An individual's level of personal fitness has what to do with population level health and medical policy?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I generally don't look to people to take care of me, who have demonstrated that they have difficulty taking care of themselves.An individual's level of personal fitness has what to do with population level health and medical policy?
I'm formerly obese and lost over 20 years pounds since last October.An individual's level of personal fitness has what to do with population level health and medical policy?
Happy to hear Levine will be out soon!Former Trump WH COVID doc Deborah Birx ‘excited’ for questions at RFK Jr. confirmation hearing
The former White House coronavirus response coordinator on Sunday said she is looking forward to the Senate confirmation hearing of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who President-elect Trump tapped for his secretary of Health and Human Services, as a unique opportunity to have a transparent discussion on the health of Americans.
Dr. Deborah Birx, who served in Trump’s first administration, appeared on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” where she was asked at length about Kennedy potentially leading the agency. and his views on health issues such as vaccines.
“That’s why when he talks about transparency, I’m actually excited that in a Senate hearing he would bring forward his data and the questions that come from the senators would bring forth their data,” Birx said of Kennedy. “What I know for sure is he’s a very smart man who can bring his data and his evidence base forward.”
![]()
Former Trump WH COVID doc Deborah Birx ‘excited’ for questions at RFK Jr. confirmation hearing
Dr. Deborah Birx said she is looking forward to the Senate confirmation hearing of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who President-elect Trump tapped for his secretary of Health and Human Services.nypost.com
Its about time that someone has asked the most obvious question about all of this.How do you suppose he will overcome that hurdle? The GOP always touts fewer regulations not the many many more it would take to change the American diet.
Presenting evidence given to them by the manufacturers.FDA staffers play a pivotal role in drug approvals, presenting evidence to the agency's advisory panels and influencing or making approval decisions.
Or lack thereof; and the lobbyists have managed to get laws passed that your doctor doesn't even have to inform you of the side effects anymore; and laws have been placed to make it nearly impossible to sue the drug companies.Presenting evidence given to them by the manufacturers.
I would say that, this is precisely why RFKs position is problematic. Because RFK Jr is putting the focus on the regulatory agencies, when ultimately, the regulatory agencies are more so to some extent, utilized as pawns by larger figures such as lobbyists that are leading the agencies.Or lack thereof; and the lobbyists have managed to get laws passed that your doctor doesn't even have to inform you of the side effects anymore; and laws have been placed to make it nearly impossible to sue the drug companies.
How do we do that when they are protected by the agency that was created to protect us from them?Alternatively, we could consider an approach of blaming the companies that are actually making these chemicals and making the false evidence and making the business deals, the companies that are making the money off of the crime. These are the real problems. Not the half-baked regulatory agencies that are deregulated left and right, and have had their teeth removed long ago.
You give the regulatory agency more rules to follow for internal checks and legitimacy, and then you give that agency more teeth to fight those fights.How do we do that when they are protected by the agency that was created to protect us from them?
Also, and I just responded above, but a second consideration. Assigning coal lobbyists to the head of the EPA for example, is not a viable solution either. If you're concerned about agencies protecting industries, then the president appointing industry sympathetic lawyers to administer these agencies, obviously is just going to have the opposite effect.How do we do that when they are protected by the agency that was created to protect us from them?