Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sorry you are still confused. All I am asking is this: Who is the "Guiding Head" mentioned as being responsible for the video? What is the "Zion Colony" of which he is the guiding head?
Not really. It seems that you don't even know who made the video, let alone how trustworthy it is.
I’ve been busy with other things, but I wanted to reply anyway. First of all, I believe that the Bible is inspired by God. However, different books have different levels of inspiration. Some are just eye-witness accounts inspired to the point that the authors wrote truthfully. Joshua, Kings and Chronicles are books of this sort. There was no reason for God to explain His miracles, but He did want the events recorded accurately. Many writings are from the human perspective in relation to what God did for them. That is the point, not explaining the workings of the creation.
From what I could see, there was no context to the articles - nothing to show whether the Washington newspaper was publishing them as serious scientific articles or not. And saying that the person who made the video is called Odysee as well as the Guiding Head tells me nothing about his credentials or his trustworthiness.
No, you have misread what I wrote. I wrote that with the information available, we have no way of assessing their trustworthiness. I didn't say that they were all untrustworthy.
The thing that is hard to understand is that you reject creditable publications and videos of Christians for the last 400 years, and you accept information that doesn’t provide background information to allow the reader to check references and sources. It doesn’t make sense.
What about publications of Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, Sir Isaac Newton, and Hugh Ross, and many others that have been presented to you. Videos about astronomy are in the hundreds. You reject all of these and believe only those who support flat earth who are not astronomers or astronauts.
Don't you reject all evidence that the earth is a globe, whatever the source is, as being untrustworthy and untruthful? All products of an elaborate conspiracy to hide the truth and deceive?
So if you don’t like what they wrote you reject them without critical thinking. So you are still saying that they published false information. Here is Copernicus’s text in English: https://www.geo.utexas.edu/courses/...e Revolutionibus (On the Revolutions),_ 1.pdf
But if the source was NASA, you'd say something along the lines of: "You can't trust anything from NASA. Even their name is the Hebrew for 'deception'". To save any misunderstanding, I am not claiming that you used those exact words.
