonstrate that a global flood is even possible?
I can.
The flood never happened, so craters could not have been caused by the flood.
You're missing the point.
What evidence is there that the 'sun stood still', or that something happened that made it appear to?
Its a number between 0 and 0.
Whats so appaling about the idea that something for which there is no evidence ever for, and an account that is untrustworthy at best, not actually occuring?
Afterall, its a card you like to play alot.
Well, yea of course. They've already, you know, done all the christian things like ending world poverty, now they just using the money left over to build 25 million dollar museums.
Wait...I think I've got it backwards...
[/size][/color][/font]