Another look at the moon landing.

[Apple Sky]

Still not answering questions, I see.

No Comment.

 

[Strong in Him]

No Comment.

So you can't, or won't, answer the question "Did Charles Duke lie when he said that he walked on the moon"?
Understandable.
If you says, "yes", you are accusing another Christian of lying. If you say "no" you have to accept it - as indeed you once did.

 

[Apple Sky]

If you says, "yes", you are accusing another Christian of lying. If you say "no" you have to accept it - as indeed you once did.

So best to stay stum, what does that tell you ?

 

[ozso]

The truth will all come out one day & will be shouted from the highest roof tops.

It better not take too much longer. 90% of the people who were involved in it have died of old age.

 

[Phil G]

So best to stay stum, what does that tell you ?

It tells me that you know quite well that you accuse people in the wrong.

And I suspect you got into a little trouble by doing it…

There is no evidence that Charles Duke lied about his walk on the moon. None!!

He preaches the gospel of Christ. He intertwines his personal testimony into that teaching. That included walking on the moon. Neither you nor anyone else has a right to call him a liar for it.

 

[Strong in Him]

So best to stay stum, what does that tell you ?

That you don't want to look heartless by calling someone a liar - even though you think they are.

 

[Apple Sky]

It tells me that you know quite well that you accuse people in the wrong.

And I suspect you got into a little trouble by doing it…

So what's good for the goose isn't nesssarily good for the gander, think @prodromos.

 

[Phil G]

So what's good for the goose isn't nesssarily good for the gander, think @prodromos.

As I've said, Odle has been caught in a lie. There is no evidence that Charles Duke lied about his moon walk, only debunked accusations. So it is not a case of goose and gander. It is a case of you accusing somebody in the wrong and @prodromos relating an established fact.

 

[Apple Sky]

Buzz Aldrin & Bill Clinton Admit To Moon Landing Hoax - Youtube Deleting Buzz Confession Videos​

Buzz Aldrin & Bill Clinton Admit To Moon Landing Hoax - Youtube Deleting Buzz Confession Videos

Buzzard Aldrin

153news.net

 

[ozso]

Buzz Aldrin & Bill Clinton Admit To Moon Landing Hoax - Youtube Deleting Buzz Confession Videos​

Buzz Aldrin & Bill Clinton Admit To Moon Landing Hoax - Youtube Deleting Buzz Confession Videos

Buzzard Aldrin

153news.net

Here's the whole exchange without the cutaway. He obviously goes on to say there were actual manned moon landings in the past.

 

[prodromos]

And thus we see the dishonesty of the people producing the videos @Apple Sky keeps posting. They don't want people to learn the truth.

 

[ozso]

And thus we see the dishonesty of the people producing the videos @Apple Sky keeps posting. They don't want people to learn the truth.

I like the claim in the other video saying it keeps being removed by YouTube, but it took me a couple of seconds to find it in its entirety.

Basically what they're basing their case on is a bit of a gaff made by a man in his 90s.

 

[Phil G]

I like the claim in the other video saying it keeps being removed by YouTube, but it took me a couple of seconds to find it in its entirety.

Basically what they're basing their case on is a bit of a gaff made by a man in his 90s.

And as @Apple Sky knows full well, anyone can make a gaff….like saying a person other than Jesus is “the truth”, which, to my knowledge, she has done twice on CF.

If an astronaut had done that….well….

 

[David Lamb]

The truth will all come out one day & will be shouted from the highest roof tops.

And what difference will it make? When Jesus comes again, or when I die, my entry to heaven will be entirely dependent on my Saviour and Him dying for me and bearing my sins at Calvary. I could believe that the earth is a pyramid, a flat disc or s sphere, that nobody has visited the moon, or that some people have, but such beliefs would make not a jot of difference. If Jesus is my Saviour, I will be accepted into heaven. If He isn't, I won't. Praise God, He is!

 

[Apple Sky]

There is no evidence that Charles Duke lied about his walk on the moon. None!!

John 3:13.

 

[Strong in Him]

John 3:13.

Do me a favour, read a book about interpreting Scripture.

 

[Phil G]

John 3:13.

Charles Duke did not claim to ascend into heaven. He said he went to the moon and walked on it. That’s not heaven.

 

[ozso]

John 3:13.

The moon is heaven? Boy it sure doesn't fit the description John gave it in Revelation.

 

[David Lamb]

John 3:13.

John 3:13 says:

““No one has ascended to heaven but He who came down from heaven, that is, the Son of Man who is in heaven.” (Joh 3:13 NKJV)

Are you saying that when Jesus ascended, He landed on the moon? I agree that sometimes in the bible, "heaven" or "the heavens" is used for the sky, or the place where the moon, sun and stars are, for example:

“For the stars of heaven and their constellations Will not give their light; The sun will be darkened in its going forth, And the moon will not cause its light to shine.” (Isa 13:10 NKJV)

But heaven is also used as the place where God is. That is clearly the meaning in John 3:13, unless, as I say, you have the idea that Jesus ascended to the moon.

 

[Apple Sky]

Charles Duke did not claim to ascend into heaven. He said he went to the moon and walked on it. That’s not heaven.

It's part of them.