Charlie Kirk om Kamala Harris' VP pick

[Super Kal]

As usual, Charlie Kirk does an amazing job at highlighting everything that Tim Walz has done, and everything that Tim Walz is... and everything that Tim Walz has done here in Minnesota has been disastrous, catastrophic, and has been a blunder for the state of Minnesota.

Charlie Kirk: Everything You Need to Know About Kamala's Minnesota Marxist VP

 

[Vambram]

Charlie Kirk's opinions, analysis, and facts that he publishes on his podcasts and radio shows are always spot on from a very conservative perspective.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Charlie Kirk's opinions, analysis, and facts that he publishes on his podcasts and radio shows are always spot on from a very conservative perspective.

Always? Why do conservatives always have to bring race into it?

Charlie Kirk's 'Black Pilot' Remark Sparks Fury​

"If I see a Black pilot, I'm gonna be like 'boy, I hope he is qualified,'" the activist and host of the The Charlie Kirk Show said.

 

[Vambram]

Always? Why do conservatives always have to bring race into it?

Charlie Kirk's 'Black Pilot' Remark Sparks Fury​

"If I see a Black pilot, I'm gonna be like 'boy, I hope he is qualified,'" the activist and host of the The Charlie Kirk Show said.

He made that comment as he was talking about DEI policies in the hiring practices of some of the airlines in the USA. Do you agree that pilots ought to be hired based upon their merits instead of also factoring in stuff from the DEI agenda?
Most Conservatives whom I know will not hire someone based upon Diversity Equity, and Inclusion. Instead, hiring and promoting people should only be done on the basis of merit.

 

[Fantine]

Minnesotans would respectfully disagree, especially those with formerly hungry children, new parents who can get paid leave, family caregivers, veterans,the working class, etc.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Always? Why do conservatives always have to bring race into it?

Charlie Kirk's 'Black Pilot' Remark Sparks Fury​

"If I see a Black pilot, I'm gonna be like 'boy, I hope he is qualified,'" the activist and host of the The Charlie Kirk Show said.

I don't know about "conservatives", but Charlie Kirk is a somewhat racist XNationalist. That's been clear for years. I certainly don't expect better from him.

 

[Vambram]

Minnesotans would respectfully disagree, especially those with formerly hungry children, new parents who can get paid leave, family caregivers, veterans,the working class, etc.

Stuff like this is also very much available for people in the red state where I live.

 

[essentialsaltes]

He made that comment as he was talking about DEI policies in the hiring practices of some of the airlines in the USA. Do you agree that pilots ought to be hired based upon their merits instead of also factoring in stuff from the DEI agenda?

All jobs have qualifications that need to be met, and those for commercial pilots are quite strict. If private companies also have DEI considerations, I have no issue with that.

 

[Servus]

I don't know about "conservatives", but Charlie Kirk is a somewhat racist XNationalist. That's been clear for years. I certainly don't expect better from him.

Post something he's said that's racist.

 

[Servus]

All jobs have qualifications that need to be met, and those for commercial pilots are quite strict. If private companies also have DEI considerations, I have no issue with that.

It's pretty sensible to not want the worst pilot being hired because their minority status.

 

[Servus]

As usual, Charlie Kirk does an amazing job at highlighting everything that Tim Walz has done, and everything that Tim Walz is... and everything that Tim Walz has done here in Minnesota has been disastrous, catastrophic, and has been a blunder for the state of Minnesota.

Charlie Kirk: Everything You Need to Know About Kamala's Minnesota Marxist VP

One thing I knew for sure is she wasn't going to pick Josh Shapiro given the left's attitude towards Jews.

 

[KCfromNC]

Charlie Kirk's opinions, analysis, and facts that he publishes on his podcasts and radio shows are always spot on from a very conservative perspective.

I'm nominating "spot on from a very conservative perspective" as 2024's "alternative facts".

 

[Postvieww]

Always? Why do conservatives always have to bring race into it?

Charlie Kirk's 'Black Pilot' Remark Sparks Fury​

"If I see a Black pilot, I'm gonna be like 'boy, I hope he is qualified,'" the activist and host of the The Charlie Kirk Show said.

Why do liberals Always attack and divert? Why not actually deal with facts Kirk presented? Would that be because it is much easier to play the race card ignore the facts and move on! Walz’s record is a dismal liberal train wreck . Calling those that bring forth those facts racist is a tired worn out tactic.

 

[Postvieww]

I don't know about "conservatives", but Charlie Kirk is a somewhat racist XNationalist. That's been clear for years. I certainly don't expect better from him.

Attack and divert. Liberal tactic in living color. Why not refute the actual facts Kirk presented if you can?

 

[Postvieww]

I'm nominating "spot on from a very conservative perspective" as 2024's "alternative facts".

Attack and divert. Where is substantive rebuttal of Kirk?

 

[Postvieww]

Minnesotans would respectfully disagree, especially those with formerly hungry children, new parents who can get paid leave, family caregivers, veterans,the working class, etc.

You left out now young boys have access to tampons in their restrooms. How very caring and understanding of the young boys needs.

 

[Servus]

Always? Why do conservatives always have to bring race into it?

Charlie Kirk's 'Black Pilot' Remark Sparks Fury​

"If I see a Black pilot, I'm gonna be like 'boy, I hope he is qualified,'" the activist and host of the The Charlie Kirk Show said.

Yeah because he's going to have to wonder if they hired the pilot based on his skin color rather than his proficiency.

 

[Larniavc]

always spot on from a very conservative perspective.

Even when he didn't understand what bananas are? Is that a spot on conservative perspectives? Or is it an example of a person confidently opining on a topic that had not even remedial knowledge thereof?

 

[KCfromNC]

Attack and divert. Liberal tactic in living color.

Did I hit a nerve?

Why not refute the actual facts Kirk presented if you can?

You mean the like the fact from the OP that literally "everything that Tim Walz has done here in Minnesota has been disastrous, catastrophic, and has been a blunder for the state of Minnesota"? If that's the level of discourse we're dealing with, I think mild amusement and ignoring it is the proper response.

 

[Postvieww]

Did I hit a nerve?

No! I just pointed the obvious attack and divert. No substance.?