Project 2025 is NOT the Trump plan - do not get mislead

[Always in His Presence]

Looks like a peaceful continuation of the float down the river of denial lol. They love that river. It has no dangerous rapids. They even warn US not to be misled...how rich is that?

The river is filled with talking points from legacy media outlets who believe if they say something enough times - it makes it factually correct.

284 post - not one factual proof. Just innuendo based from a position of animosity

 

[Brihaha]

The river is filled with talking points from legacy media outlets who believe if they say something enough times - it makes it factually correct.

284 post - not one factual proof. Just innuendo based from a position of animosity

Na, it's based on a fixed position on the bank of reality my friend. Deny deny deny. It's one of those 5 D words Mr Cohn taught Donald long ago, and he's passed the lesson on to his minions.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Na, it's based on a fixed position on the bank of reality my friend. Deny deny deny. It's one of those 5 D words Mr Cohn taught Donald long ago, and he's passed the lesson on to his minions.

Ah, legacy media is indeed powerful

Questions:

1 was there violence from the left during Trumps presidency?

2. Was there election denial after his first win?

 

[wing2000]

Ah, legacy media is indeed powerful

Questions:

1 was there violence from the left during Trumps presidency?

2. Was there election denial after his first win?

sounds like topics for another thread : )

 

[Brihaha]

Ah, legacy media is indeed powerful

Questions:

1 was there violence from the left during Trumps presidency?

2. Was there election denial after his first win?

Yet y'all are voting for more violence.
And that election is now arguably seen as being illegitimate. With election interference from Donald Trump, the National Enquirer and the Russians. Why do I answer your queries without reciprocation? Could you voice a few reasons for choosing Mr Trump as president again, please? I'm trying to figure out how the pros could possibly outweigh the cons of voting for this Trump feller. I know that is impossible to demonstrate but I'd enjoy it if someone gave it a go .

 

[Always in His Presence]

Yet y'all are voting for more violence.

Most people do not react well to threats - if the left wants to continue violent actions - so be it. Play stupid games - get stupid prizes.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Could you voice a few reasons for choosing Mr Trump as president again, please? I'm trying to figure out how the pros could possibly outweigh the cons of voting for this Trump feller. I know that is impossible to demonstrate but I'd enjoy it if someone gave it a go .

sounds like the topic of another thread.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Now can we return to the topic of the thread and the fact Project 2025 is not endorsed by Trump or the RNC - but it is the left's latest boogeyman

 

[JustOneWay]

Now can we return to the topic of the thread and the fact Project 2025 is not endorsed by Trump or the RNC - but it is the left's latest boogeyman

Good. then we won't expect Trump to follow any of the ridiculous conservative malarkey the Heritage folks want to do.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Good. then we won't expect Trump to follow any of the ridiculous conservative malarkey the Heritage folks want to do.

Not only that I don't believe you personally should vote for him.

 

[Always in His Presence]

 

[childeye 2]

Interesting contradiction, he knows nothing about Project 2025, so how could he think some of their proposals are absolutely ridiculous?

Any reasoning based on a falsehood ends in a contradiction. People who lie so as to deceive will ultimately end up claiming two contrary positions.

 

[Pommer]

View attachment 351523

Has Trump articulated any policies that his Administration would pursue?

 

[Brihaha]

Most people do not react well to threats - if the left wants to continue violent actions - so be it. Play stupid games - get stupid prizes.

Exactly right. Donald Trump has proven time and again he is a threat to our American institutions. He literally tried to use his gullibles to overturn his election loss with violence. So why vote for the guy who inspires more violence? Unless the violence is the motivating factor...I'm guessing the stupid prize bit can be a metaphor for the violence people crave. When voting for Mr Trump is a stupid game. Stupid is definitely as stupid does. It's all FOR the stupid violence and retribution. That's what it seems like. I hate having a pessimistic outlook on my fellow Americans but these actions speak much louder than any of the lies or rhetoric I hear. And sadly, many of these Trump voters claiming to be Christians are also all in for the violence and retribution. Their bibles are dusty from sitting alone in the same spot for too long. My bible teaches something vastly different.

 

[FenderTL5]

Now can we return to the topic of the thread and the fact Project 2025 is not endorsed by Trump or the RNC - but it is the left's latest boogeyman

You can't blame "the left" for the Heritage Foundation and Project 2025.
Both are firmly entrenched in the conservative right. P2025 is a boogeyman of the conservative/right's own making.

 

[childeye 2]

You can't blame "the left" for the Heritage Foundation and Project 2025.
Both are firmly entrenched in the conservative right. P2025 is a boogeyman of the conservative/right's own making.

Any reasoning based on a falsehood ends in a contradiction. It's unreasonable to claim P2025 is a bad thing while also blaming the Democrats for saying it's a bad thing.

 

[Bradskii]

The river is filled with talking points from legacy media outlets who believe if they say something enough times - it makes it factually correct.

284 post - not one factual proof. Just innuendo based from a position of animosity

Except a direct quote from Trump. How does that not register with you? I'm puzzled...

 

[FenderTL5]

..it is extremely common for both conservative AND liberal think-tanks to offer up agendas, ideas, and details. However, that NEVER Means that the POTUS or any other politician will do everything... or even anything just like they are advised to do so.

Yet, If history is any indicator Trump and the GOP will adopt a significant portion of the Heritage Foundation's policy recommendations.
They have done it in the past and there's no reason to believe that will suddenly change.

I am much more concerned about lobbyists and big money donors than I am about liberal and conservative think-tanks.

Then why on God's green earth do you support the current incarnation of the GOP (either major party for that matter)?
Lobbyists, like the Heritage Foundation and ALEC, are leading them around by the nose. (see link above)

of "334 unique policy recommendations. Analysis completed by Heritage determined that 64 percent of the policy prescriptions were included in Trump’s budget, implemented through regulatory guidance, or under consideration for action in accordance with The Heritage Foundation’s original proposals."

 

[Rajni]

“I know nothing about Project 2025,” Trump posted on his social media website. “I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”​

It's interesting how he seems able to disagree with aspects of something he said he knows nothing about.



-

 

[Hans Blaster]

Has Trump articulated any policies that his Administration would pursue?

He generally leaves that to his allies and surrogates, like Heritage and their "2025 project".