Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
When the NT was canonized as Scripture, it was canonized as the word of God just as the OT Scriptures are the word of GodThat isn't about the whole bible, it is about the Old Testament including the Deuterocanon.
Is this the first time you've ever heard of Scripture as the word of God?Word (word) of God is spoke, scripture (bible) is written.
Additionally, when the NT mentions scripture, it is not referring to the Bible.Word (word) of God is spoke, scripture (bible) is written.
That’s what I thought. Circular.Because God speaking through the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church says so.
When the NT mentions Scripture, it is referring to the Scriptures in existence at the time; i.e., the OT.Additionally, when the NT mentions scripture, it is not referring to the Bible.
This is a poor proof of the Divine inspiration of Hebrews, but if that's all you got, run with it.Not to mention, Peter placed Paul's writings on the same level of authority as the God-breathed (2 Tim 3:16) writings of the OT (2 Pe 3:16).
The Tanakh. But I give you partial creditWhen the NT mentions Scripture, it is referring to the Scriptures in existence at the time; i.e., the OT.
This post doesn't offer anything new; it merely echoes the content of previous posts. Additionally, the term "word of God" should not be confused with scripture.When the NT was canonized as Scripture, it was canonized as the word of God just as the OT Scriptures are the word of God
Not to mention, Peter placed Paul's writings on the same level of authority as the God-breathed (2 Tim 3:16) writings of the OT (2 Pe 3:16).
Is this the first time you've ever heard of Scripture as the word of God?
Surely not!
The Catholic church does not consider all Scripture, including Hebrews, to be God-breathed (2 Tim 3:16)?This is a poor proof of the Divine inspiration of Hebrews, but if that's all you got, run with it.
Not because of 2 Peter, but then again you're reaching. I understandThe Catholic church does not consider all Scripture, including Hebrews, to be God-breathed (2 Tim 3:16)?
And they canonized Hebrews?
You might take that up with Jesus who referred to "the word of God" as "the Scripture."This post doesn't offer anything new; it merely echoes the content of previous posts. Additionally,
the term "word of God" should not be confused with scripture.
Except that you cannot substantiate it.True truth is true no matter what shape it is.
Of course not, But do you?Do you?
Im beginning to believe that you and many on this forum have no idea what a strawman is. Hint, it's not something to say when you're out of bulletsStrawman. . .
You sounded (to me) like you didn't want @Clare73 's input, as though she had no right to speak her mind here, suggesting (or so it seemed to me) that she should do so on her own thread.Decide for yourself what it is. if you are keen on a debate I am confident that you can create one.
Well, I see we have nothing further to talk about, since we don't hold the truth in common. The RCC is without anchor.That isn't about the whole bible, it is about the Old Testament including the Deuterocanon.
Try reading what Jesus said with more care, it is the spoken word of God that came to "them" and it is the scriptures that record it.You might take that up with Jesus who referred to "the word of God" as "the Scripture."
"If he called them 'gods' (Ps 82:6) to whom the word of God came--and the Scripture cannot be broken--what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world?"
No offense. . .but are you Biblically informed enough to have a Biblical discussion?
I do not need to any more than I'd need to substantiate that there will be a sunrise in the future.Except that you cannot substantiate it.