- May 10, 2018
- 5,165
- 733
- 64
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Skeptic
- Marital Status
- Private
... If He left behind "sufficient" evidence for His resurrection, or not?
I'd wager that even a Christian could argue both "yes" or "no".
What's your take? (Yes or no), just for starters...?
(i.e.)
{No}.... His objective was to atone for human sin, and allow for humans to be saved. He did not care if anyone actually saw such a transaction or not. And hence, why He instead requires pure faith, as Hebrews 11:1 states...
{Yes}.... He did leave behind "sufficient" evidence, and the ones whom say He did not are (fill-in-da-blank)....
The atheist might want to point out how... Is it reasonable to ask that someone take such a claim, on pure faith and 'eyewitness' evidence, when the stakes are so high?.?.?
Not sure where this thread will go...?
I'd wager that even a Christian could argue both "yes" or "no".
What's your take? (Yes or no), just for starters...?
(i.e.)
{No}.... His objective was to atone for human sin, and allow for humans to be saved. He did not care if anyone actually saw such a transaction or not. And hence, why He instead requires pure faith, as Hebrews 11:1 states...
{Yes}.... He did leave behind "sufficient" evidence, and the ones whom say He did not are (fill-in-da-blank)....
The atheist might want to point out how... Is it reasonable to ask that someone take such a claim, on pure faith and 'eyewitness' evidence, when the stakes are so high?.?.?
Not sure where this thread will go...?
Last edited: