I suggest going to the Project 2025 site and reading the actual document vs. going to sites like Wikipedia to get a summary.
why?
Because Wikipedia makes claims about what the Project says without even referencing the original documents. On Climate Change, for instance, it states:
"Project 2025 advises a future Republican president to go further than merely nullifying President Biden's executive orders on climate change.
[67] It proposes abandoning strategies for reducing
greenhouse gas emissions responsible for
climate change, including by repealing regulations that curb emissions, downsizing the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and abolishing the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which the project calls "one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry."
[36][126][127][128]"
see all of those notations? None of them come from the original document or site --they are all from far-left, partisan magazines, blogs, and websites (Guardian UK, Politico opinion pieces, etc)
Now I am sure I disagree with much of Project 2025, but I would point out that
1. Probably not a single left-winger on this site has read the original document or has even been to the site
2. The Heritage Foundation does not create the GOP platform for 2024
3. This document is basically a "wish-list" and contains provisions and objectives which will never be enacted. Even things that make it into the GOP platform will not be enacted.
Remember the DNC platform for 2020? That called for the creation of a "Universal Healthcare System" through a Public Option --that never happened, and there wasn't even an attempt to do that by Biden or anyone else.