• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Is the Seventh Day Adventist Church orthodox

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,776
6,156
Visit site
✟1,089,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No one has ever argued here that there are not other laws in the old covenant that are applicable under the new covenant (e.g clean and unclean food laws etc).

So why are food laws "moral"?
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,636
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,349.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I quoted the part I am interested in, as part of a conversation you said you were interested in.

Indeed and not what we were discussing in the content and context of the post and the scriptures provided to you in regards to Matthew 5, God's 10 commandments and Gods' law of love linked in Matthew 22:36-40. You were trying to make out the two great commandments of love quoted by Jesus are new commandments when they are not and seeking to make an argument that no one is making that there are more laws in the bible beside the 10 commandments that no one was disagreeing with or arguing about.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,636
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,349.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You edited to add material, so I will reply to that:
Not really. I completed my post and edits before you had even posted.
LoveGodsWord wrote: As posted earlier if you do not want to discuss the content of my posts and the scriptures I have provided you do not have to.
Your response
Then why even mention it?
Because I was responding to a post you wrote earlier in regards to Matthew 5 at the beginning of the discussion which I wanted to discuss with you.
Because talking about the content of your posts in full is definitely the best way to figure out why I don't keep the Sabbath? Somehow I doubt that will work. So I will just quote the part I am interested in, and you can participate to the degree you want.
A discussion goes two ways. Like you said earlier you do not get to choose what is discussed. Of course you are free to discuss what you like but a discussion normally goes two ways I have always thought and I was only discussing a post you had already posted which was yours in regards to Matthew 5
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,636
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,349.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
So why are food laws "moral"?
All of God's laws have an aspect right doing therefore moral depending on what covenant is being discussed *Psalms 119:172 to those who have a knowledge of the truth of God's Word (James 4:7; Acts of the Apostles 17:30-31). Our dietary laws are laws of right doing that govern health.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,776
6,156
Visit site
✟1,089,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You were trying to make out the two great commandments of love quoted by Jesus are new commandments when they are not

I did not allege that at all. I said it is ironic that you talk about the ten being the moral law, and then mention the two, when they are not from the ten but are from the law.

But now that you admit others from the law besides the ten are still part of the new covenant, no problem. That was my point. Now I am just trying to figure out how you decide.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,636
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,349.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I did not allege that at all. I said it is ironic that you talk about the ten being the moral law, and then mention the two, when they are not from the ten but are from the law.
If you read my second post on Matthew 22:36-40 from post # 835 linked and the scriptures provided to you there you would see that the ten and two are not separated. Love is expressed through obedience to God's 10 commandments not by breaking them. I did not admit or deny anything. I have never made the argument that there are not other laws beside the 10 commandments. That was simply a distraction to what I was posting in the scriptures to you.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,776
6,156
Visit site
✟1,089,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
All of God's laws have an aspect right doing therefore moral depending on what covenant is being discussed *Psalms 119:172 to those who have a knowledge of the truth of God's Word (James 4:7; Acts of the Apostles 17:30-31). Our dietary laws are laws of right doing that govern health.

Did the law present them as health?
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,636
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,349.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Pretty sure it stated it as holiness.
That would not be correct.

Gesenius Hebrew And Chaldee Lexicon - H2931

H2931 - GES2833
טָמֵא
inf. טָמְאָה ( Lev 15:32,)-
(1) to be or to become unclean, to be polluted (Syr. ܛܰܡܰܐ, which follows the analogy of guttural verbs, to pollute, ܛܡܠܰܐ polluted, comp. Lat. contamino, attamino, intamino). Especially used of uncleanness in a Levitical sense both of persons and of animals (whose flesh was not to be eaten, see -Lev. 11:1-31, ); also of things, as of buildings, vessels. Opp. to טָהַד. Lev 11:24, seq. Followed by בְּ to be unclean by any thing. 15:32, 18:20, 23 18:23. [“Also to defile oneself, followed by בְּ with any thing, Psa 106:39, Ezek 22:4.”]
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,776
6,156
Visit site
✟1,089,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That would not be correct.

So you mean in the same way that bodily functions would be unhealthy by making you unclean, or having a baby?

Are those still in effect as well?
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,636
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,349.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
So you mean in the same way that bodily functions would be unhealthy by making you unclean, or having a baby?
No. Unless you believe it is a food law which last time I looked it isn't. I am talking about God's 10 commandments as being a demonstration of faith that works by love (including God's 4th commandment) as shown in Matthew 22:36-40; Romans 13:8-10; James 2:8-12 and 1 John 2:3-4. According to God's Word in the new covenant God's 10 commandment give us the knowledge of what sin is when broken according to Romans 3:20; Romans 7:7; 1 John 3:4 and James 2:10-11. Of course not to those who sin in ignorance when they do not know any better according to the scriptures in James 4:17 and Acts of the Apostles 17:30-31 but as the scriptures teach to those who have been given a knowledge of the truth of God's Word and choose to reject God's Word in order to continue in sin (1 John 3:4) as shown in Hebrews 10:26-31.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,636
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,349.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I did not allege that at all. I said it is ironic that you talk about the ten being the moral law, and then mention the two, when they are not from the ten but are from the law. But now that you admit others from the law besides the ten are still part of the new covenant, no problem.

So you do not think the two great commandments of loving God with all of our heart and soul and loving our neighbor as ourselves are new commandments? Paul, not me says these two great commandments are summarizing the 10 commandments not me in Romans 13:9 agreeing with Jesus in Matthew 22:36-40. Then we have the same questions already shown in Luke 10:25-28 and Matthew 19:16-19 , what do you think the difference in the answer to these questions are?
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,776
6,156
Visit site
✟1,089,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No. Unless you believe it is a food law which last time I looked it isn't.

Why would it have to be a food law for it to be moral? You indicated food laws were moral because of uncleanness. This also deals with uncleanness.

Leviticus 12 Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 2 “Speak to the children of Israel, saying: ‘If a woman has conceived, and borne a male child, then she shall be unclean seven days; as in the days of her customary impurity she shall be unclean.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,776
6,156
Visit site
✟1,089,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So you do not think the two great commandments of loving God with all of our heart and soul and loving our neighbor as ourselves are new commandments?

Why would I? They are from the Old Testament.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,636
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,349.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Why would I? They are from the Old Testament.
Loving God with all of our heart and soul and our neighbor as yourself are from the old covenant as they are from the new covenant right? - Matthew 22:36-40; Luke 10:25-28
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,776
6,156
Visit site
✟1,089,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Loving God with all of our heart and soul and our neighbor as yourself are from the old covenant as they are from the new covenant right?

I don't know what that means.

They are not new commandments. They are from the law.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,636
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,349.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Why would it have to be a food law for it to be moral? You indicated food laws were moral because of uncleanness. This also deals with uncleanness.

Leviticus 12 Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 2 “Speak to the children of Israel, saying: ‘If a woman has conceived, and borne a male child, then she shall be unclean seven days; as in the days of her customary impurity she shall be unclean.
We were discussing food laws. Your changing the subject matter again. I had already posted from the start all God's commandments are righteousness from Psalms 119:172 and righteousness is moral right doing depending on covenant application.
 
Upvote 0