- Oct 10, 2011
- 24,717
- 5,558
- 46
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Celibate
This thread is evidence as to why He still waits.
God Bless.
God Bless.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's a nonanswer to make a politician blush.From a western rationalist standpoint this might seem reasonable, but everything is more connected than we might imagine.
I don't think God is waiting. Not in waiting to punish people like its a walk down the corridore to the principles office to be punished. I think the punishment if you can call it that is happening all the time as a natural consequence of choice.And if so what's the wait for ? God could just snap his mighty fingers and boom all the evil people are erased out of existence I don't know why God simply won't do this.
Are there things that an omnipotent being can't do? I don't care how "connected" something is, if your god can't do something, your god is not omnipotent.From a western rationalist standpoint this might seem reasonable, but everything is more connected than we might imagine.
And if so what's the wait for ? God could just snap his mighty fingers and boom all the evil people are erased out of existence I don't know why God simply won't do this.
Are there things that an omnipotent being can't do? I don't care how "connected" something is, if your god can't do something, your god is not omnipotent.
Words have meaning.
If an omnipotent God creates a rule, but then breaks it, what then of said omnipotence?Are there things that an omnipotent being can't do? I don't care how "connected" something is, if your god can't do something, your god is not omnipotent.
Words have meaning.
This doesn't address the pointIf an omnipotent God creates a rule, but then breaks it, what then of said omnipotence?
It does however, just not according to your logical premise.This doesn't address the point
So many false ideas are daily published, taught by parents to children , by pastors and preachers and teachers to students, to the public by tens of thousands of vectors (sources).....And if so what's the wait for ? God could just snap his mighty fingers and boom all the evil people are erased out of existence I don't know why God simply won't do this.
In the most extreme example, millions of relatively innocent people would have to die in a nuclear war and every plant and living thing will be destroyed and irradiated, all because of a relative very few wicked powerful people and they have fooled the gullible to be dumb enough to blindly support them. But hey, it doesn't matter how tragic the event is or how many people are lost or tormented, as long as it's for God's bigger plan, right?I don't think God is waiting. Not in waiting to punish people like its a walk down the corridore to the principles office to be punished. I think the punishment if you can call it that is happening all the time as a natural consequence of choice.
"Can" is different from "will".Are there things that an omnipotent being can't do? I don't care how "connected" something is, if your god can't do something, your god is not omnipotent.
Words have meaning.
Yup. I never said otherwise. An omnipotent certainly could will to not do something. But if you read my exchange with my interlocutor, the argument was about "can"."Can" is different from "will".
I lean towards #1. It is the simplest answer.
Here is something I read the other day. Points for anybody who can identify their author:
I have never felt the need for religious faith to help me comprehend and deal with the world. However, I understand that for many people religion provides a moral anchor and seems essential. And, in my view, the private faith of anyone is nobody’s business except that of the individual concerned. I have no issue with religion when it occupies this private space and doesn’t seek to impose its values on others. But when religion becomes politicised, even weaponised, then it’s everybody’s business, because of its capacity for harm.When people call for divine intervention in the lives of the non-religious it strikes me as a form of politicising or weaponising religion, though the writer was more concerned about direct action by religious zealots.
I think perhaps calling for the death of 'evil' people is a nod towards temporal justice rather than divine.
Would you like to know? If you don't mind I will wait for some guesses before I make the revelation (no, not Revelation!)Good quote. I don't know its origin, but I agree fully with the message. Here are two of my favorite quotes that are somewhat similar:
“Religion is based primarily upon fear. It is partly the terror of the unknown and partly as the wish to feel that you have a kind of elder brother who will stand by you in all your troubles and disputes. Fear of the mysterious, fear of defeat, fear of death. Fear is the parent of cruelty, and therefore it is no wonder if cruelty and religion have gone hand in hand.
---Bertrand Russell
Men never do evil as cheerfully and as completely as when they do it from religious conviction.
---Blaise Pascal (a lifelong Catholic)
It probably won't get to that but innocent people do suffer and die.In the most extreme example, millions of relatively innocent people would have to die in a nuclear war and every plant and living thing will be destroyed and irradiated, all because of a relative very few wicked powerful people and they have fooled the gullible to be dumb enough to blindly support them. But hey, it doesn't matter how tragic the event is or how many people are lost or tormented, as long as it's for God's bigger plan, right?