I watched a YouTube series about the formation of the various denominations --
UsefulCharts: Christian Denominations Family Tree. Very interesting, albeit long. If you have the time, I found it very educational.
The lesson I indirectly drew from his presentation is that there appears to be the following cycle:
- First, there are some reformers that dissatisfied with the status quo ...
- So they try to institute change within their organization.
- The powers-that-be often resist change, and thus ...
- the reformers break away and set up a new organization.
- But then this new organization seems to crystalize into a new inflexible system until ...
- the cycle repeats.
I think you raised at least 2 points:
- Do Catholics have doctrines that you and others have disagree with?
- Do Catholics have flexibility, ability, and willingness to change in response to doctrinal problems as they come to light?
Regarding point #2, I would argue that this is not a particularly Catholic issue. Every denomination -- including my own -- has this problem. I am SDA, which has a distributed governance type organization. Pastors are paid by the organization, and are thus answerable to that organization. So what will happen if a pastor has a doctrinal difference of opinion? I don't know all the details, and I'm sure there is due process. But ultimately a church is not going to pay for someone to teach things that are outside the accepted standard. I suspect this is true in many denominations. I think that many Baptist churches are congregational (pastor is answerable only to a board of elders), which may avoid some of these problems. Again, though, I don't know the particulars.
One particular issue my denomination has faced has been the ordination of female pastors. Church conferences on the west coast of the US have gone forward with the practice. But many more conservative conferences in Latin America do not feel this is right. There have been meetings between the conferences, but I don't think a unified resolution has come out yet. I try to stay away from such politics. This particular issue is felt to not be sufficient to cause a split in the way that the United Methodist church recently split. So perhaps my denomination is doing an OK job of trying to be flexible, and meet people's needs, but not tear itself apart.
A deeper questions would be, how SHOULD these things be sorted out? In the first recorded meeting of the Christian church, at the Council of Jerusalem, they gathered and debated the issue of circumcision etc. Ultimately a resolution was established, though perhaps all did not agree. This seems like a reasonable solution. And it is all these accumulated synods that make up Catholic traditional teaching. Much of it good, but I feel not all.