• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Recent content by DirkGeevink

  1. D

    Profound Challenges to Evolutionary Science

    You are right about the signal-to-noise ratio, but here is a collection of good threads on this board. Might be a good starting point! http://www.christianforums.com/t1161676-the-ce-thread-archive.html
  2. D

    What if?

    Actually, good players don't see a pattern. They just count the cards that have been drawn, thus slightly increasing the chances of predicting the next card correctly.
  3. D

    Is evolution stupid?

    This is for certain the most stupid thread I've read. So here's my little stupid contribution. Evolution is a non-intelligent proces, not stupid. Being stupid still implies intelligence, albeit little. There is no plan behind evolution. No smart plan, and no stupid plan. Just no plan...
  4. D

    Black Evolution.

    Yuck! *Hairy* apes? That's repulsive. You're right. Evolution is false. <img>
  5. D

    Sex Vacations?

    I think it's plate tectonics, and resulting earthquakes, that cause tsunami's. If you like to think if it is God's way of rooting out a few sinners, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people in the proces, have it your way.
  6. D

    Evolutionist "poof" theory

    I think evolution is a fact. If you backtrack it to the very beginning, a problem arises. Where did the first lifeform come from? I think there are two possibillities: 1. Abiogenesis 2. A deity created it To me, the first option is the most likely. But in either case, evolution remains a fact.
  7. D

    Scientists refute evolution, Non-creationist scientists

    Carico, Why is it you embrace this post about scientists refuting evolution? After all, as you stated before, scientists are fallible and imperfect, and are therefore not to be trusted? You are being inconsistant.
See more
Top Bottom