Recent content by Asimov

That's quite the condemnation. You have no idea how some Americans live. There is poverty everywhere, and people suffering everywhere. Don't demean their suffering. LOL, what a bunch of apologetic garbage. You're justifying the ownership of other humans because of economics? Hahahaha...

Yes, because all Christians must be bigots in order to be Christian. Don't justify your lack of reasoning power towards homosexuality with a bandwagon fallacy. You'll have to point out how homosexuality is damaging to the person, it seems to have slipped my mind...and reality. Political...

No, by law we are being forced to accept them as equal individuals just like everyone else, who are free to pursue life and happiness and live in liberty. It doesn't matter if you don't like their sexual tastes, some people don't like your religious tastes and they have to live with it as well...

There is nothing wrong with personally acting that way. It's when you try and turn it into a moral code and condemn other people for not acting the way that you do. Ridiculous.

LOL....probably the Puritans! My ex-girlfriend used to call it a va-j-j....:D

There's nothing wrong with helping people. There is something wrong with expecting it just because of the biological status of the individual. I would rather have someone help me because they choose to, not out of some misguided sense of duty.

This is Puritanical nonsense at its finest, people. I wouldn't dare mention a woman's "hoo-hoo" for fear that some of the Puritans here might go into apoplectic shock.

Homosexuals can produce children, just not in the "traditionally biological way". Homosexuals can also adopt children. I guess infertile couples shouldn't be given benefits either, eh? Bigotry at its finest. Sexism is fun! Bigotry is fun! Yes, because homosexuals are responsible for...

Yes, that's right. We should also remove the vote from women and reduce black people to nothing but slaves too. Oh yea, let's burn witches and kill natives who refuse to convert to Christianity. Those were the good ol' days. :doh:

Sterile and loveless? Hardly. Since when is not treating women like commodities to be bought creating a loveless nature? Only by your definition of what a good marriage is, which is entirely up to you and your spouse. It's not representative of what all marriages should be like nor is it...

We have our brains and faculties of reason to understand that in order for society to flourish, principles must be in place to allow for said flourishing.

What bunk! It was in those "chivalrous" days that people had no respect for women. Just because you aren't getting doors opened for you or having your hand kissed doesn't mean you're not being respected. It sickens me that women fought for equality and respect, to be treated like equals and...

I would hope so. No, it shouldn't be revived if it's dead. Chivalry is the equivalent to "a womans place is in the kitchen" mentality. A society of individuals is a society of individuals, and everyone shouldn't have to behave or conform to a particular concept of "etiquette" just because...

Pretty old thread, but the laws of physics are descriptive, not prescriptive. Why reality behaves the way it behaves in our universe is a huge question, not really one that I'm qualified to answer with any knowledge. Suffice it to say, I have no idea.

Bzzzt! Wrong.