Walz has said outright that he was never in combat. Nothing in his record says he was in combat. Any soldier can look at the decorations on his chest and see that he was never in combat, so that's not something he'd dare even lie about.Really! Can we deal with actual facts here. Walz also never carried a gun in combat unless there was some conflict in Italy that didn’t make the news. The campaign is well ahead of some of the posters on this thread who are defending this stolen valor. They are now trying to figure out how to clean up this mess. Diversion is not an effective tactic in covering Walz’s embellishments.
I'm a Vietnam Era veteran. Notice, I said "Vietnam Era veteran," not "Vietnam veteran." I did my Vietnam time in Thailand, which is where the SR-71 operated from for Vietnam missions. That's the kind of distinction we make.
Upvote
0